Condemnation Law
 
United States of America v. Approximately $42,323.00 in U.S. Currency

Sacramento, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant in a forfeiture action.

WHEREAS, a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem was filed November 15, 2024, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, alleging that the Approximately $42,323.00 in U.S. Currency (“Defendant Currency”) is subject to forfeiture to the United States pur... More...
   $0 (12-20-2024 - CA)

Merle D. Brendeland v. Iowa Department of Transportation


Nevada, Iowa eminent domain law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on an inverse condemnation theory.


Several individuals owned a tract of land abutting an east-west highway near that highway's intersection with Interstate 35. When the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) announced plans to modernize the interchange between the highway and I-35, these landowners saw a deve... More...
   $0 (11-22-2024 - IA)

Juan Manuel Aguilar, et al. v. Suegundo A. Aponte Caceda, et al.

Dodge City, Kansas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants.

On August 11, 2020, KDOT offered to pay the Apontes $63,605 to establish a right-of-way on property they owned along Highway 50 near Dodge City and to reimburse for damages that would occur during an impending highway expansion. The Apontes ultimately accepted the offer and signed a contract of ... More...
   $0 (10-25-2024 - KS)

State of Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Transportation v. West Bank Storages, LLC

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer Andrew A. Shank represented the Defendant who was sued on an eminent domain theory by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation theory seeking to take the storage business for used to expand Interstate I-44 in West Tulsa.

The Commissioners appointed by t... More...
   $1371000 (05-22-2024 - OK)

City of Tulsa v. Geraldine Hunt, et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer represented the Defendants sued eminent domain theories to acquire certain rights, title and interests owned by them in real property needed by the City of Tulsa for public purposes.

The commissioners appoint by the court reported that they were of the opinion that the defendant has suffered $2,000 in damages as a result of the imposition of a permanent... More...
   $0 (11-15-2023 - OK)

Joseph Blacker and Andrea Memiki Ambrosia v. Bay Bridge Marina Slips, LLC, et al.

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on an admiralty law theory under 28 U.S.C. 1333, which provides:

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of:
(1) Any civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all other remedies to which they are other... More...
   $1 (11-13-2023 - MD)

Norma Anderson, et al. v. Jena Griswold, in her official capacity as Colorado Secretary of State and Donald J. Trump

Denver, constitutional law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant seeking a declaratory judgment that Donald Trump violated the 14th Amendment on January 5, 2021 and should be barred from serving as President again.

Petitioners Norma Anderson, Michelle Priola, Claudine Cmarada, Krista Kafer, Kathi
Wright, and Christopher Castilian, eligible Colorado electors, bring t... More...
   $0 (09-15-2023 - CO)

Talala Properties, LLC v. City of El Reno, OKlahoma

El Reno, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff which sued Defendant claiming wrongful condemnation of its property and wrongful issuance of a notice to vacate Plaintiff's property.... More...   $0 (06-19-2023 - OK)

City of Tulsa v. Arnett Starks, et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation law lawyer represented the Defendants who were sued by the Plaintiff on an eminent domain law theory seeking to acquire by the exercise of eminent domain certain rights, title and interest o real property owned by the Defendants for public use.

The Commissioners appointed by the Court assessed the damages caused as a direct result of the taking at $19,500.00.<... More...
   $0 (05-09-2023 - OK)

City of Oklahoma City v. David Furman Cosper

Norman, Oklahoma condemnation lawyers represented Defendants who were sued by Plaintiff seeking to acquire by eminent domain certain rights, title and interests in their land for public used.

... More...
   $0 (05-01-2023 - OK)

Richard & Wendy Devillier, et al. v. State of Texas

Houston, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a taking of private property without just compensation (inverse condemnation) in violation of the Texas and United States Constitutions.

This case was filed in the 253rd Judicial District Court of Chambers County, 20-DCV-0300, and was removed to the federal court by the State of Texas.

The... More...
   $0 (04-10-2023 - TX)

Richard DeVillier, et al. v. State of Texas

Houston, Texas eminent domain lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on an inverse condemnation theory.

This case was filed in the 253rd Judicial District Court of Chambers County, 20-DCV-0300, and was removed to federal court by the State of Texas.

Property Owners filed suits in Texas state courts claiming that the flooding of their land by the State of Texas constitu... More...
   $0 (03-23-2023 - TX)

Perry Bonin, et al. Sabine River Authority of Texas, et al.

Beaumont, Texas civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Sabine River Authority of Texas, et al. on inverse condemnation theories.





Federal Courthouse - Beaumont, Texas


Federal Courthouse - Beaumont, Texas


More...   $0 (02-13-2023 - )

Navigator SMS Pipeline, LLC v. Randal D. Haley

El Reno, condemnation lawyers represented the parties in an eminent domain case involving the accusation of certain rights, title and interest in real property for use in the construction and operation of a pipeline.




