Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 10-29-2021

Case Style:

Eddie Bolden v. City of Chicago, et al.

Case Number: 1:17-cv-00417

Judge: Steven C. Seeger

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (Cook County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:


Best Chicago Civil Rights Lawyer Directory


Defendant's Attorney: John F. Gibbons, Elizabeth Susan Ralph, Kyle L Flynn and Tiffany S. Fordyce for The City of Chicago


Andrew M. Hale, Amy A. Hijjawi, Brian J Stefanich Jennifer Bitoy Mohammed Khan, Shneur Z. Nathan and Barrett Elizabeth Boudreaux for Michael Baker TERMINATED: 09/25/2018, Barbara Temple TERMINATED: 06/19/2018, Joseph Barnes TERMINATED: 06/19/2018, Michael RowanTERMINATED: 06/19/2018, William Higgins
TERMINATED: 04/19/2017, James Oliver, Angelo Pesvento, Edward Siwek


James Vincent Daffada, homas More Leinenweber, Kevin Edward Zibolski and Michael Francis Bonaguro for Edward Hicks TERMINATED: 01/11/2018


George E. Becker for TERMINATED: 02/15/2018
>{?

Description: Chicago, IL: Personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued The City of Chicago and others on civil rights violation theories claiming he was wrongfully convicted of murder and spent 23 years in prison before being exonerated.

Eddie Bolden, age 51, claimed that he was convicted as a result of ineffective representation. The Illinois court of appeals found in his favor and issues a certificate of innocence.

Plaintiff claimed that he was framed in the killings of 24-year-old Derrick Frazier and 23-year-old Irving Clayton.

Outcome: 10/29/2021 613 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The jury will resume deliberations at 9:30 this morning in room 1023. The room is fully equipped with all of the admitted exhibits (through the JERS system). The Court will keep the parties posted. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) (Entered: 10/29/2021)
10/29/2021 614 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The Court received a note from a juror confirming that the jury has reached a verdict. Counsel and the parties must convene in Judge Seeger's courtroom on the 23rd floor. Counsel and the parties should appear in the courtroom no later than noon, if not before. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) (Entered: 10/29/2021)
10/29/2021 615 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The jury returned a verdict after completing deliberations at 10:30 a.m. The Court assembled the parties and counsel, received the verdict, and read it into the record. On Count I (due process), the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff and against all Defendants. On Count II (pretrial detention without probable cause), the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff and against all Defendants. On Count III (failure to intervene), the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff and against all Defendants. On Count IV (conspiracy to violate constitutional rights), the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff and against all Defendants. On Count V (malicious prosecution), the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff and against all Defendants. On Count VI (intentional infliction of emotional distress), the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff and against all Defendants. On Count VII (civil conspiracy), the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff and against all Defendants. The jury awarded Plaintiff Bolden compensatory damages in the amount of $25,000,000. The jury awarded Plaintiff Bolden punitive damages against Defendant Pesavento in the amount of $100,000. The jury awarded Plaintiff Bolden punitive damages against Defendant Oliver in the amount of $100,000. The Court polled the jury. The Court confirmed unanimity, accepted the verdict, and discharged the jury. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) (Entered: 10/29/2021)
10/29/2021 616 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: At the close of Plaintiff's case on October 25, 2021, Defendants orally moved for directed verdict. With the Court's permission, Defendants filed a supporting brief on October 26, 2021. (Dckt. No. 587 ) Defendants renewed their oral motion for directed verdict on October 27, 2021. Plaintiff's response is due on November 30, 2021. (Four weeks from the day of the verdict is the day after Thanksgiving, so the Court added two business days). Defendants' reply is due on January 7, 2022. Mailed notice. (jjr, ) (Entered: 10/29/2021)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: