Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer Marc I. Simon represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer James R. Radmore represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was initially filed in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, case number 191102584, and was removed to feder

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer Dnaiel Purtell represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

Allentown, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer Joseph P. Bradica represented the Plaintiffs on auto negligence theories.

Brooklyn, New York personal injury lawyers John C. Merlino and Michael Krigsfeld represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

New York's contributory negligence l

St. Louis, Missouri insurance law lawyer Thomas E. Schwart represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming $250,000 in damages.

After Defendant, American Family Mutual Insurance Company ("American Family") offered to settle P

Fayetteville, Arkansas personal injury lawyers, Timothy J. Myers and Andrew Joseph Myers, represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Calims Act auto negligence theory.

Urbana, Illinois personal injury lawyers Bradley Alan Skafish and Jeffrey S. Deutschman represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Negligence describes a situati

Oxford, Mississippi personal injury lawyer Robert Eugene "Gene" Barton represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory claiming $1.5 million in damages and/or injuries.

Mississippi has a pure comparative negligence system. This means that you can still recover da

Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Selling Guns and Methamphetamine

California Man Sentenced to 87 Months in Prison for Selling Guns and Methamphetamine over Internet

Chillicothe, Missouri when Defendant Claude Mark Woodwoth was convicted of murder.

The Missouri Court of Appeals described the case as follows:

Mark Woodworth appeals his convictions by a jury of the murder of Catherine Robertson, assault in the first degree on her husband, Lyndel Robertson, burglary and two counts of armed criminal action. He was sentenced, respectively, to con

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer, Patrick Wigle, represented the Plaintiffs sued Exxon on product liability and negligence theories claimed that they were injured and/or damaged as a direct result of being exposed to benzene.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers Christopher Maxwell Deaneand Vanessa Lock represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liablity negligence theory.

This case was

Orlando, Florida person injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a corporate negligence theory.

Kylie McKenzie claimed that the U.S. Tennis Association of Florida failed to protect her from a coach who sexually abused her at a training center when she was a teenager.

The elements of a negligence case in Florida are: duty of care, causation, damages.

Boise, Idaho personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto neligence theoires.

Idaho follows the modified comparative negligence rule. Under this rule, a plaintiff (the injured party) can only recover damages if their percentage of fault is less than 50%. If the plaintiff is found to be 50% or more responsible for the accident, they cannot recover damages.

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

Arizona operates under a “comparative fault” rule, meaning that if someone is entirely to blame for the auto accident, they must take care of the resulting damages. In other words, liability for the crash falls on whoever caused it. But in some cases, it's not only one pers

Rapid City, South Dakota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

South Dakota permits a plaintiff to recover damages so long as their fault was “slight." Flipping this around, a defendant's fault must be “gross" (or great) for a defendant to be liable for a plaintiff's injuries. Lawyers call this “slight-gross negligence," and

Albuquerque, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Violent Albuquerque Crime Spree

Malachi Crockett Sentenced for Role in Violent Albuquerque Crime Spree

Los Angeles, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with operating a Dive Boat that Burned and Sank

Captain of Santa Barbara-Based Dive Boat that Burned and Sank, Resulting in 34 Deaths, Sentenced to 4 Years in Federal Prison

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim who shares the blame for a crash may recover compensation as long as they are not more at fault for the accident than the defendant. The accident victim's compensation is reduced bas

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.

A negligence cause of action is based on the claim that the defendant fails to exercise sue care and, as a direct result, the Plaintiff was direct injured and/or damages.

Plaintiff claimed that his wife Mary, who was a patient, at Tulsa Hills Community, Inc., failed

Buffalo, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a RICO theory for the damages and/or injuries he suffered as a result to taking a supplement that contained THC.

Plaintiffs Douglas J. Horn and Cindy Harp-Horn bring suit against Defendants Medical Marijuana, Inc. ("MMI"), Dixie Elixirs and Edibles ("Dixie LLC"), Red Dice Holdings, LLC ("RDH"), and Dixie Botani

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence insurance law theory.

The Plaintiff claimed that on October 19, 2022, she was involved in a car wreck caused by the negligence of an underinsured drive who failed to stop stock the rear of her vehicle injuring and damaging her.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Governmental Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

The Plaintiff claimed to have been injured and/or damages in a car wreck that occurred on March 4, 2022, on East 107th Street North when his vehicle was hit by a truck driven by a City of Owasso employee who negligently failed to yield the right-of-way to him