Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 02-07-2023
Case Style:
Christine Raines v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
Case Number: 2:22-cv-04150
Judge: Nanette K. Laughrey
Court: United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri (Cole County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney: Mark E. McFarland and Alnisa Bell
Description: Jefferson City, Missouri insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an E.R.I.S.A. law theory.
The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) is a federal law that sets minimum standards for most voluntarily established retirement and health plans in private industry to provide protection for individuals in these plans.
ERISA requires plans to provide participants with plan information including important information about plan features and funding; sets minimum standards for participation, vesting, benefit accrual and funding; provides fiduciary responsibilities for those who manage and control plan assets; requires plans to establish a grievance and appeals process for participants to get benefits from their plans; gives participants the right to sue for benefits and breaches of fiduciary duty; and, if a defined benefit plan is terminated, guarantees payment of certain benefits through a federally chartered corporation, known as the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC).
In general, ERISA does not cover plans established or maintained by governmental entities, churches for their employees, or plans which are maintained solely to comply with applicable workers compensation, unemployment or disability laws. ERISA also does not cover plans maintained outside the United States primarily for the benefit of nonresident aliens or unfunded excess benefit plans. United States Department of Labor
Outcome: 02/07/2023 23 Order of Dismissal entered by Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal regarding Rule 41(A) 22 filed on 02/06/2023, this case is hereby dismissed. Signed on 02/07/2023 by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey. This is a TEXT ONLY ENTRY. No document is attached. (Lock, Tania) (Entered: 02/07/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: