Houston, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with immigration and border security
Fatal human smuggling case and two alleged MS-13 members among those charged in relation to immigration and border security

Greenbelt, Maryland civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff, which sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories claiming that an executive order signed by the President of the United States was an ultra vires act.

Judge Deborah L. Boardman ruled in favor of the five pregnant mothers who, along with CASA and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project (ASAP), filed a lawsuit to

Greenbelt, Maryland criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with committing an armed robbery while using, carrying, and brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence.
Charles County Man Pleads Guilty to Four Armed Commercial Robberies

Grand Rapids, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with False Claims Act Allegations
Medical Device Manufacturer And Its Owner Agree To Pay $550,000 To Resolve False Claims Act Allegations

Colorado Springs, Colorado civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff and the Defendant in a mechanic's lien dispute.

In 2021, JP Antlers agreed to sell the Antlers Hotel in Colorado Springs (the property) to BP Antlers Residential, LLC, which intended to convert the property into apartments.

Around the same time, Ourmark, LLC retained Bobby Hill Designs to provide specif

Grand Junction, Colorado family law lawyers represented the wife and husband in a dissolution of marriage (divorce) proceeding.

The Gundersons have been married for over twenty-five years but have been embroiled in divorce proceedings since 2015. They have also been embroiled in civil litigation spanning multiple states since at least 2017. The prior proceedings relevant to this appeal

Greeley, Colorado family law lawyers represented the wife and husband in a divorce.

The parties had two children and an ongoing contentious post-ligation litigation.

The latest dispute arose after father exercised parenting time with the children in late February through March of 2023. Upon their return to Oregon, one of the children told a teacher that he was confined while at

State of Mississippi criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first-degree murder with a firearm enhancement.

Stilwell, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

Patricia Traynor sued Orchard Road Community Outreach, Inc. and Carson Commercial Properties claiming to have been injured and/or damages while a invitee customer.

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyer represented the Defendant.

Sandusky, Ohio, civil litigation lawyers represented the Defendant in a breach of contraction subject to arbitration agreement.

On March 8, 2024, appellant and Barnhart Builders filed suit against appellees, Brian and Amber Stanley, and attached a copy of the contract between Barnhart Builders and the Stanleys as an exhibit to the complaint. The contract is captioned "Standard Form of Ag

Tulsa, Oklahoma commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff and the Defendant in a breach of contract dispute.

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff and Defendant in a breach of contract action.

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff and the Defendant in a protective order case.

Miller contends the evidence introduced at trial was insufficient to show that he either stalked or harassed Triplett. Further, he contends the trial court failed to act as a fair and impartial tribunal, because the court allowed a witness to stay in the courtroom after testify

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff and the Defendant in a protective order case.

On August 10, 2004, Petitioner, Neal Troutman, Chief of Bethany Police Department, filed a Petition for Protective Order against Defendant, David Eugene Martin, seeking relief under the Protection from Domestic Abuse Act [22 O.S. 2003 Supp. §60 et. seq]. In the form

Greenbelt, Maryland criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Pandemic Relief Loan Fraud and Commercial Loan Fraud
Maryland Man Sentenced to Federal Prison for Pandemic Relief Loan Fraud and Commercial Loan Fraud

Seminole, Oklahoma, family law lawyers represented the Plaintiff and Defendant in a protective order proceeding.

Plaintiff filed for a protective order pursuant to the Protection from Domestic Abuse Act, 22 O.S.Supp. 2006, §§ 60-60.18, based on domestic abuse as defined in section 60.1(1). Trial court granted plaintiff's petition based on a finding of harassment and explicitly found "no

Portland, Oregon, civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiffs seeking the return of information inadvertently disclosed to the Defendants.

The panel held that the district court, as part of its inherent powers to oversee discovery in cases before it, had authority to order The Oregonian to return or destroy the documents because, as an intervenor, The Oregonian was a party to the c

St. George, Utah criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Sex Trafficking
Southern Utah Man Facing Sex Trafficking Charges

Lafayette, Louisiana civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a breach of contact dispute.

The Garys sustained extensive roof damage when Humcane Delta blew through Lafayette Parish on October 9, 2020. The following day, the Garys met with a representative from Hollier Roofing. During this meeting, the Garys and Hollier Roofing signed an agreement to fix the damage. The agreeme

Tulsa, Oklahoma commercial litigation lawyers represented the parties in a breach of contract action.

Dallas, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Traveling to have Sex with Child
Florida Man Sentenced to 30 Years in Prison for Traveling to have Sex with Child

Florence, South Carolina civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff challenging city ordinance.

A city ordinance makes it a crime “to broadcast obscene, profane or vulgar language from any commercial property” above certain volumes at certain times. A bar owner sued, arguing the ordinance violates the First Amendment. This appeal involves only the portion of the ordinance restricti