Ocala, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the State Court - Marion County, 2023-CA-002178, and was removed to the federal court by the Defendants.

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory claiming $94,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, C-02-CV-23-000668, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Dave & Buster's Grand Sports Cafe in a restaurant and entertainment business headquar

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on an admiralty law theory under 28 U.S.C. 1333, which provides:

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of:
(1) Any civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all other remedies to which they are other

Greenbelt, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Prince George's County, Maryland, C16CV22001268, and was removed to federal court the Defendant.

"Maryland premises liability law is based on the principle that property owners have a duty to keep their

Greenbelt, Maryland personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.

New YOrk, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

"New York premises liability negligence law is based on the principle that property owners have a duty to keep their premises safe for visitors. This duty applies to both business and residential property owners.

To establish a premises liability negligence claim in

New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories.

"New York product liability law is based on a combination of negligence, strict liability, and breach of warranty theories.

Negligence

To establish a negligence claim against a product manufacturer, a plaintiff must prove the following elements

San Diego, California civil litigation lawyer represented Plaintiff on breach of contract theories.

The following facts are drawn from Plaintiff's motion and the Summary of Claim (“SOC”) section of a document submitted by Plaintiff to the FINRA arbitration panel. In April 2007, Plaintiff opened seven financial accounts with Defendant, into which he deposited over ten million dollars

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyer truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

"Arkansas follows a pure contributory negligence standard for auto accidents. This means that a plaintiff cannot recover damages if they are found to be any percentage at fault for the accident.

Here are some of the key provisions of Arka

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

"Oklahoma follows a modified comparative negligence standard for auto accidents. This means that a plaintiff's damages may be reduced by the percentage of fault they are assigned for the accident. However, a plaintiff can still recover damages even if they a

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a direct result of the design, manufacture and/or sale of unreasonably dangerous product.


"Torax® Medical, Inc. is a privately held medical device company headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota, that develops and

Elizabeth City, North Carolina personal injury lawyer lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a Jone Act negligence theory.

"The Jones Act is a federal law that requires goods shipped between U.S. ports to be carried on U.S.-flagged ships, crewed by U.S. citizens. It was passed in 1920 to protect the U.S. maritime industry and to ensure a fleet of ships that could be

Trenton, New Jersey personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability theory.

"New Jersey product liability law is based on the theory of strict liability. This means that a manufacturer or seller of a product can be held liable for injuries caused by the product, even if the manufacturer or seller was not negligent.

To succeed in a pr

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff in a wrongful death negligence action.

Elliott Earl Williams, died on October 27, 2011, after being arrested by Owasso police for causing a disturbance. Once in jail, he became paralyzed from injuring his neck and died without receiving any mental health or medical treatment.4 He left behind a surviving wife, but no children

Omaha, Nebraska personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on negligence theories claiming that they were injured and/or damaged as a direct result of a data breach. The Plaintiff sought class action status to recover individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated as a result of fraudulent credit care charges and identity theft.

Omaha, Nebraska personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the District Court of Washington County, Nebraska, CI 23-00159, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Plaintiff challenged the jurisdiction of the court and sought remand.

Nebraska is a modified comparative fault state

Waco, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories.

Plaintiff Dolores Lozano (“Lozano”) brought claims against Baylor University (“Baylor”), Briles, Ian McCaw (“McCaw”), Art Briles (“Briles”), and the City of Waco.[1] (Second Am. Compl., Dkt. 50). Lozano's second amended complaint alleges violations of Titl

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories.


Plaintiffs allege that, on August 28, 2021, Village of Lyons Police Officers J. Barajas and P. Frencl, along with unknown other officers, paramedics, and fire department personnel, were investigating a discovery of human remains within the Village of Lyons,

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories claiming to have been injured and/or damages by a defective and unreasonably dangerous product designed, manufactured and/or of sold to the public.

Illinois product liability law is based on the theory of strict liability. This means that a product manufacturer or selle

Natchez, Mississippi personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Adams County Circuit Court, MS, 22-KV-0014-B, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

"Mississippi personal injury premises liability law holds property owners and occupiers responsible for injuries that occur to visitors on t

Monroe, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire and bankruptcy fraud.

Avery Antron Goins, 44, of Monroe, worked in Ouachita Parish, Louisiana, in the auto brokerage and sales industry. According to information introduced in court, Goins registered two companies with the Louisiana Secretary of State, Avery’s Auto Brokerage in 2006 and 2nd Chance Auto

Huntington, West Virginia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on medical malpractice negligence theory.

"West Virginia medical malpractice law is based on the principle that doctors and other healthcare providers have a duty to provide their patients with reasonable care. If a healthcare provider breaches this duty and their actions cause harm to the

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Denver County District Court, 2022CV33567, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Colorado negligence law is based on the principle that people have a duty to act reasonably and avoid causing harm to others. If someone breaches thi

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

Colorado negligence law is based on the principle that people have a duty to act reasonably and avoid causing harm to others. If someone breaches this duty and their actions cause harm, they may be held liable for negligence.

To prove negligence, a plaintiff must estab

Eugene, Oregon personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the defendants on prisoner civil rights theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.


This action arises from an encounter between Jose Artemio Carmona-Perez and police officers on February 28, 2018, in Salem, Oregon. Plaintiff Carmona-Perez (“Plaintiff”) filed suit against Defendants City of Salem, Sergeant Michael Baske