Brooklyn, New York criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with money laundering for his role as the owner and operator of a voice over internet protocol (VoIP) company that facilitated and profited from the introduction of fraudulent robocall traffic into the United States.

Jon J. Kahen, 48, of Great Neck, New York, was the owner and chief executive officer of Global Voicecom ... More...   $0 (09-16-2022 - NY)

Bay City, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with placing explosive packages outside a cellphone store.

John Douglas Allen, 76, was indicted with two separate criminal cases related to the placement of explosive packages outside cellphone stores in Cheboygan, and Sault Ste Marie, Michigan.

Allen admitted that on September 15, 2021, at approximately 7... More...   $0 (07-18-2022 - MI)

Lincoln, Nebraska criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with making multiple threatening posts on an Instagram page associated with an election official.

Travis Ford, 42, of Lincoln, made multiple threats in August 2021 toward the election official, specifically: “Do you feel safe? You shouldn’t. Do you think Soros will/can protect you?” and “Your security detail i... More...   $0 (06-16-2022 - NE)

New Haven, Connecticut criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with distributing heroin, fentanyl, cocaine and crack.

In May 2020, the DEA New Haven Task Force and Waterbury Police Department began an investigation into a drug trafficking organization that was distributing large amounts of heroin, cocaine and crack in the Waterbury area, and was believed to be headed by Zach... More...   $0 (06-08-2022 - CT)

San Francisco, California telecommunications law lawyers represented Defendant charged with violating the FTC Act.

Twitter, Inc. agreed to pay $150 million in civil penalties and to implement robust compliance measures to protect users’ data privacy. The settlement will resolve allegations that Twitter violated the FTC Act and an administrative order issued by the FTC in March 2011 by m... More...   $0 (05-25-2022 - CA)

Orlando, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with conspiracy to possess an unauthorized access device.

from at least 2015 through 2020, Jean Elie Doreus Jovin (34, of Loganville, GA.), Alessandro Doreus, (29, of Port St. Lucie, FL.), and Djouman Doreus (29, of North Miami, Fl., conspired to knowingly, and with intent to defraud, possess tens of thousands of count... More...   $0 (05-11-2022 - FL)

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense attorney represented Defendant, charged with:

Count # 1. Count as Filed: DU2I, POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-401-B2
Date of Offense: 08/03/2019
Party Name Disposition Information
SHAVER, VERNON LEE Disposed: CONVICTION, 02/18/2022. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: POSSESSION OF CONTROL... More...   $0 (02-18-2022 - OK)

Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense attorney represented defendant charged with selling controlled substances in violation of 18 U.S.C. §841

Rodriguez, age 58, was indicted for possession with intent to distribute fentanyl and possession of a firearm.

On August 10, 2020, FBI conducted a search of the defendant’s apartment in the 1300 block of W. 4th Street, Wilmington, Dela... More...   $0 (02-09-2022 - DE)

Trenton, New Jersey civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Handicapped Child Act violation theory.

Title 20 U.S.C. §1401. Definitions

Except as otherwise provided, in this chapter:
(1) Assistive technology device
(A) In general

The term "assistive technology device" means any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquir... More...   $0 (10-29-2021 - NJ)

White Plains, New York consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiff, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, who sued Defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violation theory.

47 U.S.C. §227. Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
(a) Definitions

As used in this section—

(1) The term “automatic telephone dialing system” ... More...   $0 (09-16-2021 - NY)

Seattle, WA: Consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227) violations.

See: 47 U.S.C §227. Restrictions on use of telephone equipment
(a) Definitions

As used in this section—

(1) The term “automatic telephone dialing system” means equipment which has the capacity—

(A) to store or... More...   $0 (08-17-2021 - WA)

Brooklyn, New York civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on n Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory.

42 U.S.C. 12101 provides:

"The Congress finds that—

(1) physical or mental disabilities in no way diminish a person's right to fully participate in all aspects of society, yet many people with physical or mental disabilities have been ... More...   $0 (08-04-2021 - NY)

Los Angeles, California criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant who was charged with bribery.

Nizar Farhat, 63, of Palm Desert, was charged with one count of being a public official who received an illegal gratuity and one count of being a public official who received compensation from a private party for government services.

Farhat is a former construction manage... More...   $0 (07-16-2021 - CA)

San Francisco, California consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theories under 47 U.S.C. 227, which provides:

(a) Definitions

As used in this section—

(1) The term “automatic telephone dialing system” means equipment which has the capacity—

(A) to store or produce telephone numbers ... More...   $0 (06-24-2021 - CA)

Abingdon, Virginia mail fraud and aggravated identity theft charge criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, Leelynn Danielle Chytka, age 31.

“In the midst of a global pandemic, this defendant conspired with others to defraud the Virginia Employment Commission of nearly $500,000 intended for Virginians in need,” Acting United States Attorney Bubar said today. “This was money se... More...   $0 (06-14-2021 - VA)

Dallas, Texas consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violation theory.

As used in this section—

(1) The term “automatic telephone dialing system” means equipment which has the capacity—

(A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and
... More...   $0 (05-24-2021 - TX)

Tuscaloosa, Alabama pro se litigant sued Defendant on a Telecommunications Act of 1996 violation theory.... More...   $0 (05-21-2021 - AL)

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, charged with:

Count # 1. Count as Filed: LA3, UNAUTHORIZED USE OF A VEHICLE, in violation of 47 O.S. 4-102
Date of Offense: 10/13/2020
Party Name Disposition Information
HAMILTON, ADRIAN DUANE Disposed: DEFERRED, 05/18/2021. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: UNAUTHORIZED USE OF A VEHICLE(LA3)
Violation of... More...   $0 (05-18-2021 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, charged with:


Count # 1. Count as Filed: ODO, CONSPIRE/ATTEMPT TO DELIVER/MANUFACTURE/POSSESS CONTROLLED DRUGS, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-408
Date of Offense: 12/16/2019
Party Name Disposition Information
CHARLES, SARAH ELIZABETH Disposed: CONVICTION, 05/11/2021. Nolo Contendere Plea
Count as Disposed... More...   $0 (05-11-2021 - ok)

New Haven, Connecticut consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory under 47 U.S.C. 227, which provides:

It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States—

(A) to make any call (other than a call made for emerg... More...   $0 (05-10-2021 - CT)