More...
   $65000 (01-04-2023 - OK)

City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma v. James Michael Ritz, a/k/a J. Michael Reitz, trustee, et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyer represented Defendants who were sued on eminent domain law theories seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interest in real property owned by Defendants for street right-0f-way.

The commissioners appoint by the Court awarded Defendants $95,000.

... More...
   $0 (11-28-2022 - OK)

Allen Flores; Shark Ventures, Inc. d/b/a Shark Shack; Bliss, Inc. d/b/a Bliss Lounge; and Barfly Lounge, Inc. d/b/a Playground Patio Bar v. The City of Galveston, Texas and Yaga's Entertainment, Inc. and Brian Maxwell, in his Official Capacity only

Houston, Texas – Civil Litigation lawyer represented Appellants with seeking injunctive and declaratory relief barring the performance of a contract.



The contract that is the subject of this appeal is the Galveston Mardi Gras
Promoter Agreement 2016-18 (the “Contract”) regarding the City’s selection of More...
   $0 (11-23-2022 - TX)

Harris County Fresh Water Supply District No. 61 v. Magellan Pipeline Company, L. P. and V-Tex Logistics LLC

Houston, Texas – Civil Litigation lawyer represented Appellant with rather governmental entity is immune from a suit to condemn a portion of its property for an easement.



A. The Pipeline Project
Magellan Pipeline Company, LP and V-Tex Logistics, LLC are pipeline
companies, and each owns its own pipeline syst... More...
   $0 (11-23-2022 - TX)

City of Owasso v. Key Plus Properties, LLC, et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer represented Defendant sued by Plaintiff on an eminent domain theory seeking to obtain some right, title and interest in real property owned by Defendant for public use and convenience.

Matt Mardis, George O'Connor and Max Tankersley were appointed commissioners to assess the compensation due to Defendant as a result of the taking in the amount of $403,8... More...
   $0 (09-30-2022 - OK)

City of Tulsa v. Jay Jones, et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma real property lawyers represented Defendants sued by the City of Tulsa on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by Defendants for public use on Union Avenue.

GREENOUGH, KELLY M; CASE COMES ON APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONERS; MARK SWINEY APPEARS FOR PLAINTIFF; MICHAEL PACEWIZ APPEARS FOR DEFENDANTS... More...
   $0 (08-09-2022 - OK)

City of Norman, Oklahoma v. Ronald A. Ashley, et al.

Norman, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer represented Defendant, who was sued by Plaintiff to acquire some right, title and interested in owned by him to use for a roadway, drainage and utility purposes in the widening of 36th Avenue, NW in Norman.

Commissioners appointed by the Court reported that they believed that Defendant should be paid $105,000 in damages.



... More...
   $210000 (07-07-2022 - OK)

Exotic Smoke & Vape v. Spencer J. Cox

Salt Lake City, Utah civil litigation lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued the State of Utah on a regulatory taking theory.


In March 2021, Utah enacted Senate Bill 189, the “Tobacco Retailer Amendments.” As relevant here, Senate Bill 189 amended Utah Code §§ 10-8-041.6 and 17-50-33 to prohibit the operation of a “Retail tobacco specialty business” within “1,000 feet of ... More...
   $0 (06-28-2022 - UT)

STATE OF TENNESSEE EX REL. HERBERT H. SLATERY, III, ATTORNEY GENERAL AND REPORTER V. HRC MEDICAL CENTERS, INC. ET AL

Nashville, TN - Civil Litigation lawyer represented appellees with arguing against having real estate sold in order to collect on a judgment.



In this appeal, we construe the statutory right of redemption set forth in Tenn. Code
Ann. § 66-8-101, and specifically whether that right co... More...
   $0 (06-27-2022 - TN)

Steve Snow and Kaci Snow v. Town of Calumet Oklahoma

El Reno, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on trespass and inverse condemnation theories.


¶0 Landowners sued the Town of Calumet for trespass and inverse condemnation due to maintaining two municipal sewer lines across the owners' property after the expiration of two temporary easements. The town counterclaimed to quiet title. Both parties moved... More...
   $0 (06-21-2022 - OK)

United States of America v. Clay Turner

New Orleans, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with possession of an animal in an animal fighting venture.

Clay Turner, 61, of Loranger, Turner possessed and trained dogs for the purpose of having them participate in animal fighting ventures. On telephone calls obtained via court-authorized wiretaps, Turner and others discussed gambling on dog fights, arrangi... More...
   $0 (04-13-2022 - LA)

Charles Chesnut, et al. v. City of Baltimore, et al.

This case arises out of the arrest, prosecution, and conviction of Plaintiffs Alfred
Chestnut (“Chestnut”), Andrew Stewart, Jr. (“Stewart”), and Ransom Watkins (“Watkins”)
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) for felony murder of a 14-year-old boy named DeWitt Duckett in
1983. (ECF No. 1.) On November 25, 2019, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City granted the
Plaintiffs... More...
   $0 (02-27-2022 - MD)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: