Date: 07-03-2025

Case Style:

Nathan Crewford v. West Texas A&M University

Case Number: 23-cv-00152

Judge: Matthew J. Kacsmaryk

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Potter County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Kyle Carney

Defendant's Attorney: James Joyces and Drew Harris

Description: Amarillo, Texas employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a job discrimination theory.

* * *

42 U.S.C. 2000e, part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. This law applies to employers, employment agencies, and labor unions, making it illegal to discriminate in hiring, firing, compensation, and other terms and conditions of employment. It also prohibits retaliation against those who oppose discriminatory practices or participate in discrimination investigations.
Specifically, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-2 outlines unlawful employment practices, including:

Discrimination in hiring and firing:

Employers cannot refuse to hire or fire individuals based on protected characteristics.

Discrimination in compensation and other terms of employment:

Employers cannot discriminate in pay, benefits, job assignments, promotions, or any other aspect of the employment relationship based on protected characteristics.

Discrimination by employment agencies:

Employment agencies cannot discriminate in referrals or classifications based on protected characteristics.

Retaliation:

Employers cannot retaliate against employees for opposing discriminatory practices or participating in investigations.

Discriminatory job advertisements:

It is illegal to publish job advertisements that indicate a preference based on protected characteristics, with narrow exceptions for religion, sex, or national origin when it is a bona fide occupational qualification.

Essentially, 42 U.S.C. 2000e aims to ensure equal opportunities in the workplace and prevent unfair treatment based on an individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

Outcome: Judgment in favor of the Defendant.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments: