Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

State of Oklahoma v. J.D.C.

Date: 07-16-2025

Case Number: CM-2025-2392

Judge: Kasey Baldwin

Court: In the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Tulsa County District Attorney’s Office

Defendant's Attorney: Mark Matheson

Description:
Sapulpa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with AGGRAVATED DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902 (D)



D. Any person who is convicted of a violation of driving under the influence with a blood or breath alcohol concentration of fifteen-hundredths (0.15) or more pursuant to this section shall be deemed guilty of aggravated driving under the influence. A person convicted of aggravated driving under the influence shall participate in an assessment and evaluation pursuant to subsection G of this section and shall comply with all recommendations for treatment. Such person shall be sentenced as provided in paragraph 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 of subsection C of this section and to:



1. Not less than one (1) year of supervision and periodic testing at the defendant's expense; and



2. An ignition interlock device or devices, as provided by subparagraph n of paragraph 1 of subsection A of Section 991a of Title 22 of the Oklahoma Statutes, for a minimum of ninety (90) days.



E. When a person is sentenced to imprisonment in the custody of the Department of Corrections, the person shall be processed through the Lexington Assessment and Reception Center or at a place determined by the Director of the Department of Corrections. The Department of Corrections shall classify and assign the person to one or more of the following:



1. The Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services pursuant to paragraph 1 of subsection A of Section 612 of Title 57 of the Oklahoma Statutes; or



2. A correctional facility operated by the Department of Corrections with assignment to substance abuse treatment. Successful completion of a Department-of-Corrections-approved substance abuse treatment program shall satisfy the recommendation for a ten-hour or twenty-four-hour alcohol and drug substance abuse course or treatment program or both. Successful completion of an approved Department of Corrections substance abuse treatment program may precede or follow the required assessment.



* * *



Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:



MoreLaw was created 30 years ago to help people find lawyers to represent them.



Click the link above to see a lawyer ready and willing to represent you if you have a legal problem.



Need more help? Call: 918-582-6422 for help.



Kent Morlan







Sponsored By

MoreLaw Suites

624 South Denver, Suite 300

One Block South of the Courthouse

Free Internet Marketing

Broadband Internet Access & Answering Service

Full-Time Receptionist - 24/7 Access

Virtual Offices Starting at $50 a month.

Physical Offices Starting at $300 a month.

Month-to-Month

Multiple Private Conference Rooms - Hourly & Daily Rental



Outcome:
Deferred Sentence
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:

About This Case

What was the outcome of State of Oklahoma v. J.D.C.?

The outcome was: Deferred Sentence

Which court heard State of Oklahoma v. J.D.C.?

This case was heard in In the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma, OK. The presiding judge was Kasey Baldwin.

Who were the attorneys in State of Oklahoma v. J.D.C.?

Plaintiff's attorney: Tulsa County District Attorney’s Office. Defendant's attorney: Mark Matheson.

When was State of Oklahoma v. J.D.C. decided?

This case was decided on July 16, 2025.