| State of Nevada v. Tiktok, Inc., et al. |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiffs seeking a writ of prohibition or, alternatively, mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim in a consumer protection action. |
| Russell Jones v. City of Tempe, et al. |
|
Phoenix, Arizona civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking reimbursement for attorney fees expended in an effort to obtain body-camera footage of his arrest. |
| United States of America v. James L. Hattten, II |
|
Omaha, Nebraska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sex trafficking a minor in violation of 18 U.S. 1591. |
| MICHAEL GARY PARKER, JR., Appellant v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellee. |
|
¶1 Appellant Michael Gary Parker, Jr. appeals his Judgment and Sentence from the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CF-2018-3184, for First Degree Manslaughter, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 711.1 Parker's jury unanimously found him guilty, but deadlocked on the issue of punishment. The Honorable William J. Musseman, Jr., District Judge, who presided over Parker's jury trial, sentenced Pa $0 (07-15-2021 - OK) |
| State of Oklahoma v. Dustin Joel Walker |
|
Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer is representing the Defendant charged sexually abusing a child. |
| United States of America v. Dartez Omar Faulk and Rosalind Carol Comfort |
|
Raleigh, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Trafficking Young Woman . |
| United States of America ex rel. Diedra Gentry v. Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Pearland, L.L.C. |
|
Houston, Texas commercial litigation lawyers represented the parties in a qui tam whistleblower case. $0 (11-03-2025 - TX) |
| Texas Department of Family and Protective Services v, D.V. |
|
Austin, Texas, family law lawyer represent Defendant in a parental termination action. |
| Brian Hoffard and Emmalyn Hoffard v. Marc Jones Construction, LLC d/b/a Sunpro Solar, aka Adt Solar, LLC |
|
Newports News, Virginia civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a breach of contract action involving an arbitration agreement in a contract. $0 (11-03-2025 - va) |
| United States of America v. Denise Davis |
|
Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Conspiring to Defraud The IRS. |
| United States of America v. Byron Cordell Thomas |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of sex |
| Dr. Rachel Tudor v. Ezra Young and Brittany Stewart |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on an interpleader theory. |
| United States of America v. Jonathan Tylor Herra |
|
Anchorage, Alaska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sexual exploitation of a child and possession and access with intent to view child pornography. |
| Ryan Corbridge v. Encompass Indemnity Company |
|
Portland, Oregon, insurance lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on bad faith breach of contract theory. |
| Michael Pardi v. Tricida, Inc. et al. |
|
Oakland, California commercial litigation lawyers represented the parties in a securities law violation case. |
| Denali Summit, LLC v. Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri |
|
Jefferson City, Missouri, commercial civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in an easement dispute. |
| State of Oklahoma v. J.L.A. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| Jacquiline Pettitt v. The Procter & Gamble Distributing LLC |
|
Chicago, Illinois, Commercial litigation lawyers represented the parties in a breach of Contact actions. $1 (10-24-2025 - IL) |
| Penny Evans v. Fortune International, LLC |
|
Chicago, Illinois, civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Americans with Disabilities Act violaiton theory. |
| Bridget Krause v. PM. Mold Compnay, Inc. |
|
Chicago, Illinois, employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory. |
| Nasim Ghebart v. Nationwide Credit and Collection, Inc. |
|
Chicago, Illinois, consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment Act violation. |
| Amos C. Johnson, M.D., etc. v. Rita Elizabeth Johnson, etc. |
|
Detroit, Michigan, civil litigation lawyers represented the the parties in interpretation of a trust. |
| Strategy and Execution, Inc. v. Black Rifle Coffee Company, L.L.C. |
|
San Antonio, Texas, commercial litigation lawyers represented the parties in a breach of contract dispute. |
| Sage Architecture, Inc. v. Chris Lingle |
|
San Antonio, Texas, commercial litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a fraud claim. |
| Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Thomas Patak |
|
Boston, Massachusetts, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with smash-and-grab burglaries. |
|
Next Page |