Imputed Fault Law
 
Jody Blatchley, et al. v. St. Anthony Summit Medical Center

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

To prevail on a claim of medical malpractice in Colorado, a plaintiff must prove that a healthcare provider failed to conform to an acceptable standard of health care and that this failure caused injury. A jury will compare the defendant’s conduct with w... More...
   $0 (02-27-2024 - CO)

Nenad Duric v. Cevilval Williams and Schneider National Carriers, inc.

Newark, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Under New Jersey's Comparative Negligence law, an individual's fault for the accident cannot be more than the individual from whom damages are sought. Therefore, recovery of damages is permitted when each person in a 2 car accident is 50% at fault, but not if you are mor... More...
   $1 (02-26-2024 - NJ)

Brian Cherry v. Arcbest Logistics, Inc., et al.

Trenton, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY HUNTERDON COUNTY, HNT-L000461-20, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Under New Jersey's Comparative Negligence law, an individual's fault for the accident cannot be more than ... More...
   $0 (02-26-2024 - NJ)

Sharisse Brisker-Stevenson v. L Oreal USA, Inc., et al.

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or damages.

L’Oréal USA le... More...
   $0 (02-26-2024 - IL)

Jose Medina, et al. v. De La Cruz, et al.

McAllen, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Hidalgo County, District Court, 398 Judicial District and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

In Texas, is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, a plaintitff can sue for da... More...
   $1 (02-23-2024 - TX)

Marlon McCorkell, et al. v. Kerry Dickson, et al.

Camden, New Jersey personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Under New Jersey's Comparative Negligence law, an individual's fault for the accident cannot be more than the individual from whom damages are sought. Therefore, recovery of damages is permitted when each person in a 2 car accident is 50% at fault, but not if you are more at fault tha... More...
   $1 (02-22-2024 - NJ)

Rodney Moss v. New Bern Transport Corporation

Miami, Florida personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.


Florida operates under the legal doctrine of “pure comparative negligence” for purposes of assigning parties involved in an accident their portion of the blame. Under this doctrine, the injured party's compensation is reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to t... More...
   $0 (02-22-2024 - FL)

John L. Galbreath v. Shawn P. Samsel, Roberts Trucking Company, LLC, and Wavepoint Trucking Company, LLC

Raleigh, North Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Robeson County Superior Court, 23-CVS-286, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

North Carolina's strict rules on determining fault in car accidents are known as “pure contributory negligence” laws. ... More...
   $1 (02-21-2024 - NC)

Liliany Castellanos-Peron v. Genius Trucking LLC, et al.

Louisville, Kentucky, a personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the plaintiff, who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Kentucky is a pure comparative negligence state. If both you and the other party in an accident are partially responsible for causing the accident, the fault will be distributed between you both in percentages.

... More...
   $1 (02-20-2024 - KY)

Christine M. Baker v. Zachary Reynolds

Dayton, Ohio personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Ohio, 2023 CV 06192, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Ohio negligence laws follow the modified comparative negligence approach which reduces damages in proportion to the claimant's degree of fault. ... More...
   $0 (02-20-2024 - OH)

Tania Barreiro, et al. v. North American Van Lines

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Court of Common Pleas Philadelphia County, 230400387, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

In Pennsylvania, you can recover compensation for a personal injury claim as long as the level of fault is not more than ... More...
   $0 (02-20-2024 - PA)

William Reed v. Expeditus Transport, LLC

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Tenth Judicial District Court, Harding County, D-1010-CV-23-00031, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Negligence claims are the legal system's method for determining fault in injury-causing accidents and how much, if anything,... More...
   $1 (02-20-2024 - NM)

Dr. Daniel Rodriquez v. Little Giant Ladder Systems, LLC

Portland, Oregon personal Injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a product liability theory.

Oregon's product liability laws require a plaintiff to be no more than 50 percent at fault to be awarded damages. If you think you have a products liability claim, it is very important to protect and preserve the product as much as possible, and prevent any avoidable deterioration or change in... More...
   $1 (02-16-2024 - OR)

Antonina Walden v. Hashi Shire, et al.

Fargo, North Dakota personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Morton County Court, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

North Dakota is a modified comparative negligence state It allocates fault to all parties involved, thus reducing how much each party can recover from the car a... More...
   $1 (02-15-2024 - ND)

Leslie Greene and Minica A. Creque v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.

Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

North Carolina's strict rules on determining fault in car accidents are known as “pure contributory negligence” laws. This means that the victim has to be 100 percent free of fault for the accident in order to receive compensation. Unfortunately, this task can ... More...
   $1 (02-15-2024 - NC)

Jameel Jackson Matthews v. Quick Serve Enterprises, Inc., and Sheheen Gas, Inc.

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

n Pennsylvania, a plaintiff can recover compensation for a personal injury claim as long as the level of fault is not more than 50% of the total fault. An action to recover damages must be started within two years, and those damages can include medical bills, lost wages... More...
   $1 (02-15-2024 - PA)

United States of America v. Robert Wisnicki

Bronx, New York Criminal Defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Operating $18.8 Million Ponzi Scheme, Money Laundering, Obstruction Of Justice, And Perjury.



Robert Wisnicki was sentenced to 78 months in prison by U.S. District Judge Paul G. Gardephe for operating an $18.8 million Ponzi scheme run through his N... More...
   $0 (02-15-2024 - NY)

United States of America v. Robert Wisnicki

New York, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Operating $18.8 Million Ponzi Scheme, Money Laundering, Obstruction Of Justice, And Perjury.



Robert Wisnicki was sentenced to 78 months in prison by U.S. District Judge Paul G. Gardeph... More...
   $0 (02-15-2024 - NY)

Lauren Knapp v. Ohio Eastern Express, Inc.

Charleston, South Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Some states subscribe to the “pure comparative negligence” rule, where a plaintiff can recover damages even if he or she was 99 percent at-fault. But South Carolina follows the “modified comparative negligence” rule, with a 51 percent bar. Here, the plain... More...
   $1 (02-13-2024 - SC)

Nesbett H. Johnson, Jr. v. Jean's Team Logistics LLC, et al.

Rock Hill, South Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, 2023-CP-12-00086, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Some states subscribe to the “pure comparative negligence” rule, where a plaintiff can recover damages even if he or ... More...
   $0 (02-13-2024 - SC)

Jerome Wade v. Aizhan Kadnbaeva and GTS Transportation Corporation

Roanoke, Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Montgomery County Circuit Court, CL-22002004-00, and was removed to federal court by the Dfendant.

Some states follow a more enlightened version of the fault law called "comparative negligence." Alas, Virginia still chooses what is known ... More...
   $1 (02-12-2024 - VA)

Eury Tavarez Hernandez v. Domino's Pizza LLC, et al.

Brooklyn, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.


ORDER granting #9 Motion to Amend: The Stipulation to discontinue the action as to Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., without prejudice, and to substitute Domino's Pizza LLC in its place.
New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compen... More...
   $0 (02-12-2024 - NY)

In Re the marriage of W.B. Petitioner and M.E.B., Respondent

Sapulpa, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolved... More...
   $0 (02-09-2024 - )

Juan Antonio Montemayor, et al. v. Juan Quinones, d/b/a DJ's Transport

Kansas City, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.

Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to causing the accident in which you were injured, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault.

... More...
   $1 (02-06-2024 - KS)

William J. Moyle v. Roger T. Clark, et al.

Omaha, Nebraska personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

In Nebraska, the right to compensation is based on the “51% rule.” A plaintiff can still recover partial compensation so long as their degree of fault is less than that of the defendant(s) in the case. The plaintiff's compensation will be reduced in proportion to their percentage o... More...
   $1 (02-03-2024 - NE)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: