Eric Sumpter v. The Hartford Life and Accident Company |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania employment Law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a wrongful failure to pay E.R.I.S.A. benefits. |
United States of America v. William J. Burnell, Robert B. "Brad" Calloway, and Frank J. Adolph |
New Orleans, Louisiana criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with |
Devi Rakshit v. Bank of America, N.A. |
Brooklyn, New York consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Truth in Lending Act violation theory under 15 U.S.C. 1601, which provides: |
United States of America v. Amir Aqeel |
Houston, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with COVID-19 relief fraud. |
John Diloreto v. Dr. Robin Miller, et al. |
Trenton, New Jersey prisoner civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants for violating his civil rights. |
United States of America v. Muhammad Anis, Nishant Patel, Harjeet Singh, Arham Uddin, and Ammas Uddin |
Houston, Texas criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with participting in a scheme to fraudulently obtain and launder millions of dollars in forgivable Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans that the Small Business Administration (SBA) guaranteed under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. |
Dr. Steven Greenfield v. Hanover School District |
Scranton, Pennsylvania civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Family and Medical Leave Act violation theory. |
Riley Boyle v. Legacy Health Plan No. 504 |
Eugene, Oregon employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a wrongful denial of E.R.I.S.A. employee benefits. |
United States of America v. Washington Trust Company |
Providence, Rhode Island civil litigation lawyers represented the Defendant who was accused of wrongfully engaging in a pattern or practice of lending discrimination by redlining majority-Black and Hispanic neighborhoods in Rhode Island. |
United States of America v. Dery McDuffy |
Madison, Wisconsin criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possessing more than a kilogram of heroin with the intent to distribute it and illegally possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. |
United States of America v. Subeg Singh |
Detroit, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possessing with the intent to distribute over 50 kilograms of cocaine, |
United States of America v. Alberto Beltran-Martinez |
Bangor, Maine criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with reentering the United States after removal. |
Donna Schwartz v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. |
Miami, Florida employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an E.R.I.S.A. law violation theory. |
Jean Claude Pierre Antoine v. Caine & Weiner Company, Inc. and Experian Information Solution, Inc. |
Miami, Florida consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory. |
Jude St. Ville v. Trans Union, LLC and LendingClub Bank, N.A. |
West Palm Beach, Florida consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory. |
Nathan Mehl v. LG Chem, Ltd., et al. |
Eugeme, Oregon personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory. |
Thomas Richard Devane v. Trans Union, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theories. |
Sanjeev Kaul, M.D., FACS, LLC v. Horizon Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc. |
Newark, New Jersey employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on an E.R.I.S.A. law theory. |
Louis Garcia v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
Trenton, New Jersey consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theories. |
Andrew Perrong v. Gacovina, Lake & Associates, et al. |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227). |
United States of America v. Isaac Lamont Dawson |
Raleigh, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with fraudulently obtaining Paycheck Protection Act (“PPP”) COVID-19 loans on behalf of two separate businesses he owned. |
Kytt MacManus, et al. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al. |
White Plains, New York consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theories. |
United States of America v. Heraclio Diaz-Sanchez, a/k/a Miguel Rafal Barajas-Magna |
Portland, Oregon criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with drug possession with intent to distribute cocaine. |
Kiyee Kye v. City of New York, et al. |
New York City, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants claiming his civil rights were violated by the Defendants. |
John William Scharnhorst, III v. Allen et al. |
Fayetteville, Arkansas pro se Plaintiff without a lawyer sued Defendants on prisoner civil rights violation theories. |
Next Page |