San Diego, California, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with defrauding customers of her former Porsche restoration and resale business and pocketing more than $827,000. Digested by Kent Morlan Andrea Nicole Doherty, 38, admitted that she took over CPR Classic

Stilwell, Oklahoma, civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff claiming that Service Oklahoma does not have the authority to revoke Plaintiff's driving privileges because the requirement to install a mandatory ignition interlock program called an IDAP is so punitive in nature that it violates the Double Jeopardy progection of both the United States and Oklahoma Constitutions. 47 O.S. §

San Francisco, California, criminal defense lawyers represent the Defendants charged with securities fraud. Digested by: Kent Morlan Michael Stamp and Marcus Plank accused of exploitation of their employer’s confidential information allowed them to make more than $300,000 in illegal

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with larceny of an automobile in violation of 21 O.S. 1720, which provides: Any person in this state who shall steal an aircraft, automobile or other automotive driven vehicle, construction equipment or farm equipment shall be guilty of a Class D1 felony offense and, upon conviction, shall be punished by imprisonment as

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with larceny of controlled drugs - Oxycodone, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-403.A, which provides: A. Except as authorized by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, it shall be unlawful for any person: 1. To distribute, dispense, transport with intent to distribute or dispense, possess with intent to manufacture

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with aggravated driving under the influence of Alcohol and/or drugs in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.D, which provides: D. Any person who is convicted of a violation of driving under the influence while also committing one of more of the following acts: 1. Driving, operating, or being in actual physical control of a moto

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with false representation in obtaining food stamps over $500 in violation of 56 O.S. 243.B.1, which provides: B. 1. Any person, firm or corporation who violates any of the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a: a. misdemeanor, if the aggregate amount of food stamps or coupons, or the aggregate value of any b

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Robbi Barker represented the Defendant charged with assault and battery upon a police officer in violation of 21 O.S. 649.B, and assault and battery in violation of 21 O.S. 644.B. Title 21 O.S. 649: B. Every person who, without justifiable or excusable cause knowingly comm

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with malicious injury to property $1,000 or more in violation of 21 O.S. 1760.A.2, which provides: A. Every person who maliciously injures, defaces or destroys any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than such as are specified in Section 1761 et seq. of this title, is guilty of: 1. A misdemean

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol, second offense, in violation of 47 O.S.. 11-902.A.2., which provides: A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided for in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle within this state, whether upon public roads, highways,

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence with great bodily injury in violation of 47 O.S. 11-904.B, which provides: B. Any person who causes an accident resulting in great bodily injury to any person other than himself or herself while driving or operating a motor vehicle within this state and who is in violation of the provisio

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with aggravated DUI alcohol (municipal arrest) in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902((B), which provides: A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided for in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle within this state, whether upon public roads, highways, streets, turnpike

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stalking in violation of 21 O.S. 1173, which provides: A. Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person in a manner that: 1. Would cause a reasonable person or a member of the immediate family of that person as defined in subsection F of this section to feel frightened,

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with child endangerment in violation of 21 O.S. 851.1 and driving under the influence of alcohol-second offense in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902(A)(2), which provides: A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided for in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle withi

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with receiving and possession stolen property in violation of 21 O.S. 1713 (A), which provides: A. Every person who buys or receives, in any manner, upon any consideration, personal property of a value of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) or more that has been stolen, embezzled, obtained by false pretense or robbery, know

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Kent Morlan represented the Defendant charged with aggravated DUI alcohol in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.D, which provides: D. Any person who is convicted of a violation of driving under the influence while also committing one of more of the following acts: 1. Driving, ope

Burlington, Vermont, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stalking. Reported by Kent Morlan Mark Sterling was charged with one count of aggravated stalking while possessing a deadly weapon under 13 V.S.A. § 1063(5). Additionally, he was charged with violation

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Jesse Rake represented the Defendant charged with possession of controlled drug in a jail or penal institution in violation of 57 O.S. 21, which provides: A. Any person who, without authority, brings into or has in his or her possession in any jail or state penal institution or other place where prisoners are located, any gun, knife, bomb or other dangero

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony pointing a firearm in violation of 21 O.S. 1289.16, which provides: A. It shall be lawful to point a firearm, knife, or any other deadly weapon at another person or persons by: 1. A person who can legally own or possess a weapon pursuant to the provisions of Section 1272 of this title: a. during an act

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Kaylind Landes represented the Defendant charged with aggravated DUI alcohol and/or drug in violation of 47 O.S.C. 11-902.D, which provides: D. Any person who is convicted of a violation of driving under the influence while also committing one of more of the following acts

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Jcott Hjelm represented the Defendant charged with larceny of lost property in violation of 21 O.S. 1702, which provides: One who finds lost property under circumstances which gives him knowledge or means of inquiry as to the true owner, and who appropriates such property to his

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with engaging in prostitution in violation of 21 O.S. 1029(A), which provides: A. It shall further be unlawful: 1. To engage in prostitution, lewdness, or assignation; 2. To solicit, induce, or entice another person to pay or provide money or any other item or service of value to engage in an act of lewdness, assig

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with embezzlement by an employee in violation of 21 O.S. 1451, which provides: A. Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property of any person or legal entity, legally obtained, to any use or purpose not intended or authorized by its owner, or the secretion of the property with the fraudulent intent to appropri

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant Keonte Dejuan Code charged with violation of the Computer Crimes Act, 21 O.S. 1953.A, which provides: A. It shall be unlawful to: 1. Willfully, and without authorization, gain or attempt to gain access to and damage, modify, alter, delete, destroy, copy, make use of, use malicious computer programs on, disclose or take possession

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with larceny of automobile in violation of 21 O.S. 1720, which provides: Any person in this state who shall steal an aircraft, automobile or other automotive driven vehicle, construction equipment or farm equipment shall be guilty of a Class D1 felony offense and, upon conviction, shall be punished by imprisonment as prov