Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 04-04-2023

Case Style:

Gary D. Gindele v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Case Number: 4:22-CV-936

Judge: Sean D. Jordan

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Grayson County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:




Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan


Click Here For The Best Consumer Credit Lawyer Directory


If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.




Defendant's Attorney: Forrest Mathew Seger, III for Experian Information Solutions, Inc


Michael Scott Poncin for The Bank of Missouri

Description: Sherman, Texas consumer credit lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory.
The Act (Title VI of the Consumer Credit Protection Act) protects information collected by consumer reporting agencies such as credit bureaus, medical information companies and tenant screening services. Information in a consumer report cannot be provided to anyone who does not have a purpose specified in the Act. Companies that provide information to consumer reporting agencies also have specific legal obligations, including the duty to investigate disputed information. In addition, users of the information for credit, insurance, or employment purposes must notify the consumer when an adverse action is taken on the basis of such reports. The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act added many provisions to this Act primarily relating to record accuracy and identity theft. The Dodd-Frank Act transferred to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau most of the rulemaking responsibilities added to this Act by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act and the Credit CARD Act, but the Commission retains all its enforcement authority.

Outcome: 04/04/2023 NOTICE: Notice of Dismissal: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs claims against Defendant The Bank of Missouri are dismissed with prejudice. Because The Bank of Missouri is the last remaining Defendant, the clerk will close and terminate this matter. (dm, ) (Entered: 04/04/2023)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: