Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 02-16-2021

Case Style:

Mary Bodenstab v. The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut

Case Number: 1:20-cv-01275-LEK-CFH

Judge: Lawrence E. Kahn

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Albany County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:


Insurance Law Lawyer Directory


Defendant's Attorney: Meg R. Reid

Description: Albany, New York insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, Mary Bodenstab, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of James O. Bodenstab, Deceased, on a breach of insurance contract theory claiming $350,000 in damages.

This case was filed in the NYS Supreme Court - County of Rensselaer, EF2020-267136, and was removed to federal court.

Outcome: 02/10/2021 13 REPORT OF MANDATORY MEDIATION - A Mandatory Mediation session was held on 2/9/2021. Total Hours Spent by Mediator: 7.5; The outcome of Mandatory Mediation is: CASE HAS SETTLED. The Settlement Agreement and Stipulation for Dismissal are being prepared and will be submitted for the courts consideration. (O'Connor, Terence) (Entered: 02/10/2021)
02/10/2021 ADR COMPLETED - CASE SETTLED. Mediator Terence P. O'Connor terminated.(rjb, ) (Entered: 02/10/2021)
02/10/2021 14 TEXT ORDERED: This Court has been advised by counsel that this action has been settled, or is in the process of being settled. Counsel of record have also advised this Court that no infant or incompetent is a party to this action. Accordingly, pursuant to N.D.N.Y.L.R. 68.2 (a), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1) The above captioned case is DISMISSED, in its entirety, without costs, and without prejudice to the right of any party to reopen this action within sixty (60) days of the date of the signing of this order if the settlement is not consummated; 2) Any application to reopen this case must be filed within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order. An application to reopen filed after the expiration of that sixty (60) day period, unless it is extended by the Court prior to its expiration, may be summarily denied solely on the basis of untimeliness; 3) If parties wish for the Court to retain ancillary jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit a request that the Court retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the agreement or submit the agreement to the Court for incorporation of its terms into an Order retaining jurisdiction within the above - referenced sixty (60) day period for reopening the matter: 4)The dismissal of the above - captioned action shall become with prejudice on the sixty first (61) day following the date of this Order, unless any party moves to reopen this case within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order upon a showing that the settlement was not consummated, or the Court extends the sixty (60) day period prior to its expiration; 5) The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case and forward a copy of this Order to the parties pursuant to the Courts rules. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on February 10, 2021. (sas) (Entered: 02/10/2021)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: