Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
United States of America v. Jade Price
Date: 09-29-2025
Case Number:
Judge: Damon R. Leichty
Court: The United States Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Plaintiff's Attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office for South Bend
Defendant's Attorney: Click Here For The Best South Bend, Indiana Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory
Jade Price, 29 years old, of Winfield, Indiana, was sentenced by United States District Court Judge Damon R. Leichty after pleading guilty to wire fraud, announced Acting United States Attorney M. Scott Proctor.
According to documents in the case, Price falsely claimed gross income for a business when she applied for four Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans. The PPP program provided loans to small businesses for job retention and other expenses as part the CARES Act and for emergency financial assistance to Americans suffering from the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of her fraudulent representations, Price received PPP funds which she used for her own benefit on personal items.
This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jerome W. McKeever.
About This Case
What was the outcome of United States of America v. Jade Price?
The outcome was: Price was sentenced to 12 months of probation and ordered to pay $80,355.18 in restitution to the Small Business Administration.
Which court heard United States of America v. Jade Price?
This case was heard in The United States Court for the Northern District of Indiana, IN. The presiding judge was Damon R. Leichty.
Who were the attorneys in United States of America v. Jade Price?
Plaintiff's attorney: The United States Attorney’s Office for South Bend. Defendant's attorney: Click Here For The Best South Bend, Indiana Criminal Defense Law Lawyer Directory.
When was United States of America v. Jade Price decided?
This case was decided on September 29, 2025.