Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 02-23-2023

Case Style:

Charles R. Wintz v. Credit Collection Services, Inc.

Case Number: 3:22-CV-908

Judge: Monte C. Richardson

Court: United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Broward County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best Jacksonville Consumer Credit Lawyer Directory

If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.

Defendant's Attorney: Chantel Christine Wonder

Description: Jacksonville, Florida consumer credit lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory under 15 U.S.C. 1692.

Federal Courthouse - Jacksonville, Florida

Federal Courthouse - Jacksonville, Florida>

MoreLaw Legal News For San Diego

There is abundant evidence of the use of abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by many debt collectors. Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal bankruptcies, to marital instability, to the loss of jobs, and to invasions of individual privacy.

(b) Inadequacy of laws
Existing laws and procedures for redressing these injuries are inadequate to protect consumers.

(c) Available non-abusive collection methods
Means other than misrepresentation or other abusive debt collection practices are available for the effective collection of debts.

(d) Interstate commerce
Abusive debt collection practices are carried on to a substantial extent in interstate commerce and through means and instrumentalities of such commerce. Even where abusive debt collection practices are purely intrastate in character, they nevertheless directly affect interstate commerce.

(e) Purposes
It is the purpose of this subchapter to eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors, to insure that those debt collectors who refrain from using abusive debt collection practices are not competitively disadvantaged, and to promote consistent State action to protect consumers against debt collection abuses.

15 USC 1692a

Outcome: 02/23/2023 19 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice (Agreed) by Charles R. Wintz. (Jara, Franklin) (Entered: 02/23/2023)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Find a Lawyer


Find a Case