Pawhuska, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with lewd or indecent acts to a child under age 16 in violation of 21 O.S.C. 1123. A. It is a Class A3 felony offense for any person to knowingly and intentionally: 1. Make any oral, written or electronically or computer-generated lewd or indecent proposal to any child under sixteen (16) years of age, or other indiv

Pawhuska, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with embezzlement in violation of 21 O.S. 1451, which provides: A. Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property of any person or legal entity, legally obtained, to any use or purpose not intended or authorized by its owner, or the secretion of the property with the fraudulent intent to appropriate it to suc

Pawhuska, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with possession of a stolen vehicle in violation of 47 O.S. 4-103 and false statements of material facts. Under Oklahoma Statutes §47-4-103, possession of a stolen vehicle is a felony offense in Oklahoma. [1] (https://law.justia.com/codes/oklahoma/title-47/section-47-4-103/), [2] (https://www.wirthlawoffice.com/oklaho

Pawhuska, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with protective order violation in violation of 22 O.S. 60.6, which provides: A. Except as otherwise provided by this section, any person who: 1. Has been served with an emergency temporary, ex parte or final protective order or foreign protective order and is in violation of such protective order, upon conviction,

Guthrie, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first degree murder in violation of 21 O.S. 1114, rape by instrumentation in violation of 21 O.S. 1114, and forcible oral sodomy in violation of 21 O.S. 888, Reported by: Kent Morlan The trial court allowe

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first degree rape in violation of 21 O.S. 1114. Reported by: Kent Morlan Appellant contends that the fact the victim was unconscious at the time of the attack due to intoxication does not satisfy the element

New Orleans, Louisiana criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with commit health care fraud, in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. 1349 and 1347. Reported by Kent Morlan Jamie P. McNamara operated several laboratories in Louisiana and Texas, which obtained fraudulent do

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with Count 1, trafficking in illegal drugs, after former conviction of two (2) or more felonies, in violation of 63 O.S.Supp.2004, § 2-415; Count 2, possession of marijuana, second offense, after former conviction of one (1) or more felonies, in violation of 63 O.S.Supp.2004, § 2-402; and Count 3, failure to obtain a dru

Pawhuska, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Steve Venturi represented the Defendant charged with aggravated driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.D, which provides: D. Any person who is convicted of a violation of driving under the influence whil

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm after former conviction of a firearm. Reported by: Kent Morlan, Esq. a person convicted of a felony cannot own, possess, or control a firearm in Oklahoma under Oklahoma Statutes Title

Claremore, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with malicious injury to property in violation of 21 O.S. 1760, which provides: A. Every person who maliciously injures, defaces or destroys any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than such as are specified in Section 1761 et seq. of this title, is guilty of: 1. A misdemeanor, if the damag

Fayetteville, Arkansas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempting to sell real estate he did not own and unlawfully trying to use another person’s identify in the attempt. Reported by: Kent Morlan Steven James Smith, age 41, engaged in a scheme to d

Urbana, Illinois, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: 21:841A=CD.F CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - SELL, DISTRIBUTE, OR DISPENSE - On or about June 20, 2024 in Sangamon County, in the CDIL, the Defendant, DISTRIBUTIOIN OF METHAMPHETAMINE in violation of Title 21 USC Sec 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii). 21:841A=CD.F CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - SELL, DISTRIBUTE, OR DISPENSE - On o

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Michael French represented the Defendant charged with: AGGRAVATED DUI ALCOHOL AND / OR ALCOHOL, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.D, which provides: D. Any person who is convicted of a violation of driving under the influence while also committing one of more of the follo

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: ABUSE B Y CARETAKER, in violation of 21 O.S. 843.1,, amended to aggravated assault and battery in violation of 21 O.S. 646, which provides: A. An assault and battery becomes aggravated when committed under any of the following circumstances: 1. When great bodily injury is inflicted upon the person assaulted;

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with larceny of merchandise from a retailer in violation of 21 O.S. 1731, which provides: A. Larceny of merchandise held for sale in retail or wholesale establishments shall be punishable as follows: 1. For the first or second conviction, in the event the value of the goods, edible meat, or other corporeal property wh

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: POSSESSION OF FIREARM AFTER JUVENILE ADJUDICATION, in violation of 21 O.S. 1283.D, which provides: D. It shall be unlawful for any person previously adjudicated as a delinquent child or a youthful offender for the commission of an offense, which would have constituted a felony offense if committed by an adult, to h

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: DOMESTIC ASSAULT OR ASSAULT AND BATTERY WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON, in violation of 21 O.S. 644.D.1 D. Any person who, with intent to do bodily harm and without justifiable or excusable cause, commits any assault and battery upon an intimate partner or a family or household member as defined by Section 60.1 of Titl

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: PHYSICAL CONTROL OF VEHICLE WHILE INTOXICATED - SECOND OFFENSE, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.C2 UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402(A)(1) RESISTING AN OFFICER, in violation of 21 O.S. 268 47 O.S. 11-902.C.2 provides: 2. Any person who, having been convicted of or havin

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with domestic assault and battery. Reported by: Kent Morlan In Oklahoma, the BIP program stands for the Batterers Intervention Program, a structured, 52-week educational initiative regulated and certified by the

¶1 Petitioner, Granville Lee Humphrey, was charged by Information with Possession of Controlled Dangerous Substance, Case No. CRF-79-2159, and Carrying a Firearm, After Former Conviction of a Felony, Case No. CRF-79-2273. He posted a bond in the sum of $3,000.00 (Three Thousand Dollars) and $5,000.00 (Five Thousand Dollars) respectively. Preliminary hearing in each case was set for July 10, 1979,

Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Ben Waters represents the Defendant charged with child abuse. Reported by Kent Morlan 21 O.S. § 843.5 (OSCN 2026), Abuse of Elderly or Disabled Persons or Children A. Any person who shall willfully or maliciously engage in child abuse, as

San Diego, California, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with defrauding customers of her former Porsche restoration and resale business and pocketing more than $827,000. Digested by Kent Morlan Andrea Nicole Doherty, 38, admitted that she took over CPR Classic

Stilwell, Oklahoma, civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff claiming that Service Oklahoma does not have the authority to revoke Plaintiff's driving privileges because the requirement to install a mandatory ignition interlock program called an IDAP is so punitive in nature that it violates the Double Jeopardy progection of both the United States and Oklahoma Constitutions. 47 O.S. §