Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Astrid Orellana, et al. v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Date: 06-30-2024
Case Number: 2:23-cv-00767
Judge: Richard F. Boulware, II
Court: United States District Court for the of Nevada (Clark County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here For The Best Las Vegas Personal Injury Law Lawyer Directory
Defendant's Attorney: Matthew C.Wolf and Daniel R. McNutt
Description:
This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, County of Clark, A-23-869450-C, and was removed to federal court by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint.
Nevada uses a legal principle called Modified Comparative Negligence. This rule allows for the distribution of fault among all parties involved in an accident. If you are involved in an accident, the amount of compensation you can receive for damages will be reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to you.
The elements of a personal injury case are: 1. A duty to exercise due care, 2. Failure to exercise due, 3. Injury to another, 4. A direct causal connection between the failure to execise due care and he damages and/or injuries allegedly suffered.
Los Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories. a
This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, County of Clark, A-23-869450-C, and was removed to federal court by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint.
Nevada uses a legal principle called Modified Comparative Negligence. This rule allows for the distribution of fault among all parties involved in an accident. If you are involved in an accident, the amount of compensation you can receive for damages will be reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to you.
The elements of a personal injury case are: 1. A duty to exercise due care, 2. Failure to exercise due, 3. Injury to another, 4. A direct causal connection between the failure to execise due care and he damages and/or injuries allegedly suffered.
Outcome:
Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Astrid Orellana, et al. v. The Church of Jesus Christ of ...?
The outcome was: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Which court heard Astrid Orellana, et al. v. The Church of Jesus Christ of ...?
This case was heard in United States District Court for the of Nevada (Clark County). The presiding judge was Richard F. Boulware, II.
Who were the attorneys in Astrid Orellana, et al. v. The Church of Jesus Christ of ...?
Plaintiff's attorney: Click Here For The Best Las Vegas Personal Injury Law Lawyer Directory. Defendant's attorney: Matthew C.Wolf and Daniel R. McNutt.
When was Astrid Orellana, et al. v. The Church of Jesus Christ of ... decided?
This case was decided on June 30, 2024.