Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 11-21-2022
Case Style:
Sherri Williford v. Walmart, Inc. d/b/a Walmat Supercenter
Case Number: 2:21-cv-02028
Judge: Colin Stirling Bruce
Court: United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois (Champaign county)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan
Click Here For The Best Urbana Personal Injury Lawyer Directory
If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.
Defendant's Attorney: James E. DeFranco and Nicholas Clark Martin
Description: Urbana, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.
MoreLaw Legal News For Urbana
This case was filed in the circuit court Macon county, Illinois, case number 20-L-101,
The claims made and defenses asserted are not available.
The elements of a personal injury claim are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defendant to exercise due care, (2) damages and/or injuries caused to Plaintiff, and (3) a direct casual relationship between 1 and 2.
Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
Defendant's Attorney: James E. DeFranco and Nicholas Clark Martin
Description: Urbana, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident.
This case was filed in the circuit court Macon county, Illinois, case number 20-L-101,
The claims made and defenses asserted are not available.
The elements of a personal injury claim are: (1) Failure on the part of the Defendant to exercise due care, (2) damages and/or injuries caused to Plaintiff, and (3) a direct casual relationship between 1 and 2.
Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: