Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

This case was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, 230301724, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.

Defendan... More...   $0 (11-02-2023 - PA)

Lexington, North Carolina criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with murder.

¶ 1 In the early morning hours of 2 August 2015, a Davidson County 911 operator received a call regarding an incident at 160 Panther Creek Court. The caller, Thomas Martens (Tom), reported that his son-in-law, Jason Corbett (Jason), "got in a fight" with his daughter, Molly Martens Corbett ... More...   $0 (10-30-2023 - NC)

Waco, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories.

Plaintiff Dolores Lozano (“Lozano”) brought claims against Baylor University (“Baylor”), Briles, Ian McCaw (“McCaw”), Art Briles (“Briles”), and the City of Waco.[1] (Second Am. Compl., Dkt. 50). Lozano's second amended complaint alleges violations of Titl... More...   $270000 (10-26-2023 - TX)

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories.


Plaintiffs allege that, on August 28, 2021, Village of Lyons Police Officers J. Barajas and P. Frencl, along with unknown other officers, paramedics, and fire department personnel, were investigating a discovery of human remains within the Village of Lyons,... More...   $0 (10-26-2023 - IL)

Jackson, Mississippi personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983 claiming $9.99 million in damages.


In the early daylight hours of January 27, 2018, Crystalline Barnes was driving her red Pontiac in Jackson, Mississippi. City of Jackson Police Officer Rakasha Adams says she observed Ms. Barnes run a... More...   $0 (10-25-2023 - MS)

Nachetz, Mississippi personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who used the Defendants on prison civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.... More...   $0 (10-25-2023 - MS)

Charleston, West Virginia civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a prisoner civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983. ... More...   $0 (10-24-2023 - WV)

Eugene, Oregon personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the defendants on prisoner civil rights theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.


This action arises from an encounter between Jose Artemio Carmona-Perez and police officers on February 28, 2018, in Salem, Oregon. Plaintiff Carmona-Perez (“Plaintiff”) filed suit against Defendants City of Salem, Sergeant Michael Baske... More...   $0 (10-20-2023 - OR)

Eugene, Oregon civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

This case was filed in the Marion County Circuit Court, 22CV39657, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

"Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code (42 U.S.C. § 1983) is a federal law that allows individuals to sue ... More...   $0 (10-20-2023 - OR)

Rochester, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a prisoner civil rights violation theory undeer 42 U.S.C. 1983.

Plaintiff Chiwana Crandell ("Plaintiff") brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Department of Corrections and Community Supervision ("DOCCS") employees Kevin Ross and Gary Cooper, DOCCS Acting Commissioner An... More...   $0 (10-11-2023 - NY)

Brooklyn, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a civil rights violation under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

Plaintiff claimed that he was wrongfully convicted of murder in 1997 as a direct result of the DA paying a witness to testify against him.



... More...   $1 (10-04-2023 - NY)

New Haven, Connecticut civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

In June 1998, GBTA hired Perkins, who identifies as African American, as a bus operator. L.R. 56(a)2 Statement of Facts ¶¶ 1-2, ECF No. 47 (“Pl.'s SMF”); L.R. 56(a)1 Statement of Facts ¶ 1, ECF No. 36-2 (“Defs.' SMF”). Bus operators a... More...   $0 (09-29-2023 - CT)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

In this action, Plaintiff, a retired U.S. Army officer, brought a claim for relief based upon Defendant's alleged violation of the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq. Defendant is an agency of the United States... More...   $0 (09-29-2023 - OK)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.


This case arises out of the non-fatal shooting of plaintiff Lorenzo Clerkley, Jr. (Clerkley) by defendant Kyle Holcomb (Holcomb), a sergeant with the Oklahoma City Police Department (OCPD). Clerkley has sued Holcomb under 42 U.S.C. § 198... More...   $0 (09-29-2023 - OK)

Chicago, Illinois civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.


Plaintiff Jane Doe was an Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) inmate from March 2015 to July 2018 and was housed at Logan Correctional Center from March 2015 to August 2017. In August 2018, Plaintiff filed a Complaint (d/e 1) pursuant... More...   $19000000 (09-27-2023 - IL)

Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on civil rights wrongful death violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

Vicki Timpa, individually and as representative of the Estate of Anthony Timpa, sued the Defendants claiming that they used excessive force in dealing with Anthony Timpa with the result that he was killed.

On August 10, 2... More...   $1000000 (09-27-2023 - TX)

New York City, New York civil rights layers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on job discrimination theories.

Plaintiff, Eddy Toussaint, brings this employment discrimination action against Defendants, the City of New York (the “City”), the New York City Department for the Aging (“DFTA”), Caryn Resnick, Sal Rullan, Kamlesh Patel, Jack Rizzo, and John and Jane Does,... More...   $0 (09-21-2023 - NY)

New York City, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.C.S. 1983.

?Excessive force law is a complex area of law that governs the use of force by law enforcement officers. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, and the Supreme Court has held th... More...   $0 (09-21-2023 - NY)

New York City, New York pro se Plaintiff filed suit without a lawyer claiming the Defendants on civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

Excessive force law is a complex area of law that governs the use of force by law enforcement officers. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, and the Supreme Court has held that this inc... More...   $0 (09-21-2023 - NY)

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories.

Officers Stacey Gonzalez and Pavel Reznik, who are Jewish, filed this action on November 20, 2018.2 The Complaint included allegations of anti-Semitic comments and disparate treatment as compared to non-Jewish officers.3 The original Complaint contained t... More...   $0 (09-16-2023 - PA)

Raleigh, North Carolina civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983.... More...   $0 (09-15-2023 - NC)

New York City, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants claiming his civil rights were violated by the Defendants.


Plaintiff Kiyee Kye brings this action against defendants Jonathan Dones, Kachun Chueng, Michael Maloney, Maureen Carey, James Shouldis, Danielle Ambrecht, Michael Collarini, and Mayko Matos, all officers of the New York City Police ... More...   $0 (09-15-2023 - NY)

Little Rock, Arkansas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a sex discrimination theory.

On June 24, 2019, Plaintiff Kimberly Adams brought this sex discrimination action against her former employer, the City of Little Rock, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fourteenth Amendment, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983.[1] In addition to damages, Dr. Ada... More...   $11817 (09-15-2023 - AR)

Fayetteville, Arkansas pro se Plaintiff without a lawyer sued Defendants on prisoner civil rights violation theories.

Prisoner civil rights law is the body of law that protects the civil rights of people who are incarcerated. These rights are derived from the Constitution, federal statutes, and state laws.

The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punis... More...   $0 (09-15-2023 - AR)

New Albany, Indiana civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants a Fourth Amendment false imprisonment theory.


In several encounters with police, Mark Anthony White ("Mark White") misidentified himself as his brother, Plaintiff Brenden Marnae White ("Brenden White"). As a result, Brenden White was charged in Clark County, Indiana, and subsequently arrested based on ... More...   $0 (09-15-2023 - IN)