Baltimore, Maryland criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant who was charged with mortgage fraud and perjury.

The Defendant served two terms as the Baltimore City State’s Attorney from 2015–2023.
During her second term, her marriage began to break down. After deciding that
she would not seek a third term, she sought to “posture [her]self” financially for the

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory.

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is a US law that establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards affecting most private and public employees. Violations of the FLSA can result in significant penalties, including civil mone

Aberdeen, South Dakota criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of Sexual Abuse of a Minor
Kenel Man Convicted by Federal Jury for Sexual Abuse of a Minor

Shresbury, New Jersey personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability case.

This case was filed in the SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, MONMOUTH COUNTY, MON L 001450 25, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

In New Jersey, premises liability law holds property owners and those in control of property responsible for injuries sustained on their pr

Northampton, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant convicted in 1999 of possession of a firearm as a felon under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1); attempted extortion under 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a); and use of a firearm in furtherance ofa crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).

Derek Capozzi brings two challenges to the district court's disposition of his motion to vaca

San Antonio, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with one count of fraud or misuse of an immigration document. The two defend
Western District of Texas U.S. Attorney’s Office Adds 222 Immigration Cases

Olathe, Kansas personal injury lawyers reprsented the Plaintiff on a sexual abuse case.

In August 2021, A.S. filed a petition for damages and alleged that she was sexually abused as a child by Robert Bloom, her former youth pastor at Vineyard Church of Overland Park (VCOP). In addition to Bloom, A.S. named VCOP, Vineyard USA (VUSA), and Mark Warner as defendants in her claims of negligen

Wichita, Kansas family law lawyers represent man and wife in an adoption case.

"1. On or about December 17, 2023[,] Baby Boy [S.] was born in Wichita, Sedgwick [C]ounty[,] Kansas.

"2. [R.S.] . . . is the natural mother of Baby Boy [S.]. [R.S.] has filed a consent to allow Baby Boy [S.] to be adopted.

"3. In connection with the adoption proceeding, [R.S.] f

Mobile, Alabama criminal Defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with intentional murder, a violation of § 13A-6-2(a)(1), Ala. Code 1975, attempted murder, a violation of §§ 13A-4-2 and 13A-6-2, Ala. Code 1975 , attempted first- degree assault,[1] a violation of §§ 13A-4-2 and 13A-6-20, Ala. Code 1975, and discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle, a violation of § 13A-11-61, A

Birmingham, Alabama criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first-degree sodomy, see § 13A-6-63(a)(3), Ala. Code 1975, and sexual abuse of a child under the age 12 years old, see § 13A-6-69.1, Ala. Code 1975.

In November 2018, H.H., who was 10 years old and a fifth grader at McAdory Elementary, disclosed to her school counselor that her adoptive brother, 17-year-

Miami, Florida pro se Defendant unsuccessfully represented him self when charged with unlawful transportation of firearms.

Jonas Michel, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Part A of Amendment 821 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a retroactive amendment eliminating or re

Miami, Florida civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a First Amendment violation theory.

John Labriola was a media aide for the Miami-Dade Board
of County Commissioners. Labriola v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 693 F.
Supp. 3d 1284, 1287 (S.D. Fla. 2023). In his own name and on his
own time, Labriola wrote an opinion piece that criticized the
Equality Act, an as-y

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

LEWD MOLESTATION, in violation of 21 O.S. 1123(A)
and
LEWD MOLESTATION, in violation of 21 O.S. 1123(A)

A. It is a felony for any person to knowingly and intentionally:

1. Make any oral, written or electronically or computer-generated lewd or indecent proposal to any child under sixt

Cordell, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Lewd or Indecent Acts to a Child Under Sixteen, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2018, § 1123.

2023 OK CR 1, 526 P.3d 46:

¶4 The challenged evidence here met all of the factors required for admissibility under 12 O.S.2011, § 2414. In Horn v. State, 2009 OK CR 7, ¶ 40, 204 P.3d 777, 786, we required

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with f Rape in the First Degree in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2011, § 1114(A).

2022 OK CR 25, 519 P.3rd 526:

¶3 On the evening of October 20, 2017, M.P. went to Appellant's apartment and joined Appellant and other friends playing games and drinking. A.L, Appellant's girlfriend who also lived in the

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Sexual Abuse of a Child Under 12 (Count 1),1 in violation of 10 O.S.Supp.2002, § 7115.

2019 OK CR 23, 450 P.3d 969:

3 Proposition I: Brewer asserts the trial court erred in admitting the propensity testimony of A.K., J.H., L.R.N., and P.E.S. Brewer specifically contends the trial court abused its dis

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with First Degree Rape by Narcotic or Anesthetic Agent, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 1111(A)(4).

2016 OK CR 18, 387 P.3d 922:

¶5 Appellant fails to show actual error, let alone plain error, from the admission of the propensity evidence in this case. Malone v. State, 2013 OK CR 1, ¶ 41, 293 P.3d 198, 2

Norman, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with , for First Degree Rape in violation of 21 O.S.2001, § 1114(A)(3) (Count 1), and First Degree Rape by Instrumentation in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2007, § 1111.1 (Count 2).

2012 OK CR 7, 274 P.3d 161:


¶10 At trial, the State introduced evidence about an unrelated burglary at a residence of the

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charnged wiht Count I, Rape in the First Degree in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2008, § 1114; Count II, Forcible Oral Sodomy in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2007, § 886; and Count III, Assault and Battery by Means Likely to Cause Death in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2007, § 652, .

2010 OK CR 28, 250 P.3d 901:

¶6

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Plaintiff who was charged with Count 1: Rape by Instrumentation (21 O.S.2001, § 1111) and Count 2: Lewd Molestation (21 O.S.Supp.2002, § 1123 ).

¶7 Sections 2413 and 2414 were taken, almost verbatim, from Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 414, which were promulgated over a decade ago. While these provisions are perhaps not models

Wichita, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with recept and possession of child pornography.

Defendant decided to peruse Tumblr one night and found himself looking at a six-year-old boy’s genitals. Using the handle “tobeautifullwomen,” he chatted with Kyle Enzminger, whose handle was “kinkyolder53,” on the social media platform.
They discussed t

Las Cruces, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Deendant charged with production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(a), 2256(2)(A).

The Defendant entered to a plea agreement with the Government.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

FORCIBLE SODOMY, in violation of 21 O.S. 888

A. Any person who forces another person to engage in the detestable and abominable crime against nature, pursuant to Section 886 of this title, upon conviction, is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the custody of the Department of Correctio

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with:

SEXUAL ABUSE - CHILD UNDER 12, in violation of 21 O.S. 843.5 (F)


F. Any person responsible for the health, safety or welfare of a child who shall willfully or maliciously engage in child sexual abuse, as defined in this section, to a child under twelve (12) years of age shall, upon conviction,