Brownsivlle, Texas condemnation lawyers represented the Defendant in in eminent domain case.

Bennett contends that the government exceeded the scope of its easement
when it built the wall, that she therefore owns the wall, and that as a result
she is entitled to just compensation for the value of the wall. Bennett sought
to present expert testimony regarding the value of the w

Tulsa, Oklahoma eminent domain lawyer represented the Defendant in a condemnation case.

The Commissioners appointed by the Court assessed the Defendant's damaged from the taking at $135,000.

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation law lawyer represented the Defendant who was sued by the Plaintiff on an eminent domain theory seeking to obtain certain rights, title and interest in real property owned by the Defendant for public use.

The Commissioners appointed by the Court estimated the amount of just compensation needed to compensate the Defendant to be $200,208.

Sandusky, Ohio condemnation lawyer represented the defendant in an eminent domain case.

This appropriation action stems from an ODOT project to convert the intersection of State Routes 4 (Hayes Avenue) and 99 (Skadden Road) in Erie County, Ohio, from a two-way stop to a single lane roundabout. Neema owns two parcels of property abutting the routes to the west and east and totaling 8.9 ac

Fort Worth, Texas civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a planning and zoning case.

The City of Keller is one of several fast-growing communities on the outskirts of Fort Worth.1 As part of that growth, the City approved plans for two new subdivisions, Estates of Oak Run and Rancho Serena, including plans for storm water drainage.

The Wilsons own property southeast

Pauls Valley, Oklahoma condemnation civil litigation lawyer represented the Defendant in an eminent domian case.

Plaintiff sought relief from the Supreme Court to vacate Judge's order quashing a subpoena duces tecum. Defendant sent a subpoena to the Oklahoma Department of Transportation's (ODOT) expert property appraiser in an attempt to discover how much income the appraiser has receive

Owensboro, Kentucky condemnation lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on violation of due process theory.

The City of Madisonville condemned one of several mobile homes that Michael and Rebecca McIntosh own in their Kentucky town. The City demolished the property a month later. The McIntoshes filed this § 1983 action in response, alleging that the City deprived them of their due pro

Hsmpton, Iowa civil litigation lawyer represented the Defendant in a condemnation case.

This case involved damages awards related to a drainage ditch project undertaken in 2017 to deepen and widen the drainage ditch known as Drainage District No. 48 (DD48) in Franklin County. The district court concluded that the Franklin County Board of Supervisors (the Board) had not abandoned the origi

San Bernardino, California condemnation lawyers represented the parties in an eminent domain action.

The Town of Apple Valley (TAV) sought to condemn via eminent domain a private water utility system. In November 2015, TAV passed two resolutions of necessity (RON) to acquire the water system, which was then owned by Carlyle Infrastructures Partners and operated by Apple Valley Ranchos Wa

Sacramento, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant in a forfeiture action.

WHEREAS, a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem was filed November 15, 2024, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, alleging that the Approximately $42,323.00 in U.S. Currency (“Defendant Currency”) is subject to forfeiture to the United States pur

Nevada, Iowa eminent domain law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on an inverse condemnation theory.

Dodge City, Kansas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants.

On August 11, 2020, KDOT offered to pay the Apontes $63,605 to establish a right-of-way on property they owned along Highway 50 near Dodge City and to reimburse for damages that would occur during an impending highway expansion. The Apontes ultimately accepted the offer and signed a contract of

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer Andrew A. Shank represented the Defendant who was sued on an eminent domain theory by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation theory seeking to take the storage business for used to expand Interstate I-44 in West Tulsa.

The Commissioners appointed by t

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation law lawyer represented the Defendants who were sued by the Plaintiff on an eminent domain law theory seeking to acquire by the exercise of eminent domain certain rights, title and interest o real property owned by the Defendants for public use.

The Commissioners appointed by the Court assessed the damages caused as a direct result of the taking at $19,500.00.<

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer represented the Defendants sued eminent domain theories to acquire certain rights, title and interests owned by them in real property needed by the City of Tulsa for public purposes.

The commissioners appoint by the court reported that they were of the opinion that the defendant has suffered $2,000 in damages as a result of the imposition of a permanent

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on an admiralty law theory under 28 U.S.C. 1333, which provides:

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of:
(1) Any civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all other remedies to which they are other

Concluding that a defendant committed the tort of malicious prosecution, the Court awards $1,769,354 in compensatory, economic, and punitive damages in favor of a man the defendant falsely accused of committing gross sexual assaults and assaults against his then wife. The Court's verdict and judgment runs against his now ex-wife's friend, who conspired with his wife to concoct the allegations that

Denver, constitutional law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant seeking a declaratory judgment that Donald Trump violated the 14th Amendment on January 5, 2021 and should be barred from serving as President again.

Petitioners Norma Anderson, Michelle Priola, Claudine Cmarada, Krista Kafer, Kathi
Wright, and Christopher Castilian, eligible Colorado electors, bring t

This case arises out of the arrest, prosecution, and conviction of Plaintiffs Alfred
Chestnut (“Chestnut”), Andrew Stewart, Jr. (“Stewart”), and Ransom Watkins (“Watkins”)
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) for felony murder of a 14-year-old boy named DeWitt Duckett in
1983. (ECF No. 1.) On November 25, 2019, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City granted the
Plaintiffs

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories.

This case arises out of the arrest, prosecution, and conviction of Plaintiffs Alfred
Chestnut (“Chestnut”), Andrew Stewart, Jr. (“Stewart”), and Ransom Watkins (“Watkins”)
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) for felony murder of a 14-year-ol

Houston, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a taking of private property without just compensation (inverse condemnation) in violation of the Texas and United States Constitutions.

This case was filed in the 253rd Judicial District Court of Chambers County, 20-DCV-0300, and was removed to the federal court by the State of Texas.

The

El Reno, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff which sued Defendant claiming wrongful condemnation of its property and wrongful issuance of a notice to vacate Plaintiff's property.

Norman, Oklahoma condemnation lawyers represented Defendants who were sued by Plaintiff seeking to acquire by eminent domain certain rights, title and interests in their land for public used.

Houston, Texas eminent domain lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on an inverse condemnation theory.

This case was filed in the 253rd Judicial District Court of Chambers County, 20-DCV-0300, and was removed to federal court by the State of Texas.

Property Owners filed suits in Texas state courts claiming that the flooding of their land by the State of Texas constitu

Beaumont, Texas civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Sabine River Authority of Texas, et al. on inverse condemnation theories.

Federal Courthouse - Beaumont, Texas

More...   $0 (02-13-2023 - )

Find a Lawyer

Subject:

City:

State: Select State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington, D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Search

Find a Case

Subject:

County:

State: Select State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington, D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Search

Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher