Date: 07-03-2025

Case Style:

United States of America v. Miguel Angel Sotelo

Case Number: 23-CR-346

Judge: Brantley Starr

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney's Office in Dallas

Defendant's Attorney: Chris McCaffrey

Description: Dallas, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Possession with the Intent to Distribute a Controlled Substance, Aiding and Abetting

Possession with Intent to Distribute Controlled Substances: A Summary

Possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance is a serious offense that can carry severe penalties under both federal and state laws. It's distinct from simple possession, where the drugs are intended for personal use.

Proving Intent to Distribute

To secure a conviction, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant possessed a controlled substance, knew they possessed it, and intended to distribute it. Intent to distribute can be shown through circumstantial evidence, such as large quantities of drugs, drug paraphernalia like scales and baggies, significant amounts of cash, or frequent visitors to the defendant's location. Direct evidence, though less common, is also used, and can include the defendant's own statements, being caught in the act of selling, or witness testimony.

Federal and State Laws

Possession with intent to distribute is a federal offense under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Federal cases may involve interstate activity, federal property, large drug quantities, or organized distribution networks. Penalties under federal law vary by drug type and amount, with the possibility of mandatory minimum sentences for certain drugs.

State laws also criminalize this offense. For example, in Oklahoma, possession with intent to distribute is a felony with potential penalties ranging from a minimum of 2 years to life in prison and fines up to $20,000 for a first offense. Subsequent offenses carry mandatory minimum prison time. In Oklahoma, intent to distribute can be proven by showing the intention to give away or share the substance, not just sell it.

Potential Defenses

Common defenses include challenging the legality of searches and seizures, arguing lack of knowledge or intent, claiming entrapment, asserting insufficient evidence, or stating the drugs belonged to someone else.

Important Note: Drug laws are complex and vary by jurisdiction. For specific legal advice, consulting with an experienced criminal defense attorney is essential.

Outcome: The Defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to 189 months in prison, followed by 4 years of supervised release, and assessed $100.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments: