Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 06-03-2022

Case Style:

Amanda Snider v. Premium Resolution Services, Inc.

Case Number: 4:20-cv-00487-JFH-SH

Judge: John F Heil, III

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma (Tulsa County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:




Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best Tulsa Consumer Credit Lawyer Directory


Defendant's Attorney: No appearance

Description: Tulsa, Oklahoma consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory.

15 U.S.C. §1692. Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

(a) Abusive practices

There is abundant evidence of the use of abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by many debt collectors. Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal bankruptcies, to marital instability, to the loss of jobs, and to invasions of individual privacy.
(b) Inadequacy of laws

Existing laws and procedures for redressing these injuries are inadequate to protect consumers.
(c) Available non-abusive collection methods

Means other than misrepresentation or other abusive debt collection practices are available for the effective collection of debts.
(d) Interstate commerce

Abusive debt collection practices are carried on to a substantial extent in interstate commerce and through means and instrumentalities of such commerce. Even where abusive debt collection practices are purely intrastate in character, they nevertheless directly affect interstate commerce.
(e) Purposes

It is the purpose of this subchapter to eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors, to insure that those debt collectors who refrain from using abusive debt collection practices are not competitively disadvantaged, and to promote consistent State action to protect consumers against debt collection abuses.

Outcome: 06/03/2022 19 OPINION AND ORDER by Chief Judge John F Heil, III ; entering default judgment against Premium Resolution Services, LLC ; granting 16 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 16 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 16 Motion for Costs; granting 17 Motion for Attorney Fees (pll, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/03/2022)
06/03/2022 20 JUDGMENT by Chief Judge John F Heil, III , entering default judgment in favor of plaintiff against Premium Resolution Services, LLC (terminates case) (pll, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/03/2022)
06/03/2022 ***Civil Case Terminated (see document number 20 ) (sc, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 06/06/2022)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: