David Christopher Cornelius v. Wyndham Hotel & Resorts, Inc., et al. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) violation theories. |
Demetric Di-az v. Tesla, Inc., et al. |
San Francisco, California employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on civil rights job discrimination theories. |
Shyanne Van Allen v. Career Training Specialists, LLC, d/b/a Stone Academy |
New Haven, Connecticut civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1201, which provides, in part: |
John Gruttenmeyer v. Transit Authority, of the City of Omaha, et al. |
Omaha, Nebraska civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) violation theories. |
Brain Henderson v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al. |
Trenton, New Jersey civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory. |
Garrett Loomis vs. Scott Bowers and Lea Booker |
|
Richad Mooney v. Roler Bearing Company of America, Inc. |
Seattle, Washington employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on a family medical leave act civil rights violation theory. |
Reginald Cathey v. Sheriff Vic Regalado, et al. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on job discrimination theories under 42 U.S.C. 2000e, which provides, in part: |
Jamilah McCoy v. McLane Company, Inc., et al. |
Camden, New Jersey civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an employment discrimination theory. |
Christina Martin Boyle v. FedEx Corp., et al. |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on civil rights job discrimination theories under 42 U.S.C. 2000e. |
YUDI HERNANDEZ (STEPHEN BRAVE) v. BRAD PISTOTNIK and BRIAN PISTOTNIK |
|
Rowshan Jamil v. TSC Food Service, Inc., d/b/a Wendy's |
New York, New York employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights violation job discrimination (age) theory.... More... $0 (03-25-2022 - NY) |
City of Richland Hills, Texas v. Barbara Childress |
|
Osmond G. Cousins v. Faculty Home Columbia University, et al. |
New York, New York employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on civil rights violation job discrimination theory.... More... $1 (03-24-2022 - NY) |
Patsy Shankles v. Falconhead Property Owners Association, Inc. |
Muskogee, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an employment discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e.... More... $1 (03-23-2022 - OK) |
Doris L. Clewis v. Target Corporation |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights Americans with Disabilities Act job discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e. |
Jessica Clarke v. Loomis Armored US, LLC |
Las Vegas, Nevada employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory claiming that Defendant violation 42 U.S.C. 2000e.... More... $0 (03-07-2022 - NV) |
Luis Lucar v. Pillen Family Farms, Inc. |
Lincoln, Nebraska employment lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a civil rights theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of employment discrimination. ... More... $0 (03-02-2022 - NE) |
Janacie Hargrove Warren v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. |
Little Rock, Arkansas civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on job discrimination in employement theories pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2000e claiming that she was discriminated against in retaliation for actions she took as interim superintendent of the Little Rock Schools in 2017. ... More... $650000 (02-26-2022 - AR) |
United States of America v. Umaima Jamaluddin, MD, and Chibuike Enyereibe Anucha, MD, PC, |
Fresno, California civil litigation lawyer represented Defendants accused of violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for their refusal to provide routine medical care to a patient because the patient has HIV. Title III of the ADA prohibits doctors and other health care providers from discriminating against people with disabilities, including HIV. |
Sharon Shaw v. Crossmark, Inc. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e. |
Samantha Cherry v. Cox Health and Steve Edwards |
Springfield, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a defamation, discrimination and breach of privacy. |
Jami Boss v. City of Dubuque and Fire Chief Rick Steines |
Dubuque, Iowa civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on sexual harassment and gender discrimination under the Iowa Civil Rights Act. |
Margarita Mercado Erwin v. Inola Independent School District 5 |
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000. |
Ronald Williams vs. City of Kansas City, Missouri |
|
Next Page |