Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) violation theories.

42 U.S.C. 12101 provides, in part:

It is the purpose of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to:

(1) to provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilit... More...   $0 (04-19-2022 - OK)

San Francisco, California employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on civil rights job discrimination theories.

Plaintiff, a former African America elevator operator, worked for Tesla. He claimed that Defendants "ignored racial epithets and graffiti that created a hostile work environment. The plaintiff, who was contracted to work through a staffing agency in 20... More...   $13500000 (04-19-2022 - CA)

New Haven, Connecticut civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1201, which provides, in part:

The Congress finds that—

(1) physical or mental disabilities in no way diminish a person's right to fully participate in all aspects of society, yet many people with physical or mental di... More...   $0 (04-16-2022 - CT)

Omaha, Nebraska civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) violation theories.

John Gruttemeyer claimed his former employer, the Transit Authority of the
City of Omaha (Metro), discriminated against him based on disability and retaliated
against him for protected activity when it terminated him in 2016. A jury found inMore...   $0 (04-14-2022 - NE)

Trenton, New Jersey civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory.

21 U.S.c. 12101 Findings and purpose
(a) Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) physical or mental disabilities in no way diminish a person's right to fully participate in all aspects of society, yet many people with physical or ... More...   $0 (04-11-2022 - NJ)

Seattle, Washington employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on a family medical leave act civil rights violation theory.


This matter comes before the Court on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff Richard Mooney filed a motion for summary judgment on some of Defendant's affirmative defenses. Dkt. No. 26. Mooney also filed a motion for summ... More...   $0 (04-05-2022 - WA)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on job discrimination theories under 42 U.S.C. 2000e, which provides, in part:

It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer—

(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, condi... More...   $1 (04-04-2022 - OK)

Camden, New Jersey civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an employment discrimination theory.

"McLane Company, Inc. is one of the largest supply chain services leaders in the United States, providing grocery and foodservice solutions for convenience stores, mass merchants, drug stores and chain restaurants. Through McLane Grocery and McLane Foodservice, McLane ... More...   $1 (03-31-2022 - NJ)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on civil rights job discrimination theories under 42 U.S.C. 2000e.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the The District Court of Cleveland County, CJ-20-00614, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
... More...   $0 (03-30-2022 - OK)

New York, New York employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights violation job discrimination (age) theory.... More...   $0 (03-25-2022 - NY)

New York, New York employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on civil rights violation job discrimination theory.... More...   $1 (03-24-2022 - NY)

Muskogee, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an employment discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e.... More...   $1 (03-23-2022 - OK)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights Americans with Disabilities Act job discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e.

The claims made and defenses asserted are not available for this case.

This case was initially filed in the Oklahoma County District Court, CJ-20-05947, and was removed to federal court by the De... More...   $1 (03-17-2022 - OK)

Las Vegas, Nevada employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory claiming that Defendant violation 42 U.S.C. 2000e.... More...   $0 (03-07-2022 - NV)

Lincoln, Nebraska employment lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of employment discrimination. ... More...   $0 (03-02-2022 - NE)

Little Rock, Arkansas civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on job discrimination in employement theories pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2000e claiming that she was discriminated against in retaliation for actions she took as interim superintendent of the Little Rock Schools in 2017. ... More...   $650000 (02-26-2022 - AR)

Fresno, California civil litigation lawyer represented Defendants accused of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for their refusal to provide routine medical care to a patient because the patient has HIV. Title III of the ADA prohibits doctors and other health care providers from discriminating against people with disabilities, including HIV.

One lawsuit alleged that Dr.... More...   $0 (02-22-2022 - CA)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e.

This case was initially filed in the Tulsa Cty Dist Ct, CJ-19-01995, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant. ... More...   $1 (02-21-2022 - OK)

Springfield, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a defamation, discrimination and breach of privacy.

Samantha Cherry alleged that the CEO of Cox Health, Steven Edwards, discriminated against her, defamed her and breached her privacy on Twitter.

While trying to schedule a virtual visit for her son, Cherry was instructed to use the promoco... More...   $0 (02-21-2022 - MO)

Dubuque, Iowa civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on sexual harassment and gender discrimination under the Iowa Civil Rights Act.

Jami Boss claimed that she was sexually harassed and discriminated against.

Boss has worked for the Dubuque Fire Department since 2011 and now is a fire equipment operator.

... More...   $575000 (02-20-2022 - IA)

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000.

This case was initially filed in the Rogers Cty Dist Ct, CJ-18-00370, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.... More...   $0 (02-18-2022 - OK)