Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 10-13-2021

Case Style:

William R. Hendrix and Patrica B. Hendrix v. Magnolia Auto Sales, LLC

Case Number: 4:19-cv-02603-PLC

Judge: Patricia L. Cohen

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:


Best St. Louis Personal Injury Lawyer Directory


Defendant's Attorney: Daniel E. Wilker and James A. Wilke

Description: St. Louis, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of an accident caused by Defendant’s employees.

Jurisdiction of this action in this Honorable Court is pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1332(a)(2). Plaintiffs and all Defendants are residents and citizens of different states. Plaintiffs’ claims exceed $75,000.00 in value. The crash in issue occurred in Missouri.
COUNT I
NOW COMES the Plaintiff, William R. Hendrix, by and through his undersigned attorneys, and in support of his cause of action against the defendants, Magnolia Auto Sales, LLC (“Magnolia”), and Bernard R. Rydzewski, Jr., (“BRR”), states as follows:
1. That at all times relevant hereto the Plaintiff was a resident and citizen of Nevada. The defendant, BRR, is a resident and citizen of South Carolina. The crash in issue occurred within the territorial limits of this court in the City of Foristell in St. Charles County, Missouri, at the Travel Centers truck stop.
2. That the defendant, Magnolia, is a South Carolina corporation with its principal place of business in South Carolina. Case: 4:19-cv-02603 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 09/19/19 Page: 1 of 5 PageID #: 1
Page 2 of 5
Case No.
3. That on or about December 6, 2018, the Plaintiff was in his truck at the aforesaid
Travel Centers of America truck stop. Plaintiff’s truck was parked.
4. That at the foresaid time and place the defendant, BRR, was operating a motor
vehicle in the aforesaid parking lot to the rear of Plaintiff’s vehicle. BRR was operating that
vehicle as an employee of Magnolia and in the scope of his employment relationship by
Magnolia.
5. That based upon the above, Defendant BRR owed a duty of care to Plaintiff to
operate the motor vehicle with due regard for the safety of Plaintiff and others similarly situated.
6. That in violation of the aforesaid duty, Defendant, BRR, committed one or more
of the following negligent acts or omissions:
a) failed to yield the right of way to Plaintiff’s vehicle
in violation of RSMo § 304.351
b) failed to keep a proper lookout;
c) drove his vehicle in a reckless manner;
d) drove his vehicle at a speed which is greater than is
reasonable and proper with regard to traffic conditions and the use
of the highway, or endangers the safety of any person or property
in violation of RSMo § 304.012;
e) failed to sound an audible horn warning prior to impact in violation of
RSMO § 300.410;
f) failed to reduce speed to avoid colliding with Plaintiff’s vehicle in
violation of RSMo § 304.012;
7. That BRR collided with the rear of the vehicle of William Hendrix.
8. That the above occurred as a direct and proximate result of the failure and breach
by Defendant, BRR.
Case: 4:19-cv-02603 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 09/19/19 Page: 2 of 5 PageID #: 2
Page 3 of 5
Case No.
9. That as a further direct and proximate result of the aforesaid, Plaintiff has sustained severe and permanent injuries to his body, has incurred medical bills and shall continue to incur medical bills for his treatment, has lost income, wages and benefits and may continue to lose income, wages and benefits from his employment, has suffered downtime and damage to his property, has suffered impairment which may be permanent in nature and has experienced great pain and suffering which is likely to continue into the future.
WHEREFORE the Plaintiff prays for a Judgment in his favor for an amount in excess of SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($75,000.00) and for costs of this action.
PLAINTIFF PRAYS FOR TRIAL BY JURY
COUNT II
NOW COMES the Plaintiff, Patricia B. Hendrix, by and through her undersigned attorneys, and in support of her cause of action against the defendants, Magnolia Auto Sales, LLC (“Magnolia”), and Bernard R. Rydzewski, Jr., (“BRR”), states as follows:
1. That at all times relevant hereto the Plaintiff was a resident and citizen of Nevada. The defendant, BRR, is a resident and citizen of South Carolina. The crash in issue occurred within the territorial limits of this court in the City of Foristell in St. Charles County, Missouri, at the Travel Centers of America truck stop.
2. That the defendant, Magnolia, is a South Carolina corporation with its principal place of business in South Carolina.
3. That on or about December 6, 2018, the Plaintiff was in his truck at the aforesaid Travel Centers of America truck stop. Plaintiff’s truck was parked.
4. That at the foresaid time and place the defendant, BRR, was operating a motor vehicle in the aforesaid parking lot to the rear of Plaintiff’s vehicle. BRR was operating that
Case: 4:19-cv-02603 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 09/19/19 Page: 3 of 5 PageID #: 3
Page 4 of 5
Case No.
vehicle as an employee of Magnolia and in the scope of his employment relationship by Magnolia.
5. That based upon the above, Defendant BRR, owed a duty of care to Plaintiff to operate the motor vehicle with due regard for the safety of Plaintiff and others similarly situated.
6. That in violation of the aforesaid duty, Defendant, BRR, committed one or more of the following negligent acts or omissions:
a) failed to yield the right of way to Plaintiff’s vehicle
in violation of RSMo § 304.351
b) failed to keep a proper lookout;
c) drove his vehicle in a reckless manner;
d) drove his vehicle at a speed which is greater than is reasonable and proper with regard to traffic conditions and the use of the highway, or endangers the safety of any person or property in violation of RSMo § 304.012;
e) failed to sound an audible horn warning prior to impact in violation of RSMO § 300.410;
f) failed to reduce speed to avoid colliding with Plaintiff’s vehicle in violation of RSMo § 304.012;
7. That BRR collided with the rear of the vehicle of William Hendrix.
8. That the above occurred as a direct and proximate result of the failure and breach by Defendant, BRR.
9. That as a further direct and proximate result of the aforesaid, Plaintiff has sustained severe and permanent injuries to his body, has incurred medical bills and shall continue to incur medical bills for his treatment, has lost income, wages and benefits and may continue to lose income, wages and benefits from his employment, has suffered downtime and damage to his
Case: 4:19-cv-02603 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 09/19/19 Page: 4 of 5 PageID #: 4
Page 5 of 5
Case No.
property, has suffered impairment which may be permanent in nature and has experienced great pain and suffering which is likely to continue into the future.
10. That at all times relevant hereto Patricia B. Hendrix was the spouse of and was dependent upon William R. Hendrix for her support and services.
11. That as a direct and proximate result of the aforesaid, Plaintiff has been deprived, in whole or in part, of the support and services of her husband.
WHEREFORE the Plaintiff prays for a Judgment in her favor for an amount in excess of SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($75,000.00) and for costs of this action.
PLAINTIFF PRAYS FOR TRIAL BY JURY

Outcome: 10/13/2021 70 STIPULATION for Dismissal by Plaintiffs Patricia B. Hendrix, William R. Hendrix. (Wendler, Brian) (Entered: 10/13/2021)
10/13/2021 71 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: After careful consideration, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 10/13/21. (JAB) (Entered: 10/13/2021)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: