United States of America v. Julio Ruiz Chuta |
Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with immigrant smuggling. |
Luis Alberto Gomez Rosario, et al. v. Alejandro Mayorkas |
San Francisco, California immigration lawyer represented Plaintiffs challenging removal from the United States. |
United States Department of Labor v. Tara Construction, Inc. and Pedro Pirez |
Boston, Massachusetts civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant accused of retaliating against an employee who reported an on-the-job injury. |
United States of America v. Andy Manuel Reanos-Moren |
San Francisco, California criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with large-scale drug distribution conspiracy. |
United States of America v. Alfredo Viveros-Chavez |
Chicago, Illinois immigration lawyer represented Defendant charged with unlawful reentry of a noncitizen who lacked legal status. |
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA v. KEVIN XAVIER DICKERSON STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, v. ARIANNA CHERELLE REECY |
|
United States of America v. Louis D. Coleman, III |
Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with kidnapping and murder. |
United States of America v. Maical Kvec |
Wheeling, West Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with being in the United States illegally. |
United States of America v. Haoyang Yu |
Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant who was charged with possessing a stolen trade secret, the first-ever conviction following a criminal trial of this kind in the District of Massachusetts. |
United States of America v. Franklin Pineda-Caceras, aka “Bomba” |
Nashville, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with drug distribution and firearm felonies. |
Loretta Gilbert v. The United States of America |
Florence, South Carolina personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant United States of America on a Government Tort Claims Act theory. |
Y. G. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services |
|
United States of America v. Jose Luis Gutierrez-Plascencia |
Corpus Christi, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with bringing in and harboring aliens. |
United States of America v. Nan Ma |
St. George, Utah criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with failing to file financial reports with the United States Treasury after bringing currency in excess of $10,000 back into the United States from China. |
Jonathan Eliazar Merlo v. Victor Manuel Lopez |
|
United States of America v. Zahida Aman, Mohammad Nauman Chaudhri and Mohammed Rehan Chaudhri |
Richmond, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with illegal forced labor. |
United States of America v. Paul J. Carter, a/k/a Paul Hamilton, a/ka/ Paul Cristallo |
Albany, New York criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with making false statements on an immigration application. |
United States of America v. Alexei Saab, a/k/a Ali Hassan Saab, Alex Saab, and Rachid |
New York, New York criminal defense lawyers represented Defendant charged with conspiracy to provide material support or resources to Hizaballh. |
United States of America v. Alessandro Doreus, Jean Elie Doreus Jovin, and Djouman Doreus |
Orlando, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with conspiracy to possess an unauthorized access device. |
Prymas Nazreth Vaz v. David Neal and Jill L. Anderson |
Las Vegas, Nevada immigration lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants seeking a writ on mandamus to compel the Executive Office for Immigration Review, an agency within the Department of Justice that maintains an Attorney Discipline Program, tocomplete its investigation of plaintiff’s complaint against his former attorney and to report its investigation to plaintiff. |
United States of America v. Jeremy Nicholas Botonis |
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with sending hundreds of sexually explicit messages to a male minor and for touching the child in a sexual manner. |
Peter Donatus Udo v. Merrick B. Garland |
San Francisco, California lawyers represented petitioner who appealed a adverse immigration law decision. |
United States of America v. Kheungkham Vongphakdy |
Charlotte, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with fraudulently obtaining American citizenship. |
United States of America v. Nery A. Martinez Vasquez and Maura N. Martinez |
Sacramento, California criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with conspiring to subject others to slave labor. |
Petro Contreras-Rojas v. Merric Garland |
New Orleans, Louisiana immigration lawyer represented Petitioner seeking review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Contreras-Rojas contends that his due process rights were violated when the immigration judge (IJ) curtailed testimony regarding crimes committed against his family in Mexico b... More... $0 (04-29-2022 - LA) |
Next Page |