| State of Nevada v. Tiktok, Inc., et al. |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiffs seeking a writ of prohibition or, alternatively, mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim in a consumer protection action. |
| Russell Jones v. City of Tempe, et al. |
|
Phoenix, Arizona civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking reimbursement for attorney fees expended in an effort to obtain body-camera footage of his arrest. |
| State of Arizona v. Trint Kleinman |
|
Holbrook, Arizona, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with three counts of sexual conduct with a minor, a class 2 non-dangerous felony. |
| Tom Koch v. UNUM Group, et al. |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3. |
| United States of America v. Bryant James Ross |
|
Pierre, South Dakota, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault and battery. |
| State of Nebraska v. Ivell M. Hagens |
|
Omaha, Nebraska, first degree sexual assault of a child, a Class IB felony 1; incest |
| United States of America v. James L. Hattten, II |
|
Omaha, Nebraska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sex trafficking a minor in violation of 18 U.S. 1591. |
| THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellant v. STEVEN LEON FULLER, Appellee. |
|
¶1 The State of Oklahoma appeals the order of the reviewing judge affirming an adverse ruling of the magistrate dismissing the criminal charges in Ottawa County District Court Case No. CF-2022-215 for lack of jurisdiction. See 22 O.S.2011, §§ 1089.1--1089.7; Rule 6.1, Rules of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, Title 22, Ch.18, App. (2024). |
| State ex rel. Matloff v. Wallace |
|
¶1 The State of Oklahoma, by Mark Matloff, District Attorney of Pushmataha County, petitions this Court for the writ of prohibition to vacate the Respondent Judge Jana Wallace's April 12, 2021 order granting post-conviction relief. Judge Wallace's order vacated and dismissed the second degree murder conviction of Clifton Merrill Parish in Pushmataha County Case No. CF-2010-26. Because the Respond $0 (08-12-2021 - OK) |
| State of Missouri v. Misael Covarrubias |
|
Columbia, Missouri, criminal defense lawyer represent the Defendant charged with with three counts of first-degree assault, three counts of armed criminal action and unlawful use of a weapon causing death or injury. |
| Abigail Zwerner v. Ebony Parker, et al. |
|
Newport News, Virginia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a gross negligence claim. |
| State of Indiana v. Mark Sanchez |
|
Indianapolis, Indiana, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with assault and battery with: |
| State of Wisconsin v. Clay Schueffner |
|
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with homicide by negligent operation of a vehicle, a Class G felony. |
| United States of America v. Dartez Omar Faulk and Rosalind Carol Comfort |
|
Raleigh, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Trafficking Young Woman . |
| Texas Department of Family and Protective Services v, D.V. |
|
Austin, Texas, family law lawyer represent Defendant in a parental termination action. |
| Brian Hoffard and Emmalyn Hoffard v. Marc Jones Construction, LLC d/b/a Sunpro Solar, aka Adt Solar, LLC |
|
Newports News, Virginia civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a breach of contract action involving an arbitration agreement in a contract. $0 (11-03-2025 - va) |
| State of Maine v. Heather M. Hodgson |
|
Augusta, Maine, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with |
| Alicia Rowe v. State Mutual Insurance Company |
|
Belfast, Maine insurance lawyer represented the Plaintiff who brought a reach-and-apply action that Rowe brought pursuant to 24-A M.R.S. § 2904 (2019).[1] See Ashe v. Enter. Rent-A-Car, 2003 ME 147, ¶ 14, 838 A.2d 1157 ("The reach and apply statute . . . enables a judgment creditor to have insurance money applied to the satisfaction of [a] judgment by bringing an action against the judgment debt $0 (09-30-2025 - ME) |
| Jane Doe v. Pediatric Dental Group, LLC, et al. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs class action wrongful disclosure of personal identity formation. |
| Moore Urban Renewal Authority v. Milton Cantrell, et al. |
|
Norman, Oklahoma condemnation action. |
| Adair County Board of County Commissioners v. Paul David Rutherford, et al. |
|
Stilwell, Oklahoma, condemnation lawyers represented the Defendants in an eminent domain action. |
| United States of America v. Jody G. Wong |
|
West Palm Beach, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with money laundering. |
| State of Maine v. Zane Ibrahim |
|
Portland, Maine, riminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with Class C criminal threatening, Class C reckless conduct and Class E terrorizing. |
| Veronica SanMiguel v. Meryl Y. Grimaldi, & c., et al. |
|
Bronx, New York, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who used on a medical malpractice theory. |
| Dr. Rachel Tudor v. Ezra Young and Brittany Stewart |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on an interpleader theory. |
|
Next Page |