Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 03-23-2023
Case Style:
Carol Brady and Charlie Brady v. Howmedia Osteonics Corporation
Case Number: 1:18-CV-12049
Judge: Indira Talwani
Court: United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (Suffolk County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney: Gene M. Williams, David L. Ferrera, Nelson G. Apjohn
Description: Boston, Massachusetts personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous produce designed, manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.
Under Massachusetts law, a plaintiff must prove that a product was defective and unreasonably dangerous for its intended purpose when it was placed in the stream of commerce by the manufacturer or retailer. A supplier can be held liable for failing to warn end-users of the product's "foreseeable ricks" of harm.
Outcome: 03/23/2023 36 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice of Plaintiffs Carol Brady and Charlie Brady by Howmedica Osteonics Corp.. (Catullo, Kim) (Entered: 03/23/2023)
03/23/2023 37 NOTICE OF MDL CASE CLOSED, Direct file in the District of Massachusetts; 1:18-cv-12049-IT Brady et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.. In Re: Stryker Orthopaedics LFIT V40 Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation. (Kelly, Danielle) (Entered: 03/23/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: