Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 03-21-2023

Case Style:

Marcie Faye Haslett v. Keirton, Inc.

Case Number: 1:21-cv-01112

Judge: Michael E. Hegarty

Court: United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Denver County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:






Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan


Click Here For The Best Denver Personal Injury Lawyer Directory


If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.




Defendant's Attorney: Jason H. Klein, Srah L. Dennis, Savanna L. Griffis

Description: Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability property damage theory





Federal Courthouse - Denver, Colorado


Federal Courthouse - Denver, Colorado


MoreLaw Legal News For Denver




This case was filed in the District Court of City and County of Denver, 2021CV30269, and was removed to federal court by Defendant.

As the law of product liability has developed in Colorado, claims are available for
strict product liability for defective products (Instructions 14:1 to 14:7), for product
misrepresentation (Instructions 14:22 to 14.24), for breach of warranty (Instructions 14:8 to
14:16), and for negligence (Instructions 14:17 to 14:21). The defenses to those claims are set
forth in Instructions 14:25 to 14:29, and the remaining instructions set out the verdict carrying
instructions and verdict forms (Instructions 14:30 to 14:33B)

Keirton Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes innovative engineered solutions for cannabis.

Outcome: 03/21/2023 88 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice by Defendants Keirton USA, Inc., Keirton, Inc.. (Jordan, Tamara) (Entered: 03/21/2023)
03/21/2023 89 ORDER finding as moot 86 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement; granting 88 the parties' Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. This case is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the terms of their stipulation with each party to pay their own costs and fees. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). No separate order of dismissal is necessary.The Clerk of Court shall close this case. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/21/23. Text Only Entry(mehlc4, ) (Entered: 03/21/2023)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: