Dubuque, Iowa, intellectual property lawyers represented the parties in a patent infringement dispute.

Chicago, Illinois copyright lawyers represented the parties in a dispute over ownership of a song.

In 2012, sixteen-year-old Eddie Lee Richardson enjoyed making instrumental hip-hop beats and uploading them to the internet under the moniker Hotwire the Producer. One beat Richardson crafted is titled “*Hood* Pushin Weight” (HPW). The track has all the trappings of a successful hip-hop

New York, New York, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on copyright infringement and state law claims.

Former Congressman George Santos sued Jimmy Kimmel, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. (“ABC”), which airs Kimmel’s
late-night show Jimmy Kimmel Live! (“JKL”), and ABC’s parent company, The Walt Disney Company. Santos’s suit aro

Butte, Montana, intellectual property lawyers represented the parties in a trademark infringement dispute.

Trademark infringement is the unauthorized use of a registered or unregistered trademark on goods or services that is likely to cause consumer confusion, deception, or mistake about the source of the goods. To prove infringement, a plaintiff must show they own a valid trademark, tha

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of heroin with:
possession of child porn and distribution and receipt of child pornography.

Motion to post-conviction relief. 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

(a) A prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by Act of Congress claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the

New York City, New York, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a copyright violation theory.

In a copyright action, the affirmative defense of fair use “excuses what
might otherwise be considered infringing behavior, allowing courts to avoid
rigid application of the Copyright Act when it would stifle the very creativity the4
Act is meant to promote.”

Los Angeles, California intellectual property lawyers represented the parties in a copyrights infringement dispute.

The panel held that to state a claim for copyright infringement, a plaintiff must plausibly allege that she owns a valid copyright, and the defendant copied protected aspects of her work. The second prong contains two separate components: factual copying and unlawful appropr

Los Angeles, California intellectual property lawyers represented the parties in a Lanham Act case.

This case presents a straightforward, but nonetheless novel, question of law: In light of the Supreme Court’s
narrow decision in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, 599 U.S. 140 (2023), does the Rogers test
apply to a trademark infringement claim involving an ani

Los Angeles and Glendale, California and Milwaukee, Wisconsin intellectual property lawyers represented the parties in a declaratory judgment and trademark infringement case.

Nature’s Way owned the U.S. trademark “Nature’s
Way” for use on its nutritional supplements. Doctor’s Best,
a competitor, developed a new line of branded supplements,
“Nature’s Day,” and s

Nashville, Tennessee civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a music royalty dispute.

In all its many forms, music is a powerful influence. One of music’s great gifts is its knack for soothing the mind. Think of the way listening to your favorite song takes you to a place where, at least temporarily, life’s frustrations
are quickly set aside. Music’s perhaps most end

Salt Lake City, Utah criminal defense lawyers represented the Plaintiff seeking the vacation of a sentenced pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255, which provides:

(a) A prisoner in custody under sentence of a court established by Act of Congress claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States, or that the c

New York, New York intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a copyight infringement theory.

West Palm Beach, Florida civil rights lawyers represented the parties in a Civil Rights Violation dispute.

Civil rights violations occur when individuals are unfairly treated or denied their fundamental rights due to protected characteristics or when their constitutional rights are infringed upon by government actors or private individuals. These violations can involve discrimination, pol

West Palm Beach, Florida intellectual property lawyers represented the parties in a trademark infringement dispute.

Trademark infringement occurs when someone uses a trademark or service mark without permission in a way that's likely to confuse consumers about the source of goods or services. This unauthorized use can lead to legal action by the trademark owner, including injunctions and

Tulsa, Oklahoma, intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff and Defendant in a copyright infringement case.

Tacotunes was founded in 2005. Our primary business objective and company slogan are synonymous – simply provide the very best audio solutions for your Toyota. By offering a wide array of audio upgrade solutions for your Toyota, tacotunes has become the go to place fo

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with public intoxication in violation of 37 O.S. 8-101(D) and resisting arrest in violation of 21 O.S. 268.

37A O.S. 6-101(D) provides:

A. No person shall:

1. Knowingly sell, deliver or furnish alcoholic beverages to any person under twenty-one (21) years of age;

2. Sell, deliver or kn

Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with murder.

On November 5, 2016, Defendant broke into a Newark apartment after seeing a Facebook post that made negative comments about him.

Defendant proceeded to tie up and torture all, and kill some, of the inhabitants, most of whom were children, by stabbing and shooting them. The surviving victims

Metairie, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with disturbing the peace.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with public intoxication in violation of 37A OS. 6-101 (D), which provides:

A. No person shall:

1. Knowingly sell, deliver or furnish alcoholic beverages to any person under twenty-one (21) years of age;

2. Sell, deliver or knowingly furnish alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated person or to an

Providence, Rhode Island trademark infringement lawyer represented the Plaintiff.

Phoenix, Arizona trademark infringement (Lanham Act) intellectual property rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff.

White Plains, New York copyright lawyer represented the Plaintiff.

Wilmington, Delaware patent lawyers represented the Plaintiff which sought damages for infringement.

New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiffs.

New York, New York personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on copyright infringement, fraudulent inducement, breach of contract, and unjust infringement.