Chicago, Illinois employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Family and Medical Leave Act violation theory.

The FMLA entitles eligible employees of covered employers to take unpaid, job-protected leave for specified family and medical reasons with continuation of group health insurance coverage under the same terms and conditions as if the employee had n

Madison, Wisconsin criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Embezzling Funds From St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin.

Madison, Wisconsin criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Embezzling Funds From St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin.

Oxford, Mississippi personal injury lawyer presented the Plaintiff who sued the defendants for wrongful termination.

Quilton McGee filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi against Felder Services, LLC, and Lafayette LTC, Inc dba Oxford Health and Rehabilitation. Doc. #1. The complaint contains four counts: (1) “ Count I: Sex Discrimi

Wilmington, Delaware personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Federal Tort Claim Act civil rights violation theories.

The Complaint

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.


Five years ago, on October 24, 2018, Plaintiff received news from the Tulsa Police Department (“TPD”) that he was selected for the Tulsa Police Academy (“Academy”).

The Academy commenced on January 22, 2019 (at which time Plainti

On the merits, Appellant contends the district court abused its discretion when it
denied his motion for early termination of supervised release. Appellant pled guilty on
December 26, 2007 to one count of knowingly possessing child pornography in violation
of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252(a)(4)(B) and 2252(b)(2) and one count of knowingly receiving child
pornography in violation of 18 U.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Christopher Hardy Zoukis appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion for early termination of supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e). Also
pending before the court is the Government’s motion to dismiss Appellant’s appeal. That
motion is denied.
On the merits, Appellant contends the district court abused its discretion w

Tacoma, Washington social security disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a Social Security: RSI Tax Suit theory.

An RSI tax suit is a legal action filed against the Commissioner of Social Security Administration (SSA) regarding the denial of Social Security benefits. RSI stands for "reduction, suspension, or termination of benefits."

Who Can File

Stilwell, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on wrongful termination theories.

Mobile, Alabama criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with transmitting an interstate threat to injure.

Following his termination from a local construction company, Cloepha Franks sent a series of threatening text messages to his former boss threatening to kill him.

The jury heard evidence that Franks sent the messages from Alabama to the victim who was in M

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania civil litigation, Lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant Family Medical Leave Act violation theory.


Plaintiff Rodriquez suffers from severe migraines with auras. SEPTA SUMF He began working for Defendant Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”) in 2015. After prior attendance issues, Rodriquez accumulated two negat

Greenbelt, Maryland civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on racial job discrimination under 42 U.S.C. 1981, which provides:

(a) Statement of equal rights

All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full

New York, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an employment discrimination theory.

"Employment discrimination law is a body of law that prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of certain protected characteristics. Protected characteristics can vary by jurisdiction, but some common examples include race, color, re

New York, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant 42:2000e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices) law theory.

"42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(e) is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This law applies to all employers, including private employers, state and local g

White Plains, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on nn employment discrimination theory.

"Employment discrimination law is a body of law that prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of certain protected characteristics. Protected characteristics can vary by jurisdiction, but some common examples include race, color,

White Plaintiff, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on 42:2000e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices) legal theories.

"42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(e) is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This law applies to all employers, including private employers, s

San Diego, California civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking various state court remedies.

This case was filed in the San Diego Superior of California, 37-02023-00027206-CU-WTC-NC, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Plaintiff began working for Defendant Hertz Local Edition Corporation (“Defendant” or “Hertz”) in January 2016. By 2018,

Concluding that a defendant committed the tort of malicious prosecution, the Court awards $1,769,354 in compensatory, economic, and punitive damages in favor of a man the defendant falsely accused of committing gross sexual assaults and assaults against his then wife. The Court's verdict and judgment runs against his now ex-wife's friend, who conspired with his wife to concoct the allegations that

Waco, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories.

Plaintiff Dolores Lozano (“Lozano”) brought claims against Baylor University (“Baylor”), Briles, Ian McCaw (“McCaw”), Art Briles (“Briles”), and the City of Waco.[1] (Second Am. Compl., Dkt. 50). Lozano's second amended complaint alleges violations of Titl

Lynchburg, Virginia civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an age job discrimination claim theory.

This employment case involves claims against Defendant CMFG Life Insurance Company (“CUNA”) for wrongful termination, retaliation, and failure to hire under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”). 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. CUNA moved

Denver, constitutional law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant seeking a declaratory judgment that Donald Trump violated the 14th Amendment on January 5, 2021 and should be barred from serving as President again.

Petitioners Norma Anderson, Michelle Priola, Claudine Cmarada, Krista Kafer, Kathi
Wright, and Christopher Castilian, eligible Colorado electors, bring t

Cheyenne, Wyoming personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights Violation theories.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Spencer's Motion to Dismiss
(ECF No. 17), Defendant Estate of George W. Stanford's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No.
45), and Defendant City of Cheyenne's Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a
Claim

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with:

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: SEXO, FAILURE TO REGISTER AS SEX OFFENDER, in violation of 57 O.S. 583
Date of Offense: 04/24/2020
MIZE, GREGORY SCOTT
Disposed: CONVICTION, 10/02/2023. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: FAILURE TO REGISTER AS SEX OFFENDER(SEXO)
Violation of 57 O.S. 583, which pr

New Haven, Connecticut civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

In June 1998, GBTA hired Perkins, who identifies as African American, as a bus operator. L.R. 56(a)2 Statement of Facts ¶¶ 1-2, ECF No. 47 (“Pl.'s SMF”); L.R. 56(a)1 Statement of Facts ¶ 1, ECF No. 36-2 (“Defs.' SMF”). Bus operators a