Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sue on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Mecklenburg County Superior Court, 22 CVS 17426, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

To bring a premises liability claim in North Carolina, you will need to prove the following elements: The property owner owed yo

Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

North Carolina's strict rules on determining fault in car accidents are known as “pure contributory negligence” laws. This means that the victim has to be 100 percent free of fault for the accident in order to receive compensation. Unfortunately, this task can

Raleigh, North Carolina personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Dare County Superior Court, 23-CVS-459, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

To bring a premises liability claim in North Carolina, you will need to prove the following elements: The property owner owed

Raleigh, North Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Robeson County Superior Court, 23-CVS-286, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

North Carolina's strict rules on determining fault in car accidents are known as “pure contributory negligence” laws.

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.


Premises liability stems from the duty of an owner of property to a visitor. The basic tenets of the law are the same. However, the circumstances leading to the claim are different. Some claims stem from a slip and fall in a restaurant or some other p

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a auto negligence theories.

Maryland remains one of the few remaining states to use this doctrine in assessing injury claims. Under Maryland law, a person who is found to be contributorily negligent may not recover ANY damages for their injuries, regardless of how minor their contrib

Baltimore, Maryland insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on bad faith breach of insurance contract theories.

Maryland law recognizes a tort cause of action by an insured party where an insurer refuses in bad faith to settle a third-party's claim against the insured. Mesmer v. Md Auto. Ins. Fund, 353 Md. 241, 725 A.2d 1053, 1061-62 (Md. 1999).The basis for the insurer's

Washington, DC personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the defendant on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, 2022 CA 001866 B, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Leedo Manufacturing is a Texas based manufacturing company.

Washington, DC personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, 2022 CA 000031 V, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Unlike most states, Washington D.C. is a contributory negligence state. Under contributory negligence rules, victims cannot

Alexandria, Virginia personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Fairfax County Circuit Court, CL-22-0013195, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Virginia law is clear that owners and/or occupants of a premises may be held liable for injuries caused to other people by

Norfolk, Virginia personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

Virginia law makes it clear that owners and/or occupants of a premises may be held liable for injuries caused to other people by the conditions on that premises. However, establishing the duty a property owner or occupant owes to an injured person requires a

Richmond, Virginia personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Henrico County Circuit Court, CL23-5112, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Virginia is clear that owners and/or occupants of a premises may be held liable for injuries caused to other people by the condit

Richmond, Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the General District Court for the City of Richmond, GV23004707-00, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Some states follow a more enlightened version of the fault law called "comparative negligence." Alas, Virgi

Abingdon, Virginia personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Tazewell County Circuit Court, CL21-291, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Virginia law is clear that owners and/or occupants of a premises may be held liable for injuries caused to other people by the co

Roanoke, Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Montgomery County Circuit Court, CL-22002004-00, and was removed to federal court by the Dfendant.

Some states follow a more enlightened version of the fault law called "comparative negligence." Alas, Virginia still chooses what is known

Shreveport, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Possession of Machine Guns.

Possession of Machine Guns Results in Federal Prison Sentences for Shreveport Men

Wheeling, West Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Under West Virginia's comparative negligence laws, an injury victim who is 50% or less at fault for an accident can recover compensation for their injuries. Their total amount of damages will then be reduced by the percentage that they were to blame for the accident.

Austin, Texas personal injury slip and fall lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was file din the 419th Judicial District Court, Travis County, TX, D-1-GN-23-008705, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

A premises liability action is a form of “negligence” based on a
premises defect theory. The eleme

Austin, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

In Texas, we are a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, you can sue for damages even if you are partially at fault for an accident. However, if you are found to be more than 50% to blame for an accident, you canno

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Governmental Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

The OGTCA applies to claims for “money damages” and is the exclusive avenue for liability. In more recent enactments, the Legislature has made it clear that liability must emanate from the OGTCA, not from “common law,” not from other statute

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a nursing home negligence theory.

Plaintiff claimed that Betti Louise Kramer was a resident at Emerald Care Center Tulsa until February 16, 2021 when she was transported to USU Medical Center where she died on February 18, 2021 was a direct result of not being properly cared for by Defendant's employees.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.

Accord to Plaintiff: She first saw Kevin Dux, DPM in July 2017 for left ankle paid and bilateral second tow deviation. Dr. Dux did not mention a bunion in his initial visit. He continued to treat Plaintiff for a period of three years before mentioning or discussing a bunion.

Bluefield, West Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

The elements of a personal injury claim in West Virginia are: Duty of care, breach of duty of care, damages and a direct casual relationship between the two.

West Virginia is a modified comparative negligence state. Plaintiffs can be no more than 50% responsibl

Charleston, West Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Under West Virginia's comparative negligence laws, an injury victim who is 50% or less at fault for an accident can recover compensation for their injuries. Their total amount of damages will then be reduced by the percentage that they were to blame for the accident.