Auto Negligence Law
 
Teresa Castro v. Walmart Stores, Inc., d/b/a Walmart Supercenter


Des Moines, Iowa personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.



Iowa property owners have a legal obligation to maintain safe conditions on their property. Both businesses and private citizens must eliminate hazards and unsafe conditions when they invite or license visitors to be on their property.

More...   $1 (07-03-2024 - ia)

Andrew Slabon v. Philip Ladisa


Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on intentional infliction of emotional distress theory.




Plaintiff also claimed defendant was stalking "young women [ sic ] tenants" residing in a nearby property that defendant "claims he 'manages.'" Plaintiff stated that while defendant claimed he was maintaining his property, defendant wa

More...   $0 (07-05-2024 - IL)

Phillip Trujillo and Salvador Gonzalez v. Roger Foster, et al.


Bernalillo, New Mexico indian law lawyers represented the parties in an employment law case.




{¶1} Plaintiffs Phillip Trujillo and Salvador Gonzalez were terminated from their positions with the Pueblo of Santa Ana's (the Pueblo) Police Department (the Department) and sued Defendants Roger Foster, Patrick Segura, Timothy
Menchego, Greg Aguino, and Bonadelle Ca

More...   $0 (04-23-2024 - NM)

Rayma C. Wright v. SF Markets, LLC d/b/a Sprouts Farmers Market


Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.



This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District, Clark County, Nevada, A-22-856164-C, and was removed to federal court by SF Markets, LLC d/b/a Sprouts Farmers Market

More...   $1 (07-03-2024 - NV)

Rodney Whiddon v. C-Level Trucking, LLC, et al.


Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.



This case was filed in the 13th Judicial Court of Navarro County, TX, C-22-30898-CV, and was removed to federal court by C-Level Trucking, LLC , et al.

Texas uses a modified form of comparative negligence (also known as "proportionate responsibility" in Texas)

More...   $1 (07-03-2024 - TX)

United States of America v. Trevon Demon Horne


Davenport, Iowa criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession with intent to distribute less than 50 kilograms of marijuana and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime

Quad Cities Man Sentenced to 126 Months in Federal Prison f

More...   $0 (07-03-2024 - IA)

Donna Hahn v. Coby Keilty and Timothy Keilty


Charleston, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.



This case was filed in the Georgetown County Court of Common Pleas, 2023CP2200106, and was removed to federal court by by the Defendants.

More...   $0 (07-03-2024 - SC)

Ferrell A. Hodges and Marquell L. Hodges v. Barbaro V. Garcia and Mega Trucking, LLC


Charleston, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.



In South Carolina, the negligence system is a "modified comparative negligence" system where you can collect even if you were partly at fault for the harm done to you.

More...   $1 (07-03-2024 - SC)

Vitzeslav Zeif v. Marina Aslanyan and SmartLinux Solutions, LLC


Charleston, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.



This case was filed in the Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, 2024CP1001305, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

The following facts are presented in SmartLinx Solutions, LLC's (“SmartLinx”) Verified Amended Complaint, and as

More...   $0 (07-03-2024 - SC)

Sheena Hayes and Morgan-Hayes v. Richard Penkoski


Bartlesville, Oklahoma family law lawyers represented the parties on protective order dispute.




¶0 This appeal originates from a protective order obtained by Petitioners, Sheena Hayes and Morgan Lawrence-Hayes, against Defendant, Richard Penkoski, based primarily on his posts on social media. Defendant appealed and we sua sponte retained the appeal.

More...   $0 (06-11-2024 - OK)

Sindy Maldonado v. United States of America


Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.



Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.


More...   $0 (07-02-2024 - PA)

Gregory Bryan Eames and Patricia Eames v. Williams Sonoma, Inc.


Camden, New Jersey personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.



To prove negligence in a premises liability case in New Jersey, the injured party must establish several elements: Duty of Care: Demonstrate that the property owner owed a duty of care to the injured person. Breach of Duty: Show that the property owne

More...   $1 (07-02-2024 - NJ)

James Edward Neumann v. United States of America


Albany, New York personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence theory.



In New York, you may bring a medical malpractice lawsuit for an injury you suffered against a licensed healthcare provider based upon their negligence, misconduct, errors or omissions, or breach of contract in the rendering of h

More...   $0 (07-01-2024 - NY)

David Luis Moreno v. Force Transportaton, Inc., et al.


Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.



This case was filed in the St. Francis County Circuit Court, 62CV-23-00151-3, and was removed to federal court by Force Transportation, Inc.

According Arkansas law, if you're found to be less than 50% at fault in an accident, your portion of the fault

More...   $1 (07-01-2024 - AR)

Janes Doe WHBE3, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.


San Francisco, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on negligence theories.



In 2020, plaintiff Jane Doe (later to become identified as Jane Doe WHBE 3) filed suit against Uber Technologies, Inc. and Raiser, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiary (together, Uber) in San Francisco Superior Court for claims arising out of an incident in Hawaii in

More...   $0 (06-24-2024 - CA)

David Carpenter, et al. v. Red Lion Trucking, et al.


Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.



A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sustained b

More...   $1 (06-04-2024 - OK)

Alaine F. Espinosa Castillo v. Sanchez Rosario and C.R. England, Inc.


Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.



A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sustained b

More...   $0 (06-10-2024 - OK)

Jamie Meyer v. Chyma Lumly


Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory



A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sustained by t

More...   $1 (06-28-2024 - OK)

Joseph G. Lee and Stephanie Campos v. Miram Abunow, et al.


Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence and auto insurance theories.



A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:

First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a d

More...   $1 (06-21-2024 - OK)

Christopher Kenned, et al. v. John Jay Schieber, et al.


Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on an auto negligence theory.



A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sust

More...   $25000 (06-17-2024 - OK)

Brian R. Hamen, et al. v. Lisa Marie Thompson


Enid, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.



The first element of negligence is a duty of care. This means that the defendant had a legal obligation to act in a specific way to prevent harm or injury to the plaintiff. The second element is a breach of that duty of care. This establishes that the def

More...   $1 (06-05-2024 - OK)

Dexy Sosa Martinez v. Cragi Catli and Lauren Johnson


Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.



In Oklahoma, the ability to pursue damages under comparative negligence applies when a crash victim is 49 percent or less liable for the accident. If a crash victim is at least 50 percent liable for the wreck, he or she can't seek compensation from other at-fault part

More...   $1 (06-12-2024 - OK)

Bradley Garrett v. Estate of Michael Ervin Kuglitsch, M.D., et al.


Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff us used on a medical malpractice negligence theory.


More...   $0 (06-17-2024 - OK)

Astrid Orellana, et al. v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints


Los Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories. a



This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, County of Clark, A-23-869450-C, and was removed to federal court by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint.


Nevada uses a legal principle called Modified Comparative Negligence. Thi

More...   $1 (06-30-2024 - )

Jennifer Arreola v. C.R. England, Inc.


Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.



This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, a-23-868245-c, and was removed to federal court by C.R. England, Inc.

Nevada uses a legal principle called Modified Comparative Negligence. This rule allows for the distribution of fault among all

More...   $0 (06-28-2024 - NV)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher