| State of Oklahoma v. T.B. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| Commonwealth of Virginia v. Gilberto Rodriguez |
|
Roanoke, Virginia criminal defense lawyer will represent the Defendant charged with murder |
| United States of America v. Denise Davis |
|
Camden, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Conspiring to Defraud The IRS |
| State of South Carolina v. Deandra Bontia James |
|
Greenville, South Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with murder. |
| State of North Carolina v. Aaron Johnson |
|
Greensboro, North Caolina, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving while impaired. |
| State of North Carolina v. Nigel Edge |
|
Bolivia, North Carolina, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with murder. |
| United States of America v .Peter Bardunias |
|
Albany, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempting to entice a minor to engage in prohibited sexual activity. |
| United States of America v. Alfonso Roman Brito, a/k/a Casper |
|
Statesville, North Carolina, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with onspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, |
| United States of America v. Marian Hudak |
|
Greensboro, North Carolina, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with committing a hate crime. |
| United States of America v. Kevin Perez Sandoval, a/k/a Noctorno, a/k/a Nocturno, a/k/a Dengue |
|
Alexandria, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to participate in a racketeering enterprise, conspiracy to commit murder in aid of racketeering, and conspiracy to distribute cocaine and marijuana, among other crimes. |
| State of Mississippi v. Teviyon L. Powell, William Bryant, Morgan Lattimore, and Latoya A. Powell |
|
Greenville, Mississippi, criminal defense lawyers will be represented the Defendants charged with murder. |
| United States of America .v James B. Comey, Jr. |
|
Alexandria, Virginia, criminal defense lawyers are representing the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Oklahoma v. Bobby Cabe |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession with intent to distribute, trafficking methamphetamine, driving under suspension, and possession of a stolen vehicle. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Gong Zheng |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with trafficking marijuana, possession of drug proceeds, and possession of a controlled substance without a tax stamp. |
| United States of America v. Denise Davis |
|
Camden, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Conspiring to Defraud The IRS |
| State of Ohio v. Omarion Horne |
|
Cincinnati, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with murder. |
| State of Maryland v. Charles Anthony Boatwright |
|
Baltimore, Maryland, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with murder. |
| Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Jane Doe |
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyer will represented the Defendant charged with car jacking, and eluding |
| United States of America v. Jean Brown |
|
Baltimore, Maryland, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with drug trafficking. |
| Flying T Ranch, Inc. v. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, et al. |
|
Under federal common law, Indian tribes may be sued only under two circumstances: when a tribe waives its sovereign immunity or when Congress unequivocally abrogates tribal sovereign immunity. Here, Flying T Ranch (Flying T) filed suit in Snohomish County Superior Court to quiet title to nonreservation land purchased by the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians (Tribe). Flying T contends it had acquired $0 (10-10-2025 - WA) |
| United States of America v. Keaton Overton Gunnels |
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico, pro se defendant charged with two counts of making a false statement on a loan or credit application. |
| State of Illinois v. Donald J. Trump |
|
Chicago, Illinois, constitutional law lawyers represented the State of Illinois challenging the power of President. |
| Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Donnell Brunson |
|
Scranton, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first-degree murder. |
| Jose Montanez v. Paula Price, et al. |
|
Scranton, Pennsylvania, pro se Plaintiff used the Defendants on Eighth Amendment violation theories. |
| Billy Gowans, Jr. v. Zachary Axom, et al. |
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania pro se Plaintiff challenged reverse mortgage executed by his Mother. |
|
Next Page |