United States of America v. Augustus “Gus” Shenker |
Little Rock, Arkansas criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with production of child pornography. |
United States of America v. Zachary Ryan Balusik |
Toldeo, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with receipt and distribution of child porn. |
United States of America v. Sayfullo Saipov |
New York City, New York criminal defense lawyers represented Defendant charged with carrying out a terrorist attack on Oct. 31, 2017, in the name of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), in which Saipov used a truck to murder eight victims and injure many more on a bike path in lower Manhattan. |
State of Texas v. Phillip Mabry |
Dallas, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with manslaughter. |
United States of America v. Conner Spells |
Syracuse, New York criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with attempting to entice a minor for sex and production of pornography. |
United States of America v. Jerod Schaffer |
Utica, New York criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with sexual exploitation of a minor, committing a felony offense against a minor while being required to register as a sex offender, and receipt and possession of child pornography, following a 5-day trial in Utica. |
Kayla Pike v. CRKSTL Transportation, Inc. |
Texarkana, Arkansas employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory. |
Mary Ellen Dayan-Varnum v. Kathryn Dayan,e t al. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on (1) civil conspiracy; (2) unjust enrichment; (3) negligence; (4) negligent supervision; and (5) constructive trust. |
United States of America v. Bryan Udale Jones |
Muskogee, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with Aggravated Sexual Abuse in Indian Country, which is punishable by not less than thirty years imprisonment. |
United States of America v. Muhammad Luqman Rana |
Greenbelt, Maryland criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with producing images and videos depicting the sexual abuse of children and for interstate extortion based on an online “sextortion” scheme. |
Anthony Ladd, et al. v. Nashville Booting, LLC |
Nashville, Tennessee personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on class action municipal code violation theory claiming that Defendant violated § 6.81.170(E) of the Code of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee (“Ordinance”)[2] stated that it was “prohibited and unlawful” for a booting service “[t]o fail to remove the boot within $0 (05-11-2023 - TN) |
Jill McVay v. Arkon Brass Company |
Akron, Ohio employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Family Medical Leave Act violation theory. |
United States of America v. Michael J. Zacharias |
Toledo, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with sex trafficking a minor. |
Murat Martinovic v. The Expansion Group, Inc. et al. |
New York City, New York employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on a Family and Medical Leave Act violation theory. |
Jeffrey Orr v. Tristate Note Repurchase Grup, LLC, d/b/a Wingate by Wyndham Fishkill |
White Plains, New York employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory. |
Amy Rae v. Woburn Public Schools |
Boston, Massachusetts civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on Americans with Disabilities Act violation theories. |
Hothman Misane, et al. v. City of Bangor, Michigan, et al. |
Grand Rapids, Michigan civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on employment discrimination theories. |
State of Oklahoma v. Gustus Andrew Glen Pennington |
Claremore, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with: |
United States of America v. Alexander Nicholaus Sweet |
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with coercing and enticing a minor for sex, production of child pornography, and possession of child pornography in violation of 18 USC 2422(b), 18 USC 2251(a) and 2251(e). |
United States of America v. Eric Whitebread |
Fairbanks, Alaska criminal defense lawyers represented Defendant charged with sexual exploitation of a child and distribution of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2252(a)(1) and (b)(1). $0 (05-09-2023 - AK) |
United States of America v. Alexander Nicholaus Street |
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with coercing and enticing a minor and production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2422, 18 U.S.C. 2251 and 18 U.S.C. 2252. $0 (05-01-2023 - OK) |
United States of America v. Craig Alex Levin |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with traveling to the Philippines to engage in sex with children as young as 12 years old. |
United States of America v. Trenton Powell |
Pocatello, Idaho criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant with eight counts of sexual exploitation of a child and three counts of receipt of child pornography. |
United States of America v. Deena Vang Lee |
Fresno, California criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with preparing and filing false tax returns, and committing wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. |
State of Oklahoma v. Jose Rafael Salcedo-Galindo |
El abogado de derecho penal de Tulsa, Oklahoma, representó al acusado, acusado de: |
Next Page |