Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 01-23-2023

Case Style:

State of Oklahoma v. Jorge Villalta

Case Number: CF-2019-5712

Judge: Tanya Wilson

Court: In the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Tulsa County District Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney:





Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan

Click Here For The Best Tulsa Criminal Defense Lawyer Directory



Description: Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal law lawyer represented Defendant, charged with second-degree burglary in violation of 21 ).S. 1435.




MoreLaw Legal News For Tulsa





21 O.S. 1435 provides:

A. Every person who breaks and enters the dwelling house of another, in which there is at the time no human being present, or any commercial building or any part of any building, room, booth, tent, railroad car or other structure or erection in which any property is kept or breaks into or forcibly opens, any coin-operated or vending machine or device with intent to steal any property therein or to commit any felony, is guilty of burglary in the second degree.

B. Every person who breaks and enters, climbs under, or uses any jack stands or any other item to raise any automobile, truck, trailer or vessel of another, in which any property is kept, with intent to:

1. Steal any property therein;

2. Steal any property attached thereto; or

3. Commit any felony, is guilty of burglary in the third degree.

C. As used in subsection B of this section, the term "property attached thereto" includes, but is not limited to, tires, wheels, and catalytic converters.

Outcome: DEFENDANT SWORN IN OPEN COURT. COURT REPORTER WAIVED. DEFENDANT ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVES RIGHT TO PRELIMINARY HEARING, WAIVES RIGHTS TO JURY, NON-JURY TRIAL. COURT ACCEPTS PLEA.

CT 1 - COURT DEFERS SENTENCING THREE (3) YEARS UNTIL 1-12-26 AT 9:30 AM ROOM 413. PLUS COST

CM-19-5129, CM-19-5034 AND CF-19-5712 RUN CONCURRENT.

UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE.

DEFENDANT ADVISED OF APPEAL RIGHTS, RULE 8 ISSUED, JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE ISSUED. BOND EXONERATED. DEFENDANT RECOGNIZED BACK.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: