St. Louis, Missouri insurance law lawyer Thomas E. Schwart represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming $250,000 in damages.

After Defendant, American Family Mutual Insurance Company ("American Family") offered to settle P

Oklahoma City. Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with filing a Defendant's Brief in Support of Plea in Abatement, Motion to Quash, Motion to Set Aside the Information and Motion to Dismiss

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with filing a Plea in Abatement, Motion to Quash, Motion to Set Aside the Information and Motion to Dismiss .

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto liability insurance law issue.


Uninsured coverage protects the driver and other passengers in a vehicle for losses and damages suffered if injury is caused by the negligence of a driver who does not have any insurance to pay for losses and damages.

Miami, Florida personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence insurance law theory.

In this action was to recover uninsured motorist benefits, Melquiades Blanco (“Plaintiff”) filed a two-count Complaint against Progressive Express Insurance Company (“Defendant”) for breach of contract (Count I) and violation of Fla. Stat. § 624.155

El Dorado, Arkansas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Negligence, the legal theory behind most injury lawsuits, is the violation of a duty owed to another individual. In other words, to do something (or not do something) a "reasonable person" wouldn't (or would) do -- such as driving drunk or failing to ensure the safety

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Negligence, the legal theory behind most injury lawsuits, is the violation of a duty owed to another individual. In other words, to do something (or not do something) a "reasonable person" wouldn't (or would) do -- such as driving drunk or failing to ensure the safety

Trenton, New Jersey insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Ocean County, OCN L 001879 23, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

New Jersey has enacted an insurance bad faith statute that will penalize insurers for certain types of conduct in h

Jacksonville, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented Clifford William who was charged with a murder he did not commit.

"At about 2 a.m. on May 2, 1976, Jeanette Williams was shot to death in her apartment in the New Town neighborhood of Jacksonville, Florida. Her partner, 26-year-old Nina Marshall, was also shot. Marshall would tell police that she felt a stinging sensation in her ne

Honolulu, Hawaii personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Clims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care by a federal government employee.

Hawaii Auto Negligence Law:

"Duty of Care: All drivers in Hawaii have a duty to operate their

Great Falls, Montana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Montana Auto Negligence Law:

Fault-Based System: Montana operates under a fault-based system for auto negligence. This means that the driver deemed at fault for causing the acc

Missoula, Montana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries caused by a federal government employee.

the FTCA is a federal law that allows individuals to sue the United States government for certain kinds of negligence committed by its employees act

Missoula, Montana personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence and insurance law theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Montana Auto Negligence Law:

Fault-Based System: Montana operates under a fault-based system for auto negligence. This means that the driver deemed at fault for

Butte, Montana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theoris claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Montana Auto Negligence Law:

Fault-Based System: Montana operates under a fault-based system for auto negligence. This means that the driver deemed at fault for causing the accident will b

Billings, Montana personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries caused by federal government employee.

Montana Auto Negligence Law:

Fault-Based System: Montana operates under a fault-based system for auto negligence. This means that the driver d

Billings, Montana personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Montana Auto Negligence Law

Fault-Based System: Montana operates under a fault-based system for auto negligence. This means that the driver deemed at fault for causing the accident w

Boise, Idaho personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Fifth Judicial District - Twin Falls, CV42-22-03607 and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Idaho Auto Negligence Law

Duty of Care: Every driver in

Boise, Idaho personal injury bus wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Idaho Auto Negligence Law:

Duty of Care: Every driver in Idaho has a duty to operate their vehicle safely and follow traffic laws to avoid harming others. This includes avoiding behaviors

Spokane, Washington personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Duty of care: All drivers in Washington have a duty to operate their vehicles safely and follow traffic laws to avoid harming others. This includes avoiding behaviors like:

Spokane, Washington personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75 million in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Spokane County Superior Court, 21-200541-32
9CCA, 22-35714 and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Duty of care: All drivers in Wa

Seattle, Washington personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the King County Superior Court, 22-00002-16888-9 SEA, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Washington Auto Negligence Law:

Duty of

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Governmental Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Key Elements of Oklahoma Auto Negligence:

Duty of care: Every person in Oklahoma has a duty to act with reasonable care in any situation where their actions could

Stillwater, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Key Elements of Oklahoma Auto Negligence:

Duty of care: Every person in Oklahoma has a duty to act with reasonable care in any situation where their actions could potentially harm others. T

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Here's a detailed breakdown of negligence law in Oklahoma, covering key elements, principles, and how it might apply to different situations:

Key Elements:

Duty of care: Every person i

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Key Elements of Oklahoma Negligence Law:

Duty of care: Every person in Oklahoma has a duty to act with reasonable care in any situation where their actions could potentially ha