Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on medical malpractice negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Plaintiff underwent surgery at Saint Francis Hospital on September 24,2018 by Dr. Candice Meyer. The surgery, as scheduled and consented to by the Plaintiff was a laproscopic procedure w

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Oklahoma Premises Liability Law:

Duty of Care:

Landowners owe different levels of care to different types of visitors:
Invitees (e.g., social guests, customers): Highest dut

Stillwater, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Key Elements of Oklahoma Auto Negligence:

Duty of care: Every person in Oklahoma has a duty to act with reasonable care in any situation where their actions could potentially harm others. T

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Here's a detailed breakdown of negligence law in Oklahoma, covering key elements, principles, and how it might apply to different situations:

Key Elements:

Duty of care: Every person i

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Key Elements of Oklahoma Negligence Law:

Duty of care: Every person in Oklahoma has a duty to act with reasonable care in any situation where their actions could potentially ha

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.
"Here's a detailed breakdown of negligence law in Oklahoma, covering key elements, principles, and how it might apply to different situations:

Key Elements of Oklahoma Auto Negligence:<

Norman, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure of properly list the named insureds on a title insurance policy on real property purchased by Talma Arntz and Eerald Leon Arntz.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

"Here's a detailed breakdown of negligence law in Oklahoma, covering key elements, principles, and how it might apply to different situations:

Key Elements:

Duty of care: Every person

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Key Elements:

Duty of care: All drivers in Oklahoma have a duty to operate their vehicles safely and follow traffic laws to avoid harming others. This includes avoiding behavio

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Key Elements:

Duty of care: All drivers in Oklahoma have a duty to operate their vehicles safely and follow traffic laws to avoid harming others. This includes avoiding behavio

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Key Elements of Oklahoma Auto Negligence Law:

" Duty of care: All drivers in Oklahoma have a duty to operate their vehicles safely and follow traffic laws to avoid harming other

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Key Elements of Oklahoma Auto Negligence Law:

"Duty of care: All drivers in Oklahoma have a duty to operate their vehicles safely and follow traffic laws to avoid harming others. T

San Diego, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a car wreck caused by Cesar Loredo.

This case was initially filed in the Superior Court of California, 37-02020-00020680-CU-PA-CTL, and was removed to federal court by the United States Government on the claim against Ce

Concord, New Hampshire personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.


In November 2018, Anthony Cappello, a New Hampshire resident, purchased and ate a salad from Il Panino Italian Deli and Catering, a counter-serve deli in New Jersey. Within days after Cappello had returned home to New Hampshire he was diagnosed at a New Hampshire ho

Washington, DC personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant a premises liability wrongful death theory.

Plaintiffs Cameroon and Agnes Whiteru are the parents, and Cameroon is the personal representative, of the estate of Okiemute Whiteru, who died from injuries sustained at a Metro station here in Washington. Of particular significance is that Okiemute (first na

Fort Myers, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of auto insurance policy.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Plaintiff move to remand to the state circuit court.


A defendant may remove a case from state court

San Diego, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence wrongful death theory.

his case involves the arrest, incarceration, and eventual death of Gerardo Cruz-Sanchez. On February 4, 2016, Mr. Cruz-Sanchez was arrested and detained by the United States. Approximately a week later, after being detained at another

San Diego, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming more than $75,000 in damages and injuries as a direct result of a dangerous condition in a Wal-Mart store.

"California premises liability law revolves around the concept of the duty of care property owners owe to visitors. Here's a breakdown of k

San Diego, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Superior Court, San Diego County, CA, 37-02023-00035558-CU-PO-NC, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

"California premises liability law revolves around the concept of the duty of care property owners o

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

The Federal Tort Claims Act:

A federal statute that allows individuals to sue the U.S. government for injuries or damages caused by negligent or wrongful acts of its employees.
It waives the government's sovereign immunity in ce

Tucson, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a car wreck caused by a government employee.

The Federal Tort Claims Act:

A federal statute that allows individuals to sue the U.S. government for injuries or damages caused by negligent or

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence wrongful death theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a car wreck caused by the failure to exercise due care by one of Defendant's employment in the operation of a motor vehicle.

This case was filed in the Gila County

Sioux Falls, South Dakota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory claimed to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a car wreck caused by J.H., a minor.

Key Elements of South Dakota Auto Negligence Law:

Duty of care: Every driver in South Dakota has a duty to operate their

Rapid City, South Dakota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a car truck accident caused by Nicholas Alleman while driving a vehicle owned by Specialty Trucks.

Key Elements of South Dakota Auto Negligence Law:

Duty of c