Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 08-18-2022

Case Style:

Catherine Roll v. Laura Howard

Case Number: 121,447

Judge: Per Curiam

Court: Supreme Court of Kansas on appeal from the District Court, Sedgwick County

Plaintiff's Attorney:



United States of America v.




United States District Court for the District of * (* County)

United States Attorney’s Office



Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best * Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory


If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer for free.



criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with

*






United States District Court for the District of ( County)


Best * Personal Injury Lawyer Directory







Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best * Personal Injury Lawyer Directory


If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.



The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the * , and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory
claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.

insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a result of the beach.

Civil Litigation, Plaintiff Personal Injury, Car Wrecks, Truck Wrecks, Wrongful Death, Insurance Law, Federal Tort Claims, Motorcycle Accidents, Product Liability, Medical Malpractice, Nursing Home Negligence, Premises Liability

Civil Litigation, Plaintiff Personal Injury, Product Liability

*







United States District Court for the * District of * (* County)




Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best * Civil Rights Lawyer Directory



civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a job discrimination in employment theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e.

Civil Litigation, Civil Rights, Employment Law, Job Discrimination










United States District Court for the * District of * (* County)




Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best * Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory






Kent Morlan


MoreLaw TV
The Blind Squirrel Theory and the Internet
Call: 855-853-4800 Today!





Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented plaintiff, who sued defendants on civil rights theory claiming that his constitutional rights were violated by the defendants.

Muskogee, Oklahoma employment lawyers represented plaintiff, who sued defendant on civil rights theory claiming that he he was discriminated against by defendant at work.

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on a pharmaceutical personal injury product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous produce manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.





This was a diversity of citizenship case over which the federal district court had jurisdiction because there is complete diversity of citizenship between the parties and at least $75,000 in damages being claimed and either the plaintiff or the defendant did not wish to litigate the case in the state courts of this state.

Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.










*

United States District Court for the District of ( County)



Best * Insurance Law Lawyer Directory







Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best * Insurance Law Lawyer Directory





insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming damages in excess of $75,000 as a direct result of the failure of the Defendant to pay Plaintiff’s claim.

Civil Litigation, Insurance Law, Breach of Contract, Bad Faith

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case at this time

This case was initially filed in the *, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.



Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Civil Litigation, Insurance Law, Bad Faith, Breach of Contract

*




Best * False Claims Act Lawyer Directory





Best Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory




Civil Litigation lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant, on a breach of contract theory claiming to have have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a breach of contract.







Best Real Estate Lawyer Directory










v. Social Security Administration




*

United States District Court for the District of ( county)





Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best * Social Security Disability Lawyer Directory



Nashville, Tennessee social security disability lawyer represented Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of applicant's application for benefits by HHS.



Best * Social Security Disability Lawyer Directory



SSI, DIWC and DIWW social security disability lawyer represented Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of Plaintiff’s application for benefits by HHS.

Civil Litigation, Administrative Law, Social Security Disability, SSI, DIWC, DIWW




Best * False Claims Lawyer Directory




Best * Product Liability Lawyer Directory



personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product manufactured and sold by Defendant.

Civil Litigation, Plaintiff Personal Injury, Product Liability




Best * Family Law Lawyer Directory












United States District Court for the District of ( County)


Best * Civil Rights Lawyer Directory



civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on

See: *

This case was filed in the * and was removed to federal court.

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.

Civil Litigation, Personal Injury, Civil Rights Violations


Civil Litigation, Civil Rights, Employment Law, Job Discrimination, Employment Discrimination


This case was filed in the and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.


Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.


Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 prohibits private employers with 15 or more employees, State and local governments, employment agencies and labor unions from discriminating against qualified individuals with disabilities in job application procedures, hiring, firing, advancement, compensation, job training, and other terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.







United States District Court for the District ( County)



Best * Employment Lawyer Directory



labor and employment lawyer represented plaintiff, who sued defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory.

Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

§202. Congressional finding and declaration of policy

(a) The Congress finds that the existence, in industries engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, of labor conditions detrimental to the maintenance of the minimum standard of living necessary for health, efficiency, and general well-being of workers (1) causes commerce and the channels and instrumentalities of commerce to be used to spread and perpetuate such labor conditions among the workers of the several States; (2) burdens commerce and the free flow of goods in commerce; (3) constitutes an unfair method of competition in commerce; (4) leads to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of goods in commerce; and (5) interferes with the orderly and fair marketing of goods in commerce. That Congress further finds that the employment of persons in domestic service in households affects commerce.

(b) It is declared to be the policy of this chapter, through the exercise by Congress of its power to regulate commerce among the several States and with foreign nations, to correct and as rapidly as practicable to eliminate the conditions above referred to in such industries without substantially curtailing employment or earning power. violation theory.

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.


Best * Fair Credit Reporting Act Lawyer Directory









United States District Court for the District ( County)

Best * Lawyer Directory



Consumer credit lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory..

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.

Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Civil Litigation, Consumer Credit Law, Fair Credit Reporting Act Violations

The Act (Title VI of the Consumer Credit Protection Act) protects information collected by consumer reporting agencies such as credit bureaus, medical information companies and tenant screening services. Information in a consumer report cannot be provided to anyone who does not have a purpose specified in the Act. Companies that provide information to consumer reporting agencies also have specific legal obligations, including the duty to investigate disputed information. In addition, users of the information for credit, insurance, or employment purposes must notify the consumer when an adverse action is taken on the basis of such reports. The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act added many provisions to this Act primarily relating to record accuracy and identity theft. The Dodd-Frank Act transferred to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau most of the rulemaking responsibilities added to this Act by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act and the Credit CARD Act, but the Commission retains all its enforcement authority.

Dallas, Texas consumer credit lawyer represent Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a truth in lending theory.

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not avilable.

The Truth in Lending Act (TILA) protects consumers against inaccurate and unfair credit billing and credit card practices. It requires lenders to provide consumers with loan cost information so that a consumer can comparison shop for certain types of loans.







United States District Court for the District (County)



Best * Americans With Disabilities Act Lawyer Directory



Disability lawyer represented Plaintiff, who used Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory.

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.

See: *

Public accommodations must comply with basic nondiscrimination requirements that prohibit exclusion, segregation, and unequal treatment. They also must comply with specific requirements related to architectural standards for new and altered buildings; reasonable modifications to policies, practices, and procedures; effective communication with people with hearing, vision, or speech disabilities; and other access requirements. Additionally, public accommodations must remove barriers in existing buildings where it is easy to do so without much difficulty or expense, given the public accommodation's resources.


Best * Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Lawyer Directory





“The use of abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by many debt collectors. Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal bankruptcies, to marital instability, to the loss of jobs, and to invasions of individual privacy.”


Best * Truth in Lending Lawyer Directory




Best * Consumer Credit Lawyer Directory



White Plains, New York consumer credit lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Truth in Lending Act violation theory.

§1692. Congressional findings and declaration of purpose
(a) Abusive practices
There is abundant evidence of the use of abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by many debt collectors. Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal bankruptcies, to marital instability, to the loss of jobs, and to invasions of individual privacy.
(b) Inadequacy of laws
Existing laws and procedures for redressing these injuries are inadequate to protect consumers.
(c) Available non-abusive collection methods
Means other than misrepresentation or other abusive debt collection practices are available for the effective collection of debts.
(d) Interstate commerce
Abusive debt collection practices are carried on to a substantial extent in interstate commerce and through means and instrumentalities of such commerce. Even where abusive debt collection practices are purely intrastate in character, they nevertheless directly affect interstate commerce.
(e) Purposes
It is the purpose of this subchapter to eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors, to insure that those debt collectors who refrain from using abusive debt collection practices are not competitively disadvantaged, and to promote consistent State action to protect consumers against debt collection abuses.


“The Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 12 U.S.C. 5512, protects people against inaccurate and unfair credit billing and credit card practices. It requires lenders to provide debtors with loan cost information so that you can comparison shop for certain types of loans.”


Best New York Securities Fraud Lawyer Directory




New York, New York consumer fraud lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendants on a securities law, 15 U.S.C. 78, violation theory.

§78m. Periodical and other reports
(a) Reports by issuer of security; contents
Every issuer of a security registered pursuant to section 78l of this title shall file with the Commission, in accordance with such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate for the proper protection of investors and to insure fair dealing in the security—
(1) such information and documents (and such copies thereof) as the Commission shall require to keep reasonably current the information and documents required to be included in or filed with an application or registration statement filed pursuant to section 78l of this title, except that the Commission may not require the filing of any material contract wholly executed before July 1, 1962.
(2) such annual reports (and such copies thereof), certified if required by the rules and regulations of the Commission by independent public accountants, and such quarterly reports (and such copies thereof), as the Commission may prescribe.

Every issuer of a security registered on a national securities exchange shall also file a duplicate original of such information, documents, and reports with the exchange.


Best * Law Lawyer Directory



Best * Fair Debt Reporting Act Lawyer Directory




Best * Administrative Law Lawyer Directory




Best * Patent Law Lawyer Directory




Best * Breach of Contract Lawyer Directory




Best * Civil Litigation Lawyer Directory



Los Angeles, CA: Civil litigation lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a real property theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of Defendant's wrongful conduct in a foreclosure action.


Best * Securities Fraud Lawyer Directory




Best * Federal Commodity Exchange Regulation Lawyer Directory




Best * Copyright Infringement Lawyer Directory



Intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory.







United States District Court for the District of South Carolina ( County)


Best * Employee Benefits Lawyer Directory



labor and employment lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an wrongful denial of E.R.S.I.A. benefits theory.

See: *


Best * Divorce Lawyer Directory




Best * Employment Lawyer Directory




Best * Intellectual Property Lawyer Directory




Best * Trademark Infringement Lawyer Directory





Best * Environmental Law Lawyer Directory










United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County)


Best Family and Medical Leave Act Lawyer Directory



Labor law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) violation theory.

Civil Litigation, Labor Law, Employment Law, Family & Medical Leave Act, FMLA Claims

This cases was filed in the Tulsa Cty Dist. Ct., CJ-21-01846 and was removed to federal court by Defendant.

Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.



Best Alexandria Qui Tam Lawyer Directory




Best * Consumer Law Lawyer Directory




Best Divorce Lawyer Directory




Best Employee Benefits Lawyer Directory




Best * Family Law Lawyer Directory



In the District Court in and for Custer County Oklahoma

Arapaho, Oklahoma family law (divorce) lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant seeking a divorce.

https://www.morelaw.com/alabama/lawyers/birmingham/fair_labor_standard_act.asp


Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best Oakland Labor and Employment Law Lawyer Directory





Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best * Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory







Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best * Social Security Lawyer Directory


If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.




social security disability lawyer represented Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of * application of DIWC/DIWW benefits by HHS.




Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best * Employment Law Lawyer Directory


Defendant's Attorney: Arthur S. Chalmers, assistant attorney general, argued the cause, and Derek Schmidt, attorney
general, was with him on the briefs for appellee.

Description: Wichita, Kansas social security disability lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants challenging the relocation of Plaintiff.

The defendants sought to relocate Catherine Roll, an individual
with significant mental and physical disabilities, from the Parsons State Hospital and
Training Center (Hospital), where she has been a long-term resident, to a community-
based treatment center. Roll, through her guardians, resisted such a transfer and
contended that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Social Security Act
(SSA) prohibited the defendants from changing her placement without her approval. The
district court held that she did not have a statutory right to remain at the Hospital. The
Court of Appeals affirmed that order, and we granted review.

https://www.kscourts.org/KSCourts/media/KsCourts/Opinions/121447_1.pdf?ext=.pdf

Outcome: The district court ignored the uncontroverted evidence—which the defendants'
own witnesses provided—that she had active treatment needs and was receiving active treatment for those needs at the Hospital. It relied on unsupported and counterfactual conclusions that it drew from that evidence to reach an incorrect legal conclusion about Roll's rights under the Medicaid Act. The Court of Appeals engaged in an erroneous review of those factual determinations and the legal conclusion, inviting reversal by this court.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: