Philadelphia, Pennsylvania person injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.


In Pennsylvania, the comparative negligence system operates under the Modified Comparative Fault Rule, specifically the 51% Bar Rule. Under this rule, an accident victim can still recover damages even if they share some degree of fault for the accident, as lon

Scranton, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories claiming $1.06 million in damages.

A plaintiff can recover damages if they are less than 51% at fault. If they are found to carry more than 50% of the fault, they cannot seek compensation.

Duty of care: The legal requirement to act safely. Breach of duty of care: Failing

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Section 7102 of the Pennsylvania General Assembly contains the state's modified comparative negligence rule. It states that the plaintiff's contributory negligence will not bar his or her recovery, as long as the negligence does not surpass the causal negligence of the defendant.

Wheeling, West Virginia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

West Virginia premises liability laws apply a uniform standard of care requiring the exercise of reasonable care. An owner has a continuing duty to inspect the property to identify dangerous conditions and either repair them or post warnings as appropriate.

Wheeling, West Virginia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Wheeling, West Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

West Virginia is a modified comparative negligence state. Plaintiffs can be no more than 50% responsible for an accident to be entitled to compensation. If you are deemed to be 50% or less responsible, then you are able to pursue compensation for your total damages m

Grand Rapids, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful death auto negligence theory.

In Michigan, negligence laws use a structure called “comparative negligence.” Essentially, when you've been injured and you file a personal injury claim seeking damages, you must prove the party that injured you was at least partially at fault for your accident.

Charleston, West Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Under West Virginia's comparative negligence laws, an injury victim who is 50% or less at fault for an accident can recover compensation for their injuries. Their total amount of damages will then be reduced by the percentage that they were to blame for the acciden

Rochester, New York personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compensation for their injuries in proportion to the fault of others. Compensation is diminished by whatever percentage of fault is attributable to the injured party.

Syracuse, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

When you are injured while lawfully on someone else's property, the owner is liable for your injuries if the owner's negligence caused your injury. This is called premises liability.

Brooklyn, New York personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compensation for their injuries in proportion to the fault of others. Compensation is diminished by whatever percentage of fault is attributable to the injured party.

New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligernce theory.

New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compensation for their injuries in proportion to the fault of others. Compensation is diminished by whatever percentage of fault is attributable to the injured party.

Gulfport, Mississippi personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Mississippi has a pure comparative negligence system. This means that you can still recover damages even if you are 99% at fault for your injuries. In a “modified comparative fault" court system, used by the majority of states now, the plaintiff only recovers if they

San Antonio, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

According to Texas law, negligence cases are determined by the presence of a duty of care to the plaintiff. A duty emerges when the law establishes the relationship between the plaintiff and defendant, and a responsibility the defendant should have upheld.

Spartanburg, South Carolina personal injury car truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

To prevail in an action for negligence, the plaintiff must prove the following three elements: a duty of care owed by defendant to plaintiff; defendant's breach of that duty by a negligent act or omission; and. damages to plaintiff proximately resulting from t

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto liability insurance law issue.


Uninsured coverage protects the driver and other passengers in a vehicle for losses and damages suffered if injury is caused by the negligence of a driver who does not have any insurance to pay for losses and damages.

Trenton, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

New Jersey is a modified comparative negligence state, which, under New Jersey law, means that the person asking for damages in a lawsuit has to be less responsible for the accident than the person who allegedly caused the accident.

Wichita, Kansas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

The United States government has sovereign immunity, which means it cannot be sued without its consent. This is based on the legal doctrine that the sovereign (or king) was not liable to the people.

In 1946 the passage of the Federal Tort Claims

Las Cruces, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

The case was filed in the Third Judicial District Court, 22cv0638, and was removed to federal court by the Javier Vera and C & G Transport, Inc.

New Mexico is a pure comparative negligence state, meaning, the plaintiff may recover damages so long as they are not 100% at

New Haven, Connecticut personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Connecticut is one of the many states that have comparative negligence laws. As long as an injured party was not more than 50 percent at fault, then he or she can file a personal injury suit against the parties responsible. This is considered a modified comparative la

Burlington, Vermont personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the defendant on a negligence theory.

Contributory negligence does not bar recovery in an action by any plaintiff, or his or her legal representative, to recover damages for negligence resulting in death, personal injury, or property damage, if the negligence was not greater than the causal total negligence of

Savannah, Georgia personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories claiming more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Superior Court of Chatham County, SPCV21-00912-CO, and was removed to federal court by Central States Trucking Co. et al.

Under the law in Georgia, a tort is an “unlawful violation

Washington, DC personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

§ 16–2701. Liability; damages; prior recovery as precluding action.

(a) When, by an injury done or happening within the limits of the District, the death of a person is caused by the wrongful act, neglect, or default of a person or corporation, and the act, neglect, or default is s