Concord, New Hampshire personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a federal court claims act medical practice wrongful death negligence theory.

Concord, New Hampshire personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Modified comparative negligence. A plaintiff 51% or more at fault cannot recover. A plaintiff 50% or less at fault can recover in proportion to their amount of fault.J

Marshall, Texas personal injury lawyer truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence.

In Texas, negligent parties are held liable for any harms suffered due to their negligence. Commercial entities, such as rental car companies or ride sharing services, may also be found liable under some circumstances. Finally, strict liability laws may apply in certain cases, regard

Beaumont, Texas personal injury truck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence.

In Texas, negligent parties are held liable for any harms suffered due to their negligence. Commercial entities, such as rental car companies or ride sharing services, may also be found liable under some circumstances. Finally, strict liability laws may apply in certain cases, regardless

Shreveport, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Possession of Machine Guns.

Possession of Machine Guns Results in Federal Prison Sentences for Two Men

Opelika, Alabama personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Montgomery, Alabama personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Alabama adopted a pure contributory negligence statute, which means a plaintiff is barred from recovering ANY damages if they're even 1 percent responsible for causing their accident. Let's look at an example of an Alabama contributory negligence auto accident: Raymond is

Mobile, Alabama personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.

This case was filed in an Dallas County Alabama circuit court and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Plaintiff challenged the jurisdiction of the court.

Diversity jurisdiction refers to the Federal court's jurisdiction over cases involving a cont

Savannah, Georgia personal injury wrongful death lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory seeking compensation for the death of the father of K.E., a minor.

This case was filed in the State Court of Chatham County, STCV22-00211, and was removed to federal court by The Kroger Co.

The state of Georgia defines wrongful death as being the death of a person c

Augusta, Georgia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

BOJ of WNC, LLC is a franchisee for Bojangles' Restaurants, Inc. We are the largest franchisee in the Bojangles system, with nearly 100 locations.

Under the law in Georgia, a tort is an “unlawful violation of a private legal right,” and negligence is one of severa

Augusta, Georgia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Eleventh Circuit, 20-13864-E, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employee

Savannah, Georgia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the State Court of Chatham County, STCV20-02299, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Legal Definition of Auto Negligence in Georgia - This duty of care requires drivers to obey traffic laws, keep a lookout for other vehicles, and avoid d

Pensacola, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sue on product liability theories.

Sanofi US Services engages in extensive research and development efforts are focused on health care challenges in cardiology, oncology and internal medicine, as well as metabolic diseases, central nervous system disorders and vaccines.

Product liability focuses on the prod

Pensacola, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sue on a product liability theory.

More than a century ago, 3M started as a small-scale mining venture in Northern Minnesota, then named Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. Now a global powerhouse, our products improve the daily lives of people around the world.

Product liability focuses on the produ

Gainesville, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC develops, manufactures,, and markets pharmaceutical products. The Company was founded in 1950 and is located in Bridgewater, New Jersey. Areas that Sanofi US cover include cardiovascular disease, central nervous system ailments, and metabolic disorders.

Gainesville, Florida personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of the Eight Judicial Circuit, 01-02022-CA-003107, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Florida operates under a legal doctrine of “pure comparative negligence.” Under this doctrine, a driv

Orlando, Florida personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Jacksonville, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Fourth Judicial Circuit, Duval County, 2021-CA-001769, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.


Florida operates under a legal doctrine of “pure comparative negligence.” Under this doctrine, a driver's percent

Tampa, Florida personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court, Polk County, Florida, 2023-CA-0017894, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Florida operates under a legal doctrine of “pure comparative negligence.” Under this doctrine, a driver's percentage of fault will determin

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Tulsa, Oklahoma pro se Plaintiff attempted to represent herself on an a bullying theory.

GREENOUGH, KELLY M: CASE COMES ON FOR NON-JURY TRIAL. WINSTON BROWN, COURT REPORTER. YOLANDA TART PLAINTIFF PRESENT APPEARS AS PRO SE. DEFENDANT EMILY BABB PRESENT, REPRESENTED BY PRESTON BENNETT.
COURT HEARD PLAINTIFFS-COUNTER DEFENDANT CASE IN CHIEF, SIX (6) WITNESSES SWORN AND TESTIMONY TAKEN.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on auto negligence theories.

Miami, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence
theory.

This case was filed in the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, 24-002626-CA-01, and was removed to federal court.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful a

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on medical malpractice and nursing home negligence theories.

The plaintiff was appointed the personal representative of the Estate of Linda Kay Cervantes. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants provided substandard care to Ms. Cervantes, and as a direct result, she died from pneumonia and sepsis

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Plaintiff claimed to have been injured and/or damaged in a car wreck that occurred on September 12, 2021 caused by Defendant's failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle he was driving and failure to yield at a stop sign.