Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 07-05-2021

Case Style:

United States of America v. Mark Alexander Hopkins, a/k/a Doctor Bitcoin

Case Number: 3:21-cr-00144-L

Judge: Sam A. Lindsay

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Dallas County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: United States District Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:

Best Dallas Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory

Description: Dallas, Texas illegal operation of a cash-to-cryptocurrency conversion business charge criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, Mark Alexander Hopkins, 42, who was indicted for count of operation of an unlicensed money transmitting business.

“This defendant ignored federal law and allowed fraudsters to use Bitcoin to operate under the radar of law enforcement,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Prerak Shah. “We are determined to rid the Bitcoin marketplace of anyone who knowingly helps criminal actors stash illegal profits inside crypto wallets.”

According to plea papers, Mr. Hopkins admitted he ran a business that converted U.S. dollars to cryptocurrency, primarily Bitcoin, for a fee. He frequently sent BTC to customers’ crypto wallets without taking additional steps in verifying the source of the cash, he admitted.

In September 2019, a customer identified in court documents as “M.H.” approached Mr. Hopkins to convert U.S. dollars to BTC. The money Mr. Hopkins received from M.H. stemmed from a lottery scam he was running with a coconspirator in Nigeria.

Mr. Hopkins admitted he promised not to get involved in the details of M.H’s business dealings, but told M.H. how to circumvent financial institution reporting requirements by keeping deposits under $9,500, and directed M.H. to lie to financial institutions about the purpose of the business:

“I’m set up as a marketing company, so tell them you’re paying for a marketing campaign,” he said.

Over the course of about a year, Mr. Hopkins conducted 37 transactions with M.H., converting between $550,000 and $1.5 million, he said.

The defendant admitted he was not licensed to engage in the business of transmitting money within the states where he practiced, nor was he registered as a money transmitting business with the U.S. Department of the Treasury. He failed to follow federal laws that require money transmitting businesses to verify customers’ names, date of birth, and address – a law aimed at identifying those engaged in unlawful activity – and failed to file currency transaction reports for high-value cash-in transactions.

Mr. Hopkins now faces up to five years in federal prison.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Dallas Field Office conducted the investigation. Assistant U.S. Attorney Sid Mody is prosecuting the case.

18 U.S.C. § 1960(a) and (b)(1)(B) Prohibition of Unlicensed Money Transmitting Business

Outcome: Defendant pleaded guilty.

ELECTRONIC ORDER As to Mark Hopkins: by this order -- issued to the prosecution and defense counsel -- the court confirms the disclosure obligation of the prosecutor under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, and the possible consequences of violating such order under applicable law.

This written order is entered pursuant to Rule 5(f)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and is in addition to the oral order entered by the court on the first scheduled court date when both the prosecutor and defense counsel were present. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge David L. Horan on 7/1/2021) (mcrd) (Entered: 07/01/2021)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Find a Lawyer


Find a Case