Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Charles Henry Krebs v. The State of Texas
Date: 02-22-2017
Case Number: 13-16-00583-CR
Judge: Leticia Hinojosa
Court: COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Hon. Stephen B. Tyler
Defendant's Attorney:
Hon. Elliott H. Costas
Description:
Counsel for appellant filed a motion to withdraw the appeal. In a signed
attachment, appellant indicates that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. We find the
motion and attachment together meet the requirement of Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 42.2(a) that appellant and his attorney must sign a written motion to dismiss
the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we
grant the motion to withdraw the appeal and pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 42.2(a), dismiss the appeal.
attachment, appellant indicates that he wishes to withdraw the appeal. We find the
motion and attachment together meet the requirement of Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 42.2(a) that appellant and his attorney must sign a written motion to dismiss
the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we
grant the motion to withdraw the appeal and pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 42.2(a), dismiss the appeal.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments:
About This Case
What was the outcome of Charles Henry Krebs v. The State of Texas?
The outcome was: Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Which court heard Charles Henry Krebs v. The State of Texas?
This case was heard in COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, TX. The presiding judge was Leticia Hinojosa.
Who were the attorneys in Charles Henry Krebs v. The State of Texas?
Plaintiff's attorney: Hon. Stephen B. Tyler. Defendant's attorney: Hon. Elliott H. Costas.
When was Charles Henry Krebs v. The State of Texas decided?
This case was decided on February 22, 2017.