Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 12-09-2022
Case Style:
Blanca Isela Mendoza v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Case Number: 1:22-cv-00910
Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (Marion county)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan
Click Here For The Best Indianapolis Personal Injury Lawyer Directory
If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.
Defendant's Attorney: Asia Larvone Ellis, Lynsey F. David, Lesley A. Pfleging
Description: Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.
MoreLaw Legal News For Indianaplolis
This case was filing in the Johnson Superior Court 4, 41D04-2203-CT-000031, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
The claims made and defenses asserted are not available.
The elements of a personal injury claim are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defendant to exercise due care, (2) damages and/or injuries caused to Plaintiff, and (3) a direct casual relationship between 1 and 2.
Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
Defendant's Attorney: Asia Larvone Ellis, Lynsey F. David, Lesley A. Pfleging
Description: Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.
This case was filing in the Johnson Superior Court 4, 41D04-2203-CT-000031, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
The claims made and defenses asserted are not available.
The elements of a personal injury claim are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defendant to exercise due care, (2) damages and/or injuries caused to Plaintiff, and (3) a direct casual relationship between 1 and 2.
Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: