McAllen, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Hidalgo County, District Court, 398 Judicial District and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

In Texas, is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, a plaintitff can sue for da

Mobile, Alabama personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

"Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC develops, manufactures,, and markets pharmaceutical products. The Company was founded in 1950 and is located in Bridgewater, New Jersey. Areas that Sanofi US cover include cardiovascular disease, central nervous system ailments, and metabolic disorders." Bloom

Mobile, Alabama personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on wrongful death theories.

James LePage and Emily LePage sued Mobile Infirmary Association d/b/a Mobile Infirmary Medical and The Center for Reproductive Medicine, P.C. on wrongful death theories claiming that they failed to maintain embryos in their possession.

* * *

"The plainti

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Criminal Defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Unlawful Possession of a Machinegun While on Supervised Release.

Chickasha, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Governmental Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

¶0 After an ambulance collided with a turnpike tollbooth, the injured toll-worker filed a lawsuit against the ambulance driver and her employer, the Jackson County Emergency Medical Services District. The medical district sought to dismiss

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma, case no. CJ-23-03997, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Plaintiff alleged that on June 14, 2022, she was seriously injured when the slipped and fell in a puddle of water left by a Coca-Cola refrigera

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with COVID-19 Relief Fraud.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, 230401220, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Under Pennsylvania law, a property owner owes invitees a duty of care to maintain the property in a reasonably safe condition

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

This case was filed in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 210401290, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Plaintiff Robert McManus (“Plaintiff”) brought this action against Defendants Walgreens Eastern Co. and the Bilco Company (indivi

Jonesboro, Arkansas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Lawrence County Circuit Court, 38CV-23-00045, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Plaintiff filed a motion to remand claiming that the federal court lacked jurisdiction.

Under Arkansas statute, damages are awarded in propo

St. Louis, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

Future Motion is a manufacturing company that designs and manufactures self-balancing electric skateboards.

Missouri product liability law provides that a person injured by a defective or unsafe condition of a product or due to negligence in the design, manufacture, sale,

St. Joseph, Missouri personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

Falcon Safety Products, Inc. is a family-owned company and the leading manufacturer and marketer of compressed-gas dusters and signal horns,...

Missouri law provides that a person injured by a defective or unsafe condition of a product or due to negligence in the design,

Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

Premises liability is a concept that holds property owners responsible for any harm that occurs on their property due to negligence or other wrongful behavior. In Missouri, this responsibility extends not only to the owner of the land but also anyone who has control over it, su

Los Angeles, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with COVID Jobless Benefits Scam and for Stealing Title to Dozens of Cars.

Franklin, Indiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with resisting law enforcement, criminal recklessness and auto theoft, all level 6 felonies.

Anthony “Tony” Lee Allen, 56, was charged with resisting law enforcement, criminal recklessness and auto theft, all Level 6 felonies, along with resisting law enforcement as a Class A misdemeanor, in Johnson Superior

Des Moines, Iowa criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with firearms straw purchasing and illegally possessing firearms and a machine gun.

Madison, Wisconsin personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability theory.

In Wisconsin, if a person believes he or she were injured due to a defective or unreasonably dangerous product, they may have a product liability claim. Product liability claims can be pled as negligence, strict liability, or breach of warranty actions.

Novo N

Wichita, Kansas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto
negligence theory.

The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) is federal legislation enacted in 1946 that provides a legal means for compensating individuals who have suffered personal injury, death, or property loss or damage caused by the negligent or wrongful act or om

Kansas City, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.

Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to causing the accident in which you were injured, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault.

Lincoln, Nebraska personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Federal Employer's Liability Act theory.

The Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), codified at 45 U.S.C.S. § 51-60, governs the right of railroad employees injured, sickened or killed in the course of their employment through an employer's negligence to sue the employer for damages.

Pierre, South Dakota personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

South Dakota has the “slight negligence” system in which the plaintiff may recover a proportionate fault share of his damages only so long as the trier of fact finds the plaintiff's negligence to be “slight” in comparison to the negligence of the

Billings, Montana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

Premises liability describes legal claims that can result from a dangerous condition on another person or business's property. The most common claims are slips and falls; however, many aspects can fall under this element of the law.

Boise, Idaho personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability theory.

Plaintiffs alleged that she was harmed when they took an anti-depressant drug known as Prozac, whose active ingredient is fluoxetine hydrochloride. Eli Lilly & Co. (Lilly), the sole defendant in all these actions, manufactured and marketed this drug, which is FDA-approved a

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

Under Utah's premises liability rules, a property owner can be held responsible for injuries to visitors. It does not matter if those injuries were intentional or unintentional. Property owners are liable if they fail to guard or warn visito