San Antonio, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with transportation of illegal aliens for financial gain.

United States Attorney Justin R. Simmons for the Western District of Texas announced today that federal prosecutors in the district filed 270 new immigration and immigration-related criminal cases from Sept. 19 through 25. Significant cases include U.S. ci

New York, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Accounting Fraud

United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Jay Clayton, announced that MICHAEL PALLESCHI, the former chairman and Chief Executive Officer of FTE Networks, Inc. ("FTE”), was sentenced today to 12 years in prison by U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon for leading a ye

Houston, Texas, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a excessive force wrongful death civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

Ashtian Barners was shot and killed by Officer Roberto Felix, Jr. during a traffic stop.

Barnes's parents sued Felix and Harris County under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.5 The district court granted summary judgment on the
p

San Antonio, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault on a federal officer, bringing in and harboring certain aliens, conspiring to transport two illegal aliens further into the United States, human smuggling

United States Attorney Justin R. Simmons for the Western District of Texas announced today that federal prosecutors in the district filed 294 ne

Billings, Montana, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempted coercion and
enticement of a minor to engage in illegal sexual activity under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) and possession of child
pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B).

Detective Travis Wafstet works in the Missoula County
Sheriff's Office and is also a member of the FBI's Child

Chicago, Illinois, whistleblower lawyers represented the Plaintiff who used the Defendant on a qui tam theory.

Relator Ronald Streck first publicly accused pharmaceutical companies of reporting falsely de-
flated drug prices to the government in 2011. Over a decade later, a jury decided in his favor against Eli Lilly, one of the largest drug companies in the world.

At a broa

Baltimore, Maryland, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sexual abuse of a child and possession of child pornography.


Federal law aggressively criminalizes and punishes the sexual exploitation of children, primarily through laws found in Title 18 of the U.S. Code.

The key statute is 18 U.S.C. § 2251, which broadly prohibits the use, enticement,

Camden, New Jersey, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violating the conditions of supervised release.

Supervised release is a common component of a sentence, but it is also conditional, so when a defendant is
found by the district court to have violated its terms, the court has authority to revoke his supervised release and return him to detention. See 18

Lincoln, Nebraska criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Conspiracy to Violate the Lacey Act
Noble Outdoors Owner Sentenced for Conspiracy to Violate the Lacey Act Involving 114 Illegal Hunts

New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a defamation theory.


A jury found that then-President Trump acted with common law malice when he made defamatory statements about
Carroll in June 2019 and awarded compensatory and punitive damages. Trump appeals, arguing that he is entitled to presidential immunity or, in the alternative, a new trial. Tr

Fairfax, Virginia civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff challenging the constitutionality of the so-called sensitive places doctrine, which allows the government to restrict the presence of firearms in certain locations.

A Fairfax County ordinance prohibits "[t]he possession, carrying, or transportation of any firearms, ammunition, or components or combination thereof” in va

Syracuse, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of child pornography.

Laws prohibiting the possession of child pornography are among the strictest in the United States and are prosecuted at both the federal and state levels

A conviction almost always results in a felony charge with severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences,

Minneapolis, Minnesota employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued asserting claims under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

Thomas was employed by the District for nearly 30 years, beginning as a
teacher and the

San Angelo, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

In Texas, premises liability law holds property owners responsible for injuries that occur on their property due to unsafe conditions. To prove a claim, an injured person must generally demonstrate that the owner was negligent by breaching a legal duty of care. The specific duty of

San Antonio, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with transporting five illegal aliens

Western District of Texas U.S. Attorney Adds 269 Immigration Cases This Week

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with drug and firearm offenses.

In 2011, a jury sitting in the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania convicted Carl Rose of federal drug and firearm
offenses. The District Court sentenced Rose to 120 months'
imprisonment, followed by a five-year term of supervised
release. But about two years a

Macon, Georgia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Civil Rights Act violation theory.

In June 2020, Sindell was a pretrial detainee in the Houston
County Jail.1 He resided in the L-Pod section of the jail, which
housed roughly eighty pretrial detainees. Jail officials checked de-
tainees' cells three times per day for contraband and rule violations.

Cleveland, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with selling
drugs that led to an overdose death, appeals his conviction on two counts of distributing
carfentanil, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), and one count of using a
telecommunications device to facilitate the transaction, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b).

On July 19,

San Antonio, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with illegal reentry
176 Immigration Cases Filed in the Western District of Texas This Week

Augusta, Georgia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with drug, firearm, and jury tampering
Convicted Drug Trafficker Sentenced to Nearly 50 Years Imprisonment

Topeka, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Attempted transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity and travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct/

When the incident took place, Mr. Spradley was 56 years old and living in Kansas City, Missouri. He expressed loneliness, testifying that he used the internet to "mee

Anchorage, Alaska personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

* * *

In Alaska, premises liability law dictates that property owners have a duty to maintain a reasonably safe environment for lawful visitors and can be held responsible for injuries caused by hazardous conditions on their property. This means they must address

Columbus, Ohio employmentlaw lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful termination theory.


Monica Gray helped a colleague secure an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The colleague's supervisor opposed the accommodation and, a few months later, reported Gray for timecard falsification. State Farm investigated the report and fired Gray. Gray t

Brownsivlle, Texas condemnation lawyers represented the Defendant in in eminent domain case.

Bennett contends that the government exceeded the scope of its easement
when it built the wall, that she therefore owns the wall, and that as a result
she is entitled to just compensation for the value of the wall. Bennett sought
to present expert testimony regarding the value of the w