United States of America v. Thomas Anthony Carnaggio, et al. |
Charlotte, North Carolina qui tam lawyers represented the Defendants accused of violating the False Claims Act. |
United States of America v. Oncology San Antonio, PA; CorePath Laboratories, PA |
Oncology Sa... More... $0 (04-03-2024 - TX) |
United States of America v. Zhiwei “Allen” Liao |
Zhiwei “Allen” Liao was ... More... $0 (03-25-2024 - CA) |
United States of America v. Patrick Esch |
|
Shauna Bohlken v. Landmark Hospital of Columbia, L.L.C. |
Jefferson City, Missouri qui tam lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a False Claims Act violation theory. |
Lori Monserrate v. Heartland Regional Medical Center, et al. |
St. Joseph, Missouri qui tam lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on False Claims Act violation theories. |
United States of America v. RDx Bioscience Inc. (RDx) |
Camden, New Jersey qui tam lawyers represented the Defendant accused for violating the False Claims Act. |
United States of America v. Empire Roofing, Inc. |
|
United States of America v. Cambria County Area Agency on Aging |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania qui tam lawyers represented the Defendant accused of violating the False Claims Act. |
United States of America, ex rel. Ann Keating v. London Bridge Trading Company, Ltd. (“LBT”) |
Columbus, Ohio qui tam lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on False Claims Act violation theory claiming that London Bridge Trading Company, Ltd. (“LBT”) failed to comply with the requirements of the Buy American Act (“BAA”), Trade Agreements Act (“TAA”) and Berry Amendment when selling textile-based products to the Department of Defense. |
United States of America v. Feast American Diners LLC and Dawood “David” Beshay |
Albany, New York qui tam lawyers represented restaurant own who violated the False Claims Act. |
United States of America v. Nostrum Laboratories Inc. and Nirmal Mulye, Ph.D. |
Boston, Massachusetts qui tam lawyers represented the Defendant accused of violated the False Claims Act by knowingly underpaying Medicaid rebates due for Nostrum’s drug Nitrofurantoin Oral Suspension (Nitro OS). |
United States of America v. AECOM |
New Orleans, Louisiana qui tam lawyers represented Defendant accused of knowingly submitting false claims to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the replacement of certain educational facilities located in Louisiana that were damaged by Hurricane Katrina. |
United States of America v. Rx Express of Panama City |
Panama City, Florida qui tam lawyer represented Defendant accused of unlawfully filled controlled substances prescriptions. |
United States of America v. Genomic Health, Inc. |
Brooklyn, New York civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant accused of violating the False Claims ACtby engaging in a nationwide scheme to improperly bill Medicare for certain laboratory tests used to diagnose and treat cancer patients. GHI is a wholly owned subsidiary of Exact Sciences Corporation, which acquired GHI in November 2019. |
United States of America v. Edgewater Systems for Balanced Living, Inc. |
Hammond, Indiana qui tam lawyers represented the Defendant accused of fraudulently billing the Indiana Medicaid program. |
United States of America v. Clearlake Oaks County Water District |
San Francisco, California civil litigation lawyers represented the Defendant accused of failing to federal and state grant funds that it received, but was not entitled to keep. |
Krystin Butler ex rel. United States of America, et al. v. Michael K. Chrism, II and Mile High Psychiatry, LLC |
Denver, Colorado fraud claim defense lawyer represented Defendants charged with violating the False Claims Act. |
United States of America v. Evoke Neuroscience, Inc. and David Hagedorn, Ph.D. |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania qui tam litigation lawyers represented Defendants accused of violating the False Claims Act. |
United States of America v. Rajendra Bothra, M.D., Pain Center USA, P.L.L.C. and Interventional Pain Center, P.L.L.C. |
Detroit, Michigan civil litigation lawyer represented Defendant with violating the Qui Tam False Claims Act by billing Medicare and Medicaid for for unnecessary treatments, drug tests and braces. |
United States of America v. Lincare Holdings, Inc. |
Spokane, Washington civil litigation lawyers represented accused of fraudulently overbilling Medicare and Medicare Advantage Plans for oxygen equipment. |
United States of America v. Evoke Neuroscience, Inc. and David Hagedorn |
Gulfport, Mississippi civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant accused of violating the False Claims Act. |
United States of America v. Chade Wade |
Panama City, Florida qui tam lawyer represented Defendant accused of violating the False Claims Act (“FCA”) by knowingly providing false information in support of multiple Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) and Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program (“EIDL”) loans |
United States of America v. Air Methods Corporation |
Lexington, Kentucky criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with failing to return known overpayments received from Medicare, Kentucky Medicaid, Tricare, and the Department of Veterans Affairs in violation of the False Claims Act. |
United States of America ex rel. J. Douglas Strauser v. Stephen L LaFrance Holdings Inc., et al. |
Tulsa Oklahoma whistleblower lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on a false claims act violation theory. |
Next Page |