Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 06-22-2022

Case Style:

Nakeyda Haymer v. Racine Family YMCA

Case Number: 20-cv-1846

Judge: William E. Duffin

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin (Milwaukee County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:



Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best Milwaukee Civil Rights Lawyer Directory


If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer for free.


Defendant's Attorney:

Description: Milwaukee, Wisconsin civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sue Defendants on a job discrimination theory (42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment))


Haymer filed this action on December 14, 2020, alleging that the YMCA violated Title VII by “maintaining a company policy that discriminates on the basis of gender,” “discriminating against Haymer in the terms and conditions of her employment based upon her gender,” “discriminating against Haymer based upon her gender with respect to her compensation,” “discriminating against Haymer by terminating her employment because of her gender,” and “terminating Haymer's employment because she opposed discrimination in the workplace.

Both sides have moved for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 19, 23.) Those motions are now ready for resolution. The court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), all parties have consented to the full jurisdiction of a magistrate judge.

Outcome: For the reasons set forth above, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Nakeyda Haymer's motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 19) is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Racine Family YMCA's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 23) is granted in part and denied in part. It is granted with respect to Haymer's claims that she suffered sex discrimination in violation of Title VII because she was required to interview for the Credible Messenger position; she was not allowed to go on the trip to Maryland; she was required to work as a Family Engagement Specialist, in the Focus on the Fathers Program, and in the Credible Messenger Program; and she was told she was not allowed to mentor boys. The motion is denied in all other respects.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule a telephonic conference to discuss further proceedings.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: