Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 04-25-2023

Case Style:

United States of America v. George Constantine, Marc Elefant, and Andrew Dowd

Case Number: 1:21-cr-00530

Judge: Sidney H. Stein

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States Attorney’s Office in New York City

Defendant's Attorney:




Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan


Click Here For The Best New York City Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory


If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.




Description: New York City, New York criminal defense lawyers represented Defendants charged with massive trip and fall fraud scheme.

George Constantine, Marc Elefant and orthopedic surgeon Andrew Dowd participated in a massive trip-and-fall fraud scheme between 2013 and 2018.

“George Constantine, Andrew Dowd, and Marc Elefant abused their professional licenses and degrees and exploited some of the most vulnerable members of society – many of whom were poor, drug addicts, or homeless – in order to enrich themselves through this egregious trip-and-fall fraud scheme. As officers of the court, Constantine and Elefant had a duty to honestly represent their clients and uphold the rule of law. Instead, they filed hundreds of fraudulent lawsuits that were filled with lies and stole millions of dollars from small businesses and insurance companies. Likewise, Dowd, as a medical doctor, took an oath to do no harm. But motivated by pure greed, Dowd performed hundreds of medically unnecessary surgeries, earning thousands of dollars per surgery. These sentences send a clear message to all who chose to engage in fraud – no matter their professional title or degree – that they will be held accountable.”

According to the Indictment, the evidence presented in court during trial, and other statements made during court proceedings:

Between 2013 and 2018, CONSTANTINE, ELEFANT, and DOWD, among others, engaged in an extensive fraud scheme (the “Fraud Scheme” or “Scheme”), through which Scheme participants defrauded businesses and insurance companies by staging trip-and-fall accidents and filing fraudulent lawsuits arising from those staged trip-and-fall accidents. CONSTANTINE and ELEFANT were personal injury lawyers involved in the Scheme, while DOWD was an orthopedic surgeon.

Fraud Scheme participants recruited individuals (the “Patients”) to stage or falsely claim to have suffered trip-and-fall accidents at particular locations throughout the New York City area (the “Accident Sites”). In the course of the Fraud Scheme, Scheme participants recruited more than 400 Patients. Members of the Fraud Scheme often recruited Patients who were extremely poor. For example, it was common for Patients to ask for food when they would appear for their intake meetings with the lawyers. Many of the Patients did not have sufficient clothing to keep them warm during the winter and had poor quality shoes. Members of the Fraud Scheme also recruited Patients who were drug addicts, and it was common for Scheme participants to recruit Patients from homeless shelters in New York City.

In the beginning, Scheme participants would instruct Patients to claim they had tripped and fallen at a particular location, when in fact, the Patients had suffered no such accidents. Eventually, at the direction of the lawyers who filed fraudulent lawsuits on behalf of the Patients, Scheme participants began to instruct Patients to stage trip-and-fall accidents, i.e., to go to a location and deliberately fall. Common Accident Sites used during the Fraud Scheme included cellar doors, cracks in concrete sidewalks, and purported “potholes.”

After the staged trip-and-fall accidents, Patients were referred to specific attorneys, including CONSTANTINE and ELEFANT, who would file personal injury lawsuits (the “Fraudulent Lawsuits”) against the owners of the Accident Sites and/or insurance companies of the owners of the accident sites (the “Victims”). The Fraudulent Lawsuits did not disclose that the Patients had deliberately fallen at the Accident Sites or, in some cases, had not fallen at all. During the course of the Fraud Scheme, the defendants, together with others, attempted to defraud the Victims of more than $31,000,000. CONSTANTINE personally filed nearly 200 Fraudulent Lawsuits and earned more than $5 million dollars in settlement fees from these fraudulent cases. ELEFANT likewise filed nearly 200 Fraudulent Lawsuits and earned millions of dollars in settlement fees.

The Patients were also instructed to receive ongoing chiropractic and medical treatment from certain chiropractors and doctors, including DOWD. The Fraud Scheme participants advised the Patients that if they intended to continue with their lawsuits, they were required to undergo surgery, which was critical to boosting the value of any potential settlement. Patients generally were told to undergo two surgeries. Fraud Scheme participants looked for doctors, like DOWD, who were willing to perform surgeries, even when others would not. During the course of the Scheme, DOWD performed nearly 300 medically unnecessary surgeries and earned more than $3.2 million dollars. DOWD received approximately $10,000 per surgery.

* * *

In addition to their prison terms, CONSTANTINE, 60, of Plainview, New York, DOWD, 67, of Miller Place, New York, and ELEFANT, 50, of Woodmere, New York, were each sentenced to three years of supervised release. CONSTANTINE was further ordered to pay $4,774,709 in forfeiture. DOWD was further ordered to pay $2,900,905 in forfeiture. ELEFANT was further ordered to pay $955,281.54 in forfeiture. Restitution will be decided by the Court within 90 days of today’s sentencings.

Mr. Williams praised the outstanding investigative work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Mr. Williams also thanked the National Insurance Crime Bureau for their assistance in the investigation.

This case is being handled by the Office’s Complex Frauds and Cybercrime Unit. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Nicholas Chiuchiolo, Nicholas Folly, Danielle Kudla, and Alexandra Rothman are in charge of the prosecution.

18:371.F CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT WIRE FRAUD
(1ss)
ATTEMPT AND CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MAIL AND WIRE FRAUD
(4)
18:1349.F ATTEMPT AND CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MAIL AND WIRE FRAUD
(4s)
18:1341.F FRAUDS AND SWINDLES (MAIL FRAUD)
(5)
18:1341.F FRAUDS AND SWINDLES
(5s)
18:1343.F FRAUD BY WIRE, RADIO, OR TELEVISION
(6)
18:1343.F FRAUD BY WIRE, RADIO, OR TELEVISION
(6s)

Outcome: 4/25/2023 242 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Donna Aldea appearing for George Constantine. Appearance Type: Retained. (Aldea, Donna) (Entered: 04/25/2023)
04/25/2023 243 LETTER by USA as to George Constantine, Marc Elefant, Andrew Dowd, Sady Ribeiro, Adrian Alexander addressed to Judge Sidney H. Stein from AUSA Danielle Kudla dated 04/25/2023 re: Dowd Forfeiture Order Document filed by USA. (Kudla, Danielle) (Entered: 04/25/2023)
04/25/2023 244 LETTER by USA as to George Constantine, Marc Elefant, Andrew Dowd, Sady Ribeiro, Adrian Alexander addressed to Judge Sidney H. Stein from AUSA Danielle Kudla dated 04/25/23 re: Constantine Forfeiture Order Document filed by USA. (Kudla, Danielle) (Entered: 04/25/2023)
04/25/2023 245 MOTION for Extension of Time to Surrender to BOP Custody. Document filed by Sady Ribeiro. (Abell, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/25/2023)
04/25/2023 246 WITHDRAWAL of Motion by Sady Ribeiro. (Glicksman, Scott) (Entered: 04/25/2023)
04/25/2023 247 PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT as to (S1 21-Cr-530-1) George Constantine....[*** See this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment ***]... NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 1. As a result of the offenses charged in Counts One through Three of the Indictment, of which the Defendant was found guilty following a jury trial, a money judgment in the amount of $4,774,709 in United States currency (the "Money Judgment"), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One through Three of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant. 2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, GEORGE CONSTANTINE, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith....[*** See this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment ***]... 7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. SO ORDERED: (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 4/25/2023)(bw) (Entered: 04/25/2023)
04/25/2023 248 PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/MONEY JUDGMENT as to (S1 21-Cr-530-3) Andrew Dowd....[*** See this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment ***]... NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 1. As a result of the offenses charged in Counts One through Six of the Indictment, of which the Defendant was found guilty following a jury trial, a money judgment in the amount of $2,900,905 in United States currency (the "Money Judgment"), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One through Six of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant. 2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, ANDREW DOWD, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith....[*** See this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment ***]... 7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. SO ORDERED: (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 4/25/2023)(bw) (Entered: 04/25/2023)

Defendants were each sentenced to 102 months in prison.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: