Columbus, Ohio personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on product liability theories.


Plaintiff Aaron Stinson and Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc. filed various MILs to exclude evidence in this case. Now before the Court are (A) Plaintiff's MIL No. 2 to Exclude Evidence or Argument Concerning the Reason for Warnings on Any Material Safety Data Sheet

Columbus, Ohio personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability theory.

Ohio product liability law allows people who are injured by defective products to recover compensation for their injuries. There are three main types of product liability claims:

Design defect: A product is defective in its design if it is unreasonably dangerous to th

Hattiesburg, Mississippi personal injury truck wreck lawyer sued Defendant on a negligence theory.

"Mississippi car accident laws follow the standard “at-fault” system for liability. Under this system, vehicle occupants, motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians who suffer injuries in traffic collisions have the right to seek compensation for their injuries from liable parties. Liabl

New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant in an auto insurance liability theory.

This case was filed in the Civil District Court, Orleans Parish, 22-05143, C-10, and was removed to federal court by Defendant.

Plaintiffs challenged the jurisdiction of the federal court to president over the case and sought remand.

Sherman, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a negligence theory.

The case was filed in the 393rd Judicial District, Denton County, Texas and was removed to federal court by the
Defendants.

Plaintiff challenged the jurisdiction of the court and sought remand.
"Federal courts have jurisdiction over civil cases in a variety of situation

San Antonio, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories.

Texas is a modified comparative negligence state, which means that if you are partially at fault for an accident, your damages can be reduced by your percentage of fault. For example, if you are found to be 20% at fault for an accident, your damages will be reduced by 20%.

El Paso, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the County Court at Law Number Three, El Paso County,T, 2022DCV2338, and was removed to Federal court by Walmart.

"Premises liability in Texas is a legal doctrine that holds property owners responsible for injuries that occur on their p

Fort Worth, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Columbia, South Carolina personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Richland County Court of Common Pleas, 2023-CP-40-01299, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Huntington, West Virginia personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued defendant on medical malpractice negligence theories.

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.

Denver, Colorado civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on deliberate indifference theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.


On September 9, 2016, Marciano Briones was booked into the Adams County Detention Facility in Adams County, Colorado after being found guilty of driving under the influence. Docket No. 171 at 2, ¶¶ 1-2. On December 25, 2016, Mr. Briones felt ill

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued sued Defendant on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Tulsa Cty Dist Ct, CJ-22-00209 and was removed to federal court by Cyclone.

Plaintiff claimed that he was injured while working on an oil well located near Greenfield, Oklahoma when his hand was hit by a sledgehammer swung by an employee of Defen

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on September 8, 2021 on Alameda Street in Norman, Oklahoma.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on a negligence theory.

The Plaintiffs claimed that were injured and/or damages in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on October 17, 2020.

West Palm Beach, Florida personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach, Co Fl, 502022CA008485XXXXMB, and was removed to federal court by BJ's.

Plaintiff challenged the jurisdiction of the federal court over the case and sought remand.

West Palm Beach, Florida personal Injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 15th Judical Circuit, 50-02022-CA-003819- XXXX-MB, and was removed to federal court by Costco.

Plaintiff objected to federal court jurisdiction and sought remand.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury nursing home negligence lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants claiming to have been damaged and injured as a direct result of the death of Garmon L. Mercer who was a resident of Village on the Park on July 9, 2020 and fall and broke a hip which ultimately caused his death.

Plaintiff claimed more than $100,000 in damages.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on March 3, 2020 at the intereection of Elm And 91st Street in Jenks, Oklahoma.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on April 15, 2021 in Moore, Oklaoma.on SW 19th Street.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident.

The claims made by the Plaintiff are not available.

Defendant admitted that the accident occurred and that he breached the duty of due care in the operation of his motor vehicle.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on August 21, 2020 when a vehicle driven by Wheeler hit a vehicle in which Plaintiff was a passenger.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on auto negligence theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on March 17, 2021 at the intersection of U.S. Highway 77 and Slate Street in Noble, Oklahoma.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on May 15, 2019 in Norman, Oklahoma caused by Defendant's failure to exercise due care.

Norman, Oklahoma personal Injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Governmental Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on September 27, 2017 in Norman, Oklahoma.

El Reno, Oklahoma personal Injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on July 22, 2020 on I-40 in Caddo County, Oklahoma caused by Defendant's failure to exercise due care